OF THE
TIMES
"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not fearful men, not descended from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes which were for the moment unpopular."The great American broadcast journalist, Edward Murrow, spoke these words in the 1950s, protesting against the witch-hunt of communists, alleged communists, or of anyone thought to evince anything resembling sympathy or support for ideas associated with communism, by Senator Joseph McCarthy and his House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC).
"The Secret Correspondence Between Donald Trump Jr. and WikiLeaks"The Atlantic notes that, "The messages, obtained by The Atlantic, were also turned over by Trump Jr.'s lawyers to congressional investigators."
The transparency organization asked the president's son for his cooperation - in sharing its work, in contesting the results of the election, and in arranging for Julian Assange to be Australia's ambassador to the United States.
With tedious regularity over the course of the Russiagate scandal a new 'revelation' appears which on close examination turns out to be no sort of revelation at all.
The purpose behind its appearance is not to report 'news', since the 'revelation' more often than not is not truly 'news' . Rather the purpose is to keep the Russiagate story alive by any means possible, thereby creating the appearance that the Russiagate story has evidence behind it when in reality it has none.
The latest publication of emails that passed between Wikileaks and Donald Trump Junior is a case in point.
I am not going to waste time analysing this foolishness, but I will say the following:
(1) none of the emails touch on the Russiagate collusion allegations in the slightest way or give the slightest grounds for believing them to be true or suggest any degree of collusion between the Trump campaign and Wikileaks let alone between the Trump campaign and the Russians;
(2) the vast majority of the emails were from Wikileaks to Donald Trump Junior. He appears to have replied on just three occasions, doing so moreover rather briefly;
(3) Wikileaks' purpose - understandable enough in a news/campaigning organisation - appears to have been to ensure that its publication of the DNC and Podesta emails got maximum publicity, whilst also keeping the story going by getting Trump to release his tax returns and to contest the election result when (as everyone expected) Hillary Clinton won;
(4) Wikileaks failed on all counts, with Donald Trump Junior and his father - who may or may not have known about the emails - refusing or failing to take the bait on any one of them; and
(5) none of the activity set out in the emails is of a remotely criminal nature and all the emails had already been previously disclosed by Donald Trump Junior to Congressional investigators and presumably to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
One further point I will make about this singularly silly episode.
This is that at least in the previous instances of 'no-news' we have had throughout Russiagate - eg. Michael Flynn's conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak, Jeff Sessions's meeting with Russian ambassador Kislyak, Jared Kushner's meeting with Russian ambassador Kislyak, Donald Trump Junior's meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, and the indictments against Paul Manafort, Rick Gates and George Papadopoulos - it has been necessary to spend time and energy explaining why they are in fact 'no-news'.
The Wikileaks/Donald Trump Junior email correspondence is different. This time the 'no-news' event is so thin that it is actually non-existent. There is therefore no need to waste time on it.
Comment: True, 100 out of a party of 380,000 is nothing - but some of them were elected officials. More significant, perhaps, is the fact that LREM was a ready-made party created for the sole purpose of electing Macron as president, so the loyalty of its members is not related to ideological principles, but to their sympathies to Macron. If he is perceived as "arrogant and undemocratic", he may be losing more party members in the near future.
Further reading on Macron's 'methods':
The world according to Emmanuel Macron: The days of popular sovereignty are over