The main news headline on the BBC Scotland pages on October 24th 2023 was: '
Winter death toll worst in more than 30 years.' This refers to last winter, 2022-23. This is nearly three years after the 'once in a century' pandemic and two years after the population was jabbed to 'end' said pandemic.
There you go, high excess deaths are worthy of comment! So much stranger then, that the BBC and the rest of the mainstream media maintained radio silence following
Andrew Bridgen's speech to an empty House of Commons, just four days earlier on October 20th.
Let's just look at the Scottish numbers (available
here). They cover the winter period, December to March, the period of the year with the highest level of deaths.
In 2018-19 there were 20,188 registered deaths in Scotland between December and March. In 2022-23 the provisional figure is 24,427, an increase of 21%. 2018-19 seems like a pretty good comparator because it's the last year before there was any chance of Covid skewing the data. Whilst there were no recorded Covid deaths in the winter of 2019-20 there has since been plenty of speculation that Covid was around. But, if you prefer, let's compare this winter to 2019-20, well, it's still a whacking 14.2% higher.
The odd thing is that the winter of 2022-23 was remarkably benign from an infectious disease point of view: no big flu outbreaks, no Covid waves, no nothing. Perhaps even more remarkably, with the exception of the high flu deaths year of 2014-15, the year on year increase from 2021-22 to 2022-23 was the largest in over 20 years.Figure 2 shows winter deaths for each year going back to 1951. See if you can spot when the once in a century pandemic struck?Or, see if you can see when, following the coerced vaccination of 90% of the adult population with an 'emergency use authorised' treatment, this terrible pandemic abated?Finally, figure 3 shows the winter deaths from 2012-13 up to last winter. In the winter of 2020-21 we had schools closed, society locked down, people wandering around in masks terrified for their lives, yet fewer people were dying then than died during the benign, no-fuss winter just gone.
Military contractors who work in the information space are erecting firewalls between that truth and the public, using “adulteration,” “contamination” and civil suits against Pfizer to delay/deflect. by KATHERINE WATT OCT 28, 2023 [Link]
.
I got a text this morning re: Robert Malone making the media rounds discussing SV-40 and other “contaminants” sequenced from vials of DoD biochemical weapons labeled as “Covid-19 vaccines;” “adulteration,” and “short DNA fragments not in the formulations” provided to the FDA.The person who sent the text doesn’t regularly read Bailiwick or Sasha Latypova’s Due Diligence Substack.
He paraphrased Malone’s points as: “has potential to cause vaccine removal from sale and Pfizer exposure to fraud allegations” and wondered if the information could cause the judge in Brook Jackson’s whistleblower case to set aside judgment.
My reply:
No. It’s a red herring intended to divert and distract…Sasha and I have been posting explainer pieces in the last week or so.
Oct. 16, 2023 - On the materiality and immateriality of fraud and of government knowledge of fraud for legal challenges to US government Covid policies, programs and product use. [Link] (Katherine Watt)
Oct. 19, 2023 - Breaking: Pfizer is going under the bus... [Link] (Sasha Latypova) - “…As part of “covid live military exercise” it was always planned that when deaths and injuries become so undeniable, that 98%+ Americans refuse the boosters (and technically become anti-vaxxers), and the truth about DOD deploying bioweapons on Americans with intent to kill and harm becomes sort of known, Pfizer will be “prosecuted” with much great publicity (to drown out the truth)…”
Oct. 23, 2023 - OMG, SV40! Can We Sue Pfizer NOW? [Link] (Sasha Latypova)
Oct. 23, 2023 - On civil suits against Pfizer for “contamination” of Covid-19 biochemical weapons. [Link] (Katherine Watt)
Oct. 26, 2023 - 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(3) and 360bbb-3a(c) [Link] : federal law authorizing HHS Secretary to waive current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) for EUA products. (Katherine Watt)
Best use of red herring, in my view, is to use it to point back to kill box laws [Link] , Congress, Department of Defense, and World Health Organization.
That’s what Malone and his colleagues are tasked with hiding…
SV-40 promoter inserts are real.
What Malone, Steve Kirsch and other DoD spokesmen are doing is a distraction maneuver to keep attention away from the intentional toxicity of the biochemical weapons, the DoD/WHO control of the programs, and the fact that “biodefense” is camouflage for straight-up State-sponsored biowarfare, conducted by bringing pharmaceutical companies into the military-industrial-Congressional complex, calling bioweapons “vaccines,” and terrifying people into taking them under “public health emergency” and “pandemic” narratives.
More county and state lawmakers are starting to figure out the federal mass murder program and work on responses to protect the people in their political jurisdictions.
So the Monster is deploying Malone, Kirsch and the rest of the narrative-management team to take the SV-40 story in the wake of Kevin McKernan and others doing more sequencing studies, and direct it away from US kill box laws, DoD, WHO, intentionality and the intrinsic lethality of all mRNA platform technologies , toward civil suits against Pfizer for “adulteration” and “contamination.”
They are trying to shield the mRNA technology and ‘vaccination’ program platforms, and the public health emergency geopolitical and legal platforms from growing public understanding of what’s really going on, so that the Monster can keep using “public health emergency” laws, orchestrated “pandemics,” “vaccines,” and mRNA-platform poisons to sicken and kill many more people for many years to come.