OF THE
TIMES
"Drumpf pivot will be exploited & milked into a resurgence of nationalism."Well yes. Nationalism is a form of control for sure... How can 'Drumpf'(interesting choice of words) forget "Triumph of the Will"? Those duped into fighting for "power, consequence, and grandeur" [Link] under any flag...glory to whatever[insert country name here] or "[G]god"(no matter the name used or unnamed) ever figure out that they are being duped? [Link] When will people ever learn???
VooDoo6Donald Trump's grandfather immigrated to the United States in 1885 at the age of 16. That, of course, makes the candidate's tirades over Mexican immigrants in the US all the more ironic. But his grandfather didn't use the name Drumpf. Although that had been the originally spelling of the family's name, it had already been changed during the reign of Napoleon around the turn of the 19th century, according to the transportation association in Kallstadt. [Link]"Drumpf pivot will be exploited & milked into a resurgence of nationalism."Well yes. Nationalism is a form of control for sure... How can 'Drumpf'(interesting choice of words) forget "Triumph of the Will"? Those duped into fighting for "power, consequence, and grandeur" [Link] under any flag...glory to whatever[insert country name here] or "[G]god"(no matter the name used or unnamed) ever figure out that they are being duped? [Link] When will people ever learn???
It makes sense that as things deteriorate (in the "rich countries"/"developed countries") the people there will take in the poison of nationalism(in its extreme form nazisim) more easily -- especially if it is "funded" in social credit and by extension CBDCs... Will it all come together though or will enough see what is happening and resist?
... and one of his wine-making ancestors changed the family name to Trump at the end of the 1600s. [Link]I find that most doubtful.
VooDoo6You can doubt it all you want.... and one of his wine-making ancestors changed the family name to Trump at the end of the 1600s. [Link]I find that most doubtful.
There is no German word "Trump". But Trumpf / Drumpf would have the same meaning as the English "Trump" (the card game clincher). Only after founding the German empire in 1871 the orthography was standardized. Until then, different spellings of the same term were accepted in different German duchies and kingdoms.
I can see no motivation to change one's surname from a positive connotation to a meaningless one.
No other candidat e for the White House this year has anything close to Trump’s record of repeated social and business dealings with mobsters, swindlers, and other crooks. Professor Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian, said the closest historical example would be President Warren G. Harding and Teapot Dome, a bribery and bid-rigging scandal in which the interior secretary went to prison. But even that has a key difference: Harding’s associates were corrupt but otherwise legitimate businessmen, not mobsters and drug dealers .That snippet I have to question a bit... Obviously almost all politicians are and have dealings with "mobsters, swindlers, and other crooks" and "legitimate businessmen" is an oxymoron (I think - especially those run by globalists).
VooDoo6 Just What Were Donald Trump's Ties to the Mob ? [Link] ... Thanks for the link...This snippet of it caught my "blind" eyes:Yes agreed.No other candidat e for the White House this year has anything close to Trump’s record of repeated social and business dealings with mobsters, swindlers, and other crooks. Professor Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian, said the closest historical example would be President Warren G. Harding and Teapot Dome, a bribery and bid-rigging scandal in which the interior secretary went to prison. But even that has a key difference: Harding’s associates were corrupt but otherwise legitimate businessmen, not mobsters and drug dealers .That snippet I have to question a bit... Obviously almost all politicians are and have dealings with "mobsters, swindlers, and other crooks" and "legitimate businessmen" is an oxymoron (I think - especially those run by globalists).
My thought is that Trump(regardless of family origin name changes) does represent "legitimate businessmen"( ) that have national loyalties over international ones. And that is one step towards decentralization (nation states) that puts a rod in globalism's wheel spokes (I think).
I can very easily see & understand where changing a name from Drumpf to Trump is an easily more positive connotation & sounding - pleasing to the ear name.Discussing that is pointless anyway.
They took it as far as they could because they run both sides of the game theory equation.I think that is key here and a good observation. This posted article (on SOTT) regarding Trump also adds to that:
VooDoo6Ricardo Mazzucchelli = MobsterThey took it as far as they could because they run both sides of the game theory equation.I think that is key here and a good observation. This posted article (on SOTT) regarding Trump also adds to that:
Was he[Trump] duped by ego narcism or was he a "think tank" planner of both sides of the game theory cabalism equation? Or something else? Pure controlled opposition like Tucker Carlson or Anderson Cooper with intel social engineering schooling, seems unlikely[for Trump] I think.
Got lost in the rabbit hole on Riccardo Mazzucchelli...felt kinda like a limited hangout. I know he was briefly married to Ivana and they broke up 20 months later [Link]
Ricardo Mazzucchelli = MobsterCould be. Doesn't seem relevant though to me?? John McCain was connected to the mob too. So are all the intel agencies(think Iran-Contra Affair as one minor example). What is relevant though to me - is/can centralization of power be decentralized minimizing un-necessary suffering? Does a figure like Trump or Putin represent a meaningful attempt at decentralization (of globalization) by supporting the nation state concept (even if they can become totalitarian)?
VooDoo6Amazing to think that the contemporaneous idiom “Birds of feather, flock together” somehow doesn’t resonate. If YOU research it you will find it.Ricardo Mazzucchelli = MobsterCould be. Doesn't seem relevant though to me?? John McCain was connected to the mob too. So are all the intel agencies(think Iran-Contra Affair as one minor example). What is relevant though to me - is/can centralization of power be decentralized minimizing un-necessary suffering? Does a figure like Trump or Putin represent a meaningful attempt at decentralization (of globalization) by supporting the nation state concept (even if they can become totalitarian)?
I am confused. Ricardo Mazzucchelli = Mobster = Trump?If you looked up above what I already posted a link to you would know. Or do your own follow up research. It’s clearly all there, not difficult at all.
Stupefying ignorance on so many levels.