OF THE
TIMES
Even before the current Ukraine crisis kicked off, the British military served more as an object of derision than a template of professionalism. Take, by way of example, the visit of UK Defense Secretary Ben Wallace to Zagreb, Croatia in early February 2022. Croatian President Zoran Milanovic accused the British of trying to incite Ukraine into a war with Russia, as opposed to trying to address Russia's concerns over the existing European security framework. Wallace flew to Zagreb for consultations, only to be rebuked by Milanovic, who refused to meet with him, noting that he only met with the defense ministers of superpowers, adding that "the UK has left the EU, and this gives it less importance."A round table of military analysts had this to say:
But London keeps putting a brave face on a sorry reality. Take, for example, the offer of written security assurances to Sweden and Finland made by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. These pledges were designed to bolster the resolve of the two Nordic nations as they considered their applications to join NATO.
But there was no substance to the British offer, if for no other reason than the British had nothing in the way of viable military capability to offer either the Swedes or the Finns. Even as Johnson proffered the proverbial hand of assistance to his newfound Nordic allies, the UK Ministry of Defense was wrestling with planned force reductions that would see the British Army cut from its current "established strength" of 82,000 to 72,500 by 2025 (the actual strength of the British Army is around 76,500, reflecting ongoing difficulties in recruitment and retention.)
Even these numbers are misleading - the British Army is only capable of generating one fully combat-ready maneuver brigade (3,500 to 4,000 men with all the necessary equipment and support). Given the reality that the UK is already on the hook for a reinforced battalion-sized "battlegroup" that is to be deployed to Estonia as part of NATO's so-called enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) posture (joining three other similarly-sized "battlegroups" fielded by the US in Poland, Germany in Lithuania, and Canada in Latvia), it is questionable whether the British could even accomplish this limited task.
One of Gilbert's favourite comic themes is the elevation of an unqualified person to a position of high responsibility. In The Happy Land (1873), for example, Gilbert describes a world in which government offices are awarded to the person who has the least qualification to hold each position. In particular, the one who has never heard of a ship is appointed to the cabinet post of First Lord of the Admiralty.[n 10][146] In Pinafore, Gilbert revisits this theme in the character of Sir Joseph, who rises to the same position by "never go[ing] to sea".[116][147] In later Gilbert and Sullivan operas, the characters Major-General Stanley in Pirates, and Ko-Ko in The Mikado, are similarly appointed to high office though lacking the necessary qualifications.
As reported by AFP, according to the Admiral, the invasion has resulted in the deaths or injuries of 50,000 Russian soldiers and the destruction of approximately 1,700 Russian tanks and 4,000 armoured battle vehicles.He must have been playing Battlefield or Call of Duty. When has an admiral ever spoken about land war losses? He's an admiral, not a general. Obviously, he's misinformed.
So, that gets me wondering: how does the astrological chart tie in with a clone, or a person born in a laboratory?As stated elsewhere, I am not into astrology. So I can't comment on that.
I once attended a conference about the future of human birthing, and how the plan is for humans to be born in factories... I was skeptical and at the end of the talk, I asked the talker about how the human soul fits into the scenario, kind of to catch him out. Obviously he had considered all angles, and his answer left an impression: the souls that get born into the bodies of clones and artificial humans will be degenerate souls, souls that are now currently developing their karma that would cause them to be born into such bodies, whose essence is so far removed from their human personality, and so a part of their karma is to be born into a physical body which has corrupted DNA, or a cloned body, where the force of materialism is stronger than the influences of the spiritual and soul realms.Have you read Huxley's "Brave New World" ? Just asking....
[Link]