Running Time: 01:24:53
Download: MP3 — 117 MB
SOTT
SIGNS
OF THE
TIMES
OF THE
TIMES
Welcome to Sott.net
The World for People who Think
SOTT Focus:
Running Time: 01:24:53
Download: MP3 — 117 MB
Reader Comments
Protectron77 - so you think “yes” as well?
seems to be 2-0 just now. The best hockey score to come back from you want my opinion, but I better watch this.
seems to be 2-0 just now. The best hockey score to come back from you want my opinion, but I better watch this.
Protectron77 You can tell the lies by the circle talk, and where it came from, just like the snake eating itself symbol.
RJA210163 - I got no answer. I better watch this. I suspect the answer is yes as you suggest.
RJA210163 Longer answer: is this really a question? Yes, hell yes, and furthermore, f**king hell yes.
parzival So too, does their leader, Satan. The seat of Satan, is another rabbit hole I'm circling back on. Besides Hitler, Obama also liked this building and used it's appearance extensively. I just learned it's been closed since 2014 for renovations, was supposed to open in 2019, but it's now delayed to 2023, cost over runs and all, interesting.
JTF Truth Hitler. I do not believe the jew media history. If the “good guys” won, how come the world is so incredibly evil right now and run by Talmudic small hats?
Fool on the Hill Don't hate the Jews, don't hate. Be angry at those pretending to be Jews, that worship Satan and his ways!
Who are the Good Guys? Both sides were Evil. Wars serve those who wish to conquer, who wish to rule us all? Both sides wished/wish to accomplish these. Divide and conquer. We've been led to believe, that the country, founded by masons (who worship the light bringer), whose capital is laid out according to masonic (Babylon/Pharonic) traditions and whose currency tells us the masonic goals, was the good guy who saved us all by joining the war effort. Deceit on a grand scale. As in the days of Noah, all men's thoughts were of evil, continually. How is this possible if people for the most part are good to each other (excluding the psycho's amongst us)? If everything you believe, is in fact a lie. If everything you believe, is a lie, then you believe evil and you don't even know it. Doesn't matter if you are considered a good person or not, you believe in the lie.
The world is so incredibly evil right now (as in the days of Noah), that most if not all that we've been taught is a lie and most of us don't even know it, except for those who have eyes to see. I'm trying to re-find a passage that tells us about this.
Who are the Good Guys? Both sides were Evil. Wars serve those who wish to conquer, who wish to rule us all? Both sides wished/wish to accomplish these. Divide and conquer. We've been led to believe, that the country, founded by masons (who worship the light bringer), whose capital is laid out according to masonic (Babylon/Pharonic) traditions and whose currency tells us the masonic goals, was the good guy who saved us all by joining the war effort. Deceit on a grand scale. As in the days of Noah, all men's thoughts were of evil, continually. How is this possible if people for the most part are good to each other (excluding the psycho's amongst us)? If everything you believe, is in fact a lie. If everything you believe, is a lie, then you believe evil and you don't even know it. Doesn't matter if you are considered a good person or not, you believe in the lie.
The world is so incredibly evil right now (as in the days of Noah), that most if not all that we've been taught is a lie and most of us don't even know it, except for those who have eyes to see. I'm trying to re-find a passage that tells us about this.
JTF Truth - it is tough if not impossible to come back from a hockey score when your team is down 7-0?
JTF Truth - being you are from Canada, you must know, in the NHL what was the greatest comeback ever?
Now, in the NFL, I can answer that question because it was my home team that pulled the feat off.
I'll await your response and funny thing is I'm starting to wonder about chatting on the web and such.
I prefer face-to-face!
Ken
JTF Truth - being you are from Canada, you must know, in the NHL what was the greatest comeback ever?
Now, in the NFL, I can answer that question because it was my home team that pulled the feat off.
I'll await your response and funny thing is I'm starting to wonder about chatting on the web and such.
I prefer face-to-face!
Ken
Buffalo_Ken Comebacks are fun to watch and great to see, especially if it is your team that accomplished the comeback. I'm all for comebacks!
I no longer watch much hockey or sports anymore, simply because it became more about money and less about the game. For hockey, I'm sorry to say, but I think the American's ruined it for me and it all started the moment NHL corporate offices moved from Canada to the USA and FOX Sports used computer animation to highlight the puck. (dumbing down the audience) Since it's been controlled by Americans and led by an American, the rules have changed and been "dumbed down". Like Canada's national anthem, to which I no longer no WTF the words are anymore because of all the self righteous diversity changes, I no longer understand all the stupid changes the American's made to our national sport (no longer since we no longer make the rules ;)). And then the Europeans and their penalty shots(shoot outs). The most stupid efing rule ever dreamed of. So basically why waste my time for any point based game, save me the 90 minutes of play and just go straight to penalty shots to determine the outcomes. We should do this to your Grand NFL. Ef the 4 quarters, just line up both teams at the 50 yard line and whoever gets the first unchallenged field goal from there, decides the game. Baseball, who ever hits the first unchallenged home run wins, B-ball (which was Canadian) same thing, first unchallenged free throw from center court. Only televise the games, since, they'll be decided within 15 mins and the networks can stretch that time out as far as they want.
If I was a player and the tie game was decided by a penalty shot, I'd quit. What's the point wasting all that time effort, training and energy, for the whole thing to be decided by a lucky shot, throw or hit.
So my friend, you want to know what I think is the best comeback in Hockey ever? Well, I'll tell you what I think was the best comeback ever in Hockey. Canada vs USSR tournament, where Canada came back and won the tournament. [Link] As for the best Hockey game I've ever watched (besides going and watching any junior game) was the Washington Capitals and New York Islanders. April 18, 1987: 68:47 Minutes of Overtime New York Islanders 3 Washington Capitals 2. I'll never forget that game, I got home from my 4pm-12am shift at the brewery, flipped the tele on and this game was already in overtime. It was end to end, fast mostly clean Hockey and exciting. I'll never forget it!
Thanks for the link! Always interesting to see what sportscasters think is the best, but isn't always the best.
p.s. Don't ever get your hopes up about the Leaf's. They are owned by a corporation whose shares are traded, meaning they need to provide Shareholder Value, which doesn't equate to winning, it equates to $$$. So even in a losing season, they still make more money than the majority of the other teams. Who is the sucker there? As for the Habs, they are privately owned by the Molsons, so they want to win and make some money along the way, just like all the other privately owned teams.
I no longer watch much hockey or sports anymore, simply because it became more about money and less about the game. For hockey, I'm sorry to say, but I think the American's ruined it for me and it all started the moment NHL corporate offices moved from Canada to the USA and FOX Sports used computer animation to highlight the puck. (dumbing down the audience) Since it's been controlled by Americans and led by an American, the rules have changed and been "dumbed down". Like Canada's national anthem, to which I no longer no WTF the words are anymore because of all the self righteous diversity changes, I no longer understand all the stupid changes the American's made to our national sport (no longer since we no longer make the rules ;)). And then the Europeans and their penalty shots(shoot outs). The most stupid efing rule ever dreamed of. So basically why waste my time for any point based game, save me the 90 minutes of play and just go straight to penalty shots to determine the outcomes. We should do this to your Grand NFL. Ef the 4 quarters, just line up both teams at the 50 yard line and whoever gets the first unchallenged field goal from there, decides the game. Baseball, who ever hits the first unchallenged home run wins, B-ball (which was Canadian) same thing, first unchallenged free throw from center court. Only televise the games, since, they'll be decided within 15 mins and the networks can stretch that time out as far as they want.
If I was a player and the tie game was decided by a penalty shot, I'd quit. What's the point wasting all that time effort, training and energy, for the whole thing to be decided by a lucky shot, throw or hit.
So my friend, you want to know what I think is the best comeback in Hockey ever? Well, I'll tell you what I think was the best comeback ever in Hockey. Canada vs USSR tournament, where Canada came back and won the tournament. [Link] As for the best Hockey game I've ever watched (besides going and watching any junior game) was the Washington Capitals and New York Islanders. April 18, 1987: 68:47 Minutes of Overtime New York Islanders 3 Washington Capitals 2. I'll never forget that game, I got home from my 4pm-12am shift at the brewery, flipped the tele on and this game was already in overtime. It was end to end, fast mostly clean Hockey and exciting. I'll never forget it!
Thanks for the link! Always interesting to see what sportscasters think is the best, but isn't always the best.
p.s. Don't ever get your hopes up about the Leaf's. They are owned by a corporation whose shares are traded, meaning they need to provide Shareholder Value, which doesn't equate to winning, it equates to $$$. So even in a losing season, they still make more money than the majority of the other teams. Who is the sucker there? As for the Habs, they are privately owned by the Molsons, so they want to win and make some money along the way, just like all the other privately owned teams.
JTF Truth - ooh. give me some time to come back and read the rest of that.
JTF - I have some things I'm speculating on and sometimes I think it is best just to keep it inside....still, I think the zman is who I think "he" is, but what difference does it make I suppose - just trying to connect dots and get a bit more familiar with my internet friends.
Ken
JTF - I have some things I'm speculating on and sometimes I think it is best just to keep it inside....still, I think the zman is who I think "he" is, but what difference does it make I suppose - just trying to connect dots and get a bit more familiar with my internet friends.
Ken
JTF Truth I don’t hate anyone in particular, but if their religion teaches them to abuse humans, I detest that. Jews that reject Jesus and follow the Talmud are the “fake Jews”. It’s not just the fake jews, there are plenty of other societies that worship evil and have much say in the affairs of this world. The billions of dollars given immediately to the homeland of the khazars, outright Nazi’s, should be absolute proof of who runs America.
Fool on the Hill - Lets all just remember - the Zionist is not a Jew nor is a Jew a Zionist.
With that said, there is some statistical evidence that suggest those of the Zionist view tend to call themselves a Jew.
So what is to be done?
How does one identify a zionist would be a fair question for a sniper to ask. I hate to say this, but I'll say it nonetheless. I know the answer. good thing I'm not a sniper...
With that said, there is some statistical evidence that suggest those of the Zionist view tend to call themselves a Jew.
So what is to be done?
How does one identify a zionist would be a fair question for a sniper to ask. I hate to say this, but I'll say it nonetheless. I know the answer. good thing I'm not a sniper...
JTF Truth -
the Europeans and their penalty shots(shoot outs). The most stupid efing rule ever dreamed of.I disagree with this. In all fair games between equal participants there comes a time when the game has to end and penalty shots as random as they are are a way to accomplish this swiftly and skill still matters and it is exciting for the fans. Don't go all "Canadian" on me and I agree - America should have some humility when it comes to hockey and Canada makes for the best players. Practice your penalty shot technique would be my advice. Lastly, "eff" has 2 F's.
JTF Truth - Plus, and lastly, you don't have to worry about me getting my hopes up regarding the Toronto team. I cheer for the Sabres.
The Buffalo team mind ya. Now do you want to know who I think you are? Oh yeah, and lastly again - eff has two f's.
The Buffalo team mind ya. Now do you want to know who I think you are? Oh yeah, and lastly again - eff has two f's.
JTF Truth - best I can tell this was the best comeback of all time, but that game you mentioned - I remember watching a game betwixt the Sabres and the Stars out of Dallas - oh boy. Hockey. From the link as I'm listening to the speakers here at sott.net whom I really appreciate a lot - I will contribute again.
2008 Montreal Canadiens vs New York Rangers The Montreal Canadiens are one of the oldest franchises in North American sports. And as you can see, their history is as deep and as strong as it gets.There isn't much to do up there, eh? I don't mean particularly in Montreal, but Canada as a whole is pretty barren, and the weather makes it difficult to do many activities outdoors for more than half the year.This is where superfans come from and what constitutes a truly strong fan base. I have never played the game, but I have laced up the skates once, and there is a chunk of either spine or fat deposit that still floats around my lower back to this day.That fall hurt, but not as bad as the one time I fought a former hockey player in the street. He had my shirt, and the next thing you know, I have 3 plates and 15 screws in my face.I have nothing but respect for these guys. I wish I didn't have to break so many bones to reach that conclusion, but that's life.Montreal came back from being down 5-0 in the first 25 minutes of the game to tie it up for overtime. Then, nobody scores in OT, and we head to penalty shots. That is where the Canadiens did just enough to get a win that will never be forgotten.6-5 Montreal.
2008 Montreal Canadiens vs New York Rangers The Montreal Canadiens are one of the oldest franchises in North American sports. And as you can see, their history is as deep and as strong as it gets.There isn't much to do up there, eh? I don't mean particularly in Montreal, but Canada as a whole is pretty barren, and the weather makes it difficult to do many activities outdoors for more than half the year.This is where superfans come from and what constitutes a truly strong fan base. I have never played the game, but I have laced up the skates once, and there is a chunk of either spine or fat deposit that still floats around my lower back to this day.That fall hurt, but not as bad as the one time I fought a former hockey player in the street. He had my shirt, and the next thing you know, I have 3 plates and 15 screws in my face.I have nothing but respect for these guys. I wish I didn't have to break so many bones to reach that conclusion, but that's life.Montreal came back from being down 5-0 in the first 25 minutes of the game to tie it up for overtime. Then, nobody scores in OT, and we head to penalty shots. That is where the Canadiens did just enough to get a win that will never be forgotten.6-5 Montreal.
JTF Truth
Buffalo_Ken Yes!
Fool on the Hill I'm letting loose with the biblical quotes as I can no longer stand all the evil BS that is thrown at us constantly. It's hard to do anything, without bumping into it. I appreciate your point of view. To give me better understanding of todays world, I have found it helpful to better understand the days of Noah, not just from the Bible. It's calmed me down.
JTF Truth - so the Canadians were behind 5-0. Wonder what it was l like in the locker room?
God Bless the Canadians and you can't deny they won the game in a shoot-off.....
Canadians 6 versus Rangers 5 with the final goal being achieved in the penalty shot shoot-off.
JTF - ha, ha, ah. Oh Canada - free loving really has not been in your interest and Justin is the opposite of justice.
Just like back then in the Roman times when Justinian and his momma contaminated the message of Jesus.
You know?
Well, if not, then at least the Canadians won that hockey game. I'm ready to fight and I hope you are as well. What choice is there?
God Bless the Canadians and you can't deny they won the game in a shoot-off.....
Canadians 6 versus Rangers 5 with the final goal being achieved in the penalty shot shoot-off.
JTF - ha, ha, ah. Oh Canada - free loving really has not been in your interest and Justin is the opposite of justice.
Just like back then in the Roman times when Justinian and his momma contaminated the message of Jesus.
You know?
Well, if not, then at least the Canadians won that hockey game. I'm ready to fight and I hope you are as well. What choice is there?
Fool on the Hill I'm letting loose with the biblical quotes as I can no longer stand all the evil BS that is thrown at us constantly. It's hard to do anything, without bumping into it. I appreciate your point of view. To give me better understanding of todays world, I have found it helpful to better understand the days of Noah, not just from the Bible. It's calmed me down.Well being calm has virtue but one cannot be calm when the waves are rolling. It matters not who I think you are, what matters is if you and I share views about the future we desire.
Buffalo_Ken I had a whole response typed out and it's gone! Poof! wrong button. So short form rewrite:
- Shoot outs (in sports), you'll never convince me otherwise. It lessens the game.
- Penalty shots are not shoot outs and do add flair to any game.
- Hab's are our favorite team. Hab's of the 70's are legendary! How can you not like a team where the guy on the point (defenseman at the defenders blue line) is called Guy Lapointe! Legendary!
- I looked it up and it makes no sense. ef = f and eff = fcuk, but when I say it I say ef or f not eff and if the second f is silent what's La Pointe? I say ef as in f off not eff off. Besides if Live can be Live (Are you playing live? vs Where do you live?) then my ef can be eff. That way if you see me saying eff here, it ain't me.
- Shoot outs (in sports), you'll never convince me otherwise. It lessens the game.
- Penalty shots are not shoot outs and do add flair to any game.
- Hab's are our favorite team. Hab's of the 70's are legendary! How can you not like a team where the guy on the point (defenseman at the defenders blue line) is called Guy Lapointe! Legendary!
- I looked it up and it makes no sense. ef = f and eff = fcuk, but when I say it I say ef or f not eff and if the second f is silent what's La Pointe? I say ef as in f off not eff off. Besides if Live can be Live (Are you playing live? vs Where do you live?) then my ef can be eff. That way if you see me saying eff here, it ain't me.
JTF Truth - that is too funny....you know what - language is up to the masses!
We will choose collectively I reckon - I still am an advocate for 2 f's for fuck it not - whatever you effing want!
Canadians ought take back their country is what I think. As for my country "tis of thee" it has turned into a travesty that makes me cry for the sake of Dolley Madison. Oh my goodness - she was something else. I miss her.
We will choose collectively I reckon - I still am an advocate for 2 f's for fuck it not - whatever you effing want!
Canadians ought take back their country is what I think. As for my country "tis of thee" it has turned into a travesty that makes me cry for the sake of Dolley Madison. Oh my goodness - she was something else. I miss her.
Buffalo_Ken Another thought, what's the difference between "writing" and "spelling" if you can't write anything without spelling it first?
JTF Truth - well somebody can spell something in their mind, but if they can't write it then the spelling makes no matter.
Does that answer your question and do you have another?
Does that answer your question and do you have another?
Buffalo_Ken LOL, good point. If I'm visualizing how to spell it, I think I'm still writing in my mind though?
Excellent discussion. There are many questions that can be asked. Which is more important - nature vs nurture? Does capitalism automatically lead to financial slavery? Can different ethnic races treat each other with respect and honor human rights?
In the many ponerology discussions on MindMatters and the book, what struck me the most was how psychopaths took over ideologies that people believe in, and used the ideology to manipulate those who believed in it. Clif High's term for it was "name stealing" where Khazarians would kill and take the identity of anyone they chose. I saw this in my investigation of neuro linguistic programming, that words and phrases were essentially used as trigger phrases to induce a hypnotic state.
In my view, critical race theory follows that modus operandi. Just as Elan I think stated, the green agenda, the elimination of CO2 and carbon tax is being run by the same people who own oil and cars. The war in the Ukraine is being run by Democrats who are the "party of peace". In the abortion debate, the Democrats have said women own their own bodies, but in the plandemic narrative, no one owns their own body. Where is the ideology in all of this? The ideology is just a tool to manipulate people.
I first ran across "white privilege" in a class my wife was taking in clinical psychology which I was reading because I was interested. If you go to google scholar and enter "white privilege and racism" you will find many articles about "whiteness", "white supremacy" and "white privilege". This is our current educational system. As noted by Luc, there is a kernel of truth in many of these arguments. Just as there is a kernel of truth that humans have deforested many habitats on the earth. They never make the connection that psychopaths have been the power brokers of deforestation and of racist beliefs. It is not the USA, nor the Constitution, nor the founding fathers who created slavery. It was in the psychopath ideology that they are superior and all else are beneath them, all else are animals. This is well stated by Harari the spokesman of the "hackable animals" who have no "will" and no "soul".
In the many ponerology discussions on MindMatters and the book, what struck me the most was how psychopaths took over ideologies that people believe in, and used the ideology to manipulate those who believed in it. Clif High's term for it was "name stealing" where Khazarians would kill and take the identity of anyone they chose. I saw this in my investigation of neuro linguistic programming, that words and phrases were essentially used as trigger phrases to induce a hypnotic state.
In my view, critical race theory follows that modus operandi. Just as Elan I think stated, the green agenda, the elimination of CO2 and carbon tax is being run by the same people who own oil and cars. The war in the Ukraine is being run by Democrats who are the "party of peace". In the abortion debate, the Democrats have said women own their own bodies, but in the plandemic narrative, no one owns their own body. Where is the ideology in all of this? The ideology is just a tool to manipulate people.
I first ran across "white privilege" in a class my wife was taking in clinical psychology which I was reading because I was interested. If you go to google scholar and enter "white privilege and racism" you will find many articles about "whiteness", "white supremacy" and "white privilege". This is our current educational system. As noted by Luc, there is a kernel of truth in many of these arguments. Just as there is a kernel of truth that humans have deforested many habitats on the earth. They never make the connection that psychopaths have been the power brokers of deforestation and of racist beliefs. It is not the USA, nor the Constitution, nor the founding fathers who created slavery. It was in the psychopath ideology that they are superior and all else are beneath them, all else are animals. This is well stated by Harari the spokesman of the "hackable animals" who have no "will" and no "soul".
Dwoods44 - the concept of "exceptionalism" is one I find offensive. It needs to be beat down.
Because if the concept takes root then where does it end?
Between a rock and a hard place?
An immovable object versus an object that never stops moving?
Seriously - at some point the energy gets so intense that something gives. And if this is happening in the background, then it spells uncertainty and that is uncertainty self-fulfilling and eff that. EFF that with two F's. I'm so sick of self-fulfilling elitist that I want to personally kill them one at a time in my mind. Let me get going on that - not effing around....2 ff
Because if the concept takes root then where does it end?
Between a rock and a hard place?
An immovable object versus an object that never stops moving?
Seriously - at some point the energy gets so intense that something gives. And if this is happening in the background, then it spells uncertainty and that is uncertainty self-fulfilling and eff that. EFF that with two F's. I'm so sick of self-fulfilling elitist that I want to personally kill them one at a time in my mind. Let me get going on that - not effing around....2 ff
Dwoods44 Good Comment! and I'll take your word for it, regarding the articles. I have just one question for you, (first thing that popped into my head reading the last paragraph), were any of those articles White Paper articles or written on White Paper?
Sorry, it's the inanity of it all. Man's world, man's doctrines and right in your face, it's on or called a White Paper. Will they ever figure it out that Race has nothing to do with anything, it's just a sidebar to distract everyone from truth's.
Sorry, it's the inanity of it all. Man's world, man's doctrines and right in your face, it's on or called a White Paper. Will they ever figure it out that Race has nothing to do with anything, it's just a sidebar to distract everyone from truth's.
JTF Truth - white is the color you get from light intermixed. Black is more complicated in a way, but is just the absence of white. What is the issue you have?
Of course there has been past racism and other harms - classism is a big harm - but what matters is the future and seriously, the white man is not the cause of all the troubles happening presently. Nor is the black man for that matter. Nor the China man or the man from India. How about we start focusing on things that really matter like growing food for our family.
Of course there has been past racism and other harms - classism is a big harm - but what matters is the future and seriously, the white man is not the cause of all the troubles happening presently. Nor is the black man for that matter. Nor the China man or the man from India. How about we start focusing on things that really matter like growing food for our family.
Buffalo_Ken I have no issue with race. Race is a man concept meant to divide us all. The races I like best, are the ones where the cars go around a race track, horses too, and....swimming, but for the most part, car races.
JTF Truth - I like the race to the end whatever the end may be.
Others call that time. It is full of uncertainty but it can be navigated depending on who you have on your team.
Others call that time. It is full of uncertainty but it can be navigated depending on who you have on your team.
JTF Truth - wants to know.
Does your birth name begin with an M?
If not, then I'm wrong for sure on that, but somebody whose name begins with an M reminds me of you.....must be my right brain imaging connections - imagination is awesome, but not always correct. You know?
Peace, Ken
Buffalo_Ken Who am I?Well, let's start with what I know with confidence - Your name is "JTF Truth" and I've always interpreted the "JTF" part of that to be "just the effing" and then truth is next.
Does your birth name begin with an M?
If not, then I'm wrong for sure on that, but somebody whose name begins with an M reminds me of you.....must be my right brain imaging connections - imagination is awesome, but not always correct. You know?
Peace, Ken
Buffalo_Ken Good guess on the JTF part, it can be that when I'm fed up or it could be Full Truth, Frank Truth, Found Truth or Friggin Truth, when I'm trying to get the Truth out there.
M or eM? LOL, nope.
Now I'll relate to you my story about a BK, cause every time I see you sign off with BK, I can't help think of him. He's not a Buffalo, he's a cat and that's his name, BK. I love him lots.
JTFT
M or eM? LOL, nope.
Now I'll relate to you my story about a BK, cause every time I see you sign off with BK, I can't help think of him. He's not a Buffalo, he's a cat and that's his name, BK. I love him lots.
JTFT
JTF Truth - well, out of all of those I like "Friggin" the best, so that is it I reckon. Just the Friggin Truth!
You know, when we can communicate, that is the time, the moment when the pendulum starts swinging back.
Just the Friggin Truth please, the truth, and nothing but the truth!
Ken
You know, when we can communicate, that is the time, the moment when the pendulum starts swinging back.
Just the Friggin Truth please, the truth, and nothing but the truth!
Ken
32-38 m
--
the fractious belief that ones deformed ideas should be the basis for shaping societal arrangement , variation denying variation, no discussion, “Man is made alien to man".
...and perfect for a system that would seek to bury it's past, and distract and destroy any chance of a future without their unnatural influence.
- can call it what you like, it more of the same, next level state ownership.
--
the fractious belief that ones deformed ideas should be the basis for shaping societal arrangement , variation denying variation, no discussion, “Man is made alien to man".
...and perfect for a system that would seek to bury it's past, and distract and destroy any chance of a future without their unnatural influence.
- can call it what you like, it more of the same, next level state ownership.
Shangri - I suppose to be proper I should watch this show, but I'm so effing angry just now. Good thing there are adults around with whom I can share rage because I don't want to share this with future generations.
OK, 34:15 in or thereabouts by a few seconds and the speaker says in context: Fruedism is a box you cannot escape - that sounds like a challenge to me. Fuck Frued. Eff em. Eff em good. Collectivist who think they have collectively suffered in the past may be correct, but it was their ancestors who suffered and not them, so are the collectivist looking for back payment on the suffering of their ancestors?
EFF that.
My ancestors suffered as well, and so really, don't be a puppet to insidious and nefarious forces trying to bend your will out of hate for the suffering that occurred in the past. What matters is the future.
EFF that.
My ancestors suffered as well, and so really, don't be a puppet to insidious and nefarious forces trying to bend your will out of hate for the suffering that occurred in the past. What matters is the future.
Buffalo_Ken - make that 35:15 in or hells-bells maybe it was 33:15 in.......Freud can shove it up his ass.
34:11 in to be precise.
34:11 in to be precise.
OK, eff it. 38:45 in and yes. The answer is yes. 8-0.
No coming back I'm guessing.
At some point, the time comes for action. Talk is cheap. History inevitable moves forward is true, but utopia is subjective and racism has nothing to do with it - it depends upon decisions that we each make - whether you are white or black or red or poor or asian or african or something else. Talk is cheap. It is an individual decision made one at a time - free will. Choices made freely. Imagine that.
I agree - there is a "fundamental mismatch" happening just now. Time for something better.
No coming back I'm guessing.
At some point, the time comes for action. Talk is cheap. History inevitable moves forward is true, but utopia is subjective and racism has nothing to do with it - it depends upon decisions that we each make - whether you are white or black or red or poor or asian or african or something else. Talk is cheap. It is an individual decision made one at a time - free will. Choices made freely. Imagine that.
I agree - there is a "fundamental mismatch" happening just now. Time for something better.
I don't appreciate the spoiler at 55:55 but I recognize the possibility of a good idea gone bad......I mean at the UU church we had the best ideas to teach our children but lately it seems they have learned nothing. What a shame it all is.
Creating the ability to program anybody is harmful because it is against free will of the individual.
Free will is what matters the most and once you have had it and you know it or at least you think you do, you will fight to the death to keep it, so any efforts to diminish the concept of free will amongst children are efforts to be defended against.
Moreover, and most importantly, "race" is NOT the centralizing concept of how folks interact. What matters to put it simply is merit. Merit does not mean your daddy runs the show, but rather it means you know how to learn and want to share that with others.
Critical Race Theory is an idea pushed by entities that have not learned about history from the 20th century and they want to hold onto old ideas, but the good news is that they will be dead soon because you cannot keep an old man nor an old women from their grave - it will greet them and they will then learn what it means to pass on. That is a one time lesson, but merit is what matters. I could give a shit if you are black or yellow or red or brown - I care about your merit and I hope you have it.
Creating the ability to program anybody is harmful because it is against free will of the individual.
Free will is what matters the most and once you have had it and you know it or at least you think you do, you will fight to the death to keep it, so any efforts to diminish the concept of free will amongst children are efforts to be defended against.
Moreover, and most importantly, "race" is NOT the centralizing concept of how folks interact. What matters to put it simply is merit. Merit does not mean your daddy runs the show, but rather it means you know how to learn and want to share that with others.
Critical Race Theory is an idea pushed by entities that have not learned about history from the 20th century and they want to hold onto old ideas, but the good news is that they will be dead soon because you cannot keep an old man nor an old women from their grave - it will greet them and they will then learn what it means to pass on. That is a one time lesson, but merit is what matters. I could give a shit if you are black or yellow or red or brown - I care about your merit and I hope you have it.
Is this a rhetorical question? Of course it is; starting with the Frankists from the Frankfurt school when they realized the worker bees wouldn’t go for the revolution they needed another vector. Hence Critical Theory—Postmodernism—Deconstructionism— Critical Race Theory ALL falling like raindrops from under “umbrella” framework of MARXISM.
FDRs agriculture Secretary Henry Wallace dispensed with the myth of Marx in his book Whose Constitution? "Both the Communist and Fascist approaches from a spiritual point of view seem to me to have many of the same difficulties as Capitalism. All three are largely the product of the British economics of the early ninetenth century and the post-Darwinian biology with their emphasis on an abstract 'economic man' and an animalistic biological man, dominated by purely mechanical responses." Wallace ends Whose Constitution? by saying that the general welfare can be served: "This will undoubtedly be possible if a spirit of common sense prevails;—and if we use our Constitution as Hamilton anticipated it should be used...." If you don't believe me, just read what Marx himself said.
From an 1847 speech prepared for a conference on “Free Trade” in Brussels (reported by Friedrich Engels).
"These laws, which A. Smith, Say, and Ricardo have developed, the laws under which wealth is produced and distributed—these laws grow more true,more exact, then cease to be mere abstractions, in the same measure in which Free Trade is carried out. . . . If you wish to read in the book of the future, open Smith, Say, Ricardo. There you will find described, as clearly as possible, the condition which awaits the working man under the reign of perfect Free Trade.... Either you must disavow the whole of political economy as it exists at present, or you must allow that under the freedom of trade the whole severity of the laws of political economy will be applied to the working classes. Is that to say that we are against Free Trade? No, we are for Free Trade, because by Free
Trade all economical laws, with their most astounding contradictions, will act upon a larger scale, upon a greater extent of territory, upon the territory of the whole earth; and because from the uniting of all these
contradictions into a single group, where they stand face to face, will result the struggle which will itself eventuate in the emancipation of the proletarians."
And when we ask what Adam Smith's view of humanity is, what do we see? "To man is allotted a much humbler department .... Nature has directed us to the greater part of these by original and immediate instincts. Hunger, thirst,the passion which unites the two sexes, the love of pleasure,and the dread of pain, prompt us to apply those means for their own sakes, and without any consideration of their tendency to those beneficent ends which the great Director of nature intended to produce by them. —Adam Smith Theory of Moral Sentiments 1759
From an 1847 speech prepared for a conference on “Free Trade” in Brussels (reported by Friedrich Engels).
"These laws, which A. Smith, Say, and Ricardo have developed, the laws under which wealth is produced and distributed—these laws grow more true,more exact, then cease to be mere abstractions, in the same measure in which Free Trade is carried out. . . . If you wish to read in the book of the future, open Smith, Say, Ricardo. There you will find described, as clearly as possible, the condition which awaits the working man under the reign of perfect Free Trade.... Either you must disavow the whole of political economy as it exists at present, or you must allow that under the freedom of trade the whole severity of the laws of political economy will be applied to the working classes. Is that to say that we are against Free Trade? No, we are for Free Trade, because by Free
Trade all economical laws, with their most astounding contradictions, will act upon a larger scale, upon a greater extent of territory, upon the territory of the whole earth; and because from the uniting of all these
contradictions into a single group, where they stand face to face, will result the struggle which will itself eventuate in the emancipation of the proletarians."
And when we ask what Adam Smith's view of humanity is, what do we see? "To man is allotted a much humbler department .... Nature has directed us to the greater part of these by original and immediate instincts. Hunger, thirst,the passion which unites the two sexes, the love of pleasure,and the dread of pain, prompt us to apply those means for their own sakes, and without any consideration of their tendency to those beneficent ends which the great Director of nature intended to produce by them. —Adam Smith Theory of Moral Sentiments 1759
Haha so basically IF Im Asian and call a Black person a nigger Im not racist because IF I was I wouldn't get al uppity IF a Black person calls me a Paki?
What IF a Black person calls a Black person a nigger?
How does Marxism fare IF Im a Heinz 57 varieties (my racial pedigree is in question even by myself!) and call a White person a Supremacist, a Black person a nigger, a Jew a child of Satan and Chinese a gook...can I still be on the recieving end of a racial slur?
Im confused.
If I asked minstrel he would laugh.
What IF a Black person calls a Black person a nigger?
How does Marxism fare IF Im a Heinz 57 varieties (my racial pedigree is in question even by myself!) and call a White person a Supremacist, a Black person a nigger, a Jew a child of Satan and Chinese a gook...can I still be on the recieving end of a racial slur?
Im confused.
If I asked minstrel he would laugh.
In addition to a law theory, it is also a political movement. And it all boils down to this:
Someone: So, Black Kid, what are your plans after graduating high school?
Black Kid: well, I have already appl...
CRT fanatic: hold on! You can't talk to Victims that way, bigot! No matter how hard Victims work, they can never achieve anything unless white heterosexual males step aside and let them have a shot.
CRT fanatic: and even if the Victims did do well financially and socially, that only means they have been indoctrinated into White Supremacy. Because the system itself is racist. Then they are no longer true Victims.
Black Kid: ...
Someone: That's the most racist thing I have ever heard.