The last two weeks have brought three new studies finding
negative efficacy for two vaccine doses,
meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated. These are study findings, not raw data, so have been adjusted for various biases and confounders, making it harder to dismiss them as anomalous or skewed.
The first is a
pre-print study from Denmark, published on December 23rd, which looked at nearly all PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 infections in Denmark from November 20th to December 12th and investigated them to see if they were likely to be the Omicron variant.
By comparing the vaccination status of those infected, the researchers found a vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron variant of
minus-76.5% for Pfizer and minus-39.3% for Moderna three months after double vaccination (see chart above), meaning
the double-vaccinated were considerably more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated.
They found the vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was significantly lower than against Delta, with Pfizer vaccine effectiveness at 53.8% and Moderna at 65% against Delta after three months. They reported that a third dose of Pfizer got vaccine effectiveness against Omicron back up to 54.6%, at least for a month. The full results are in the table below:
© Hansen et al
The
latest vaccine effectiveness study from the UKHSA confirms these results. Against Omicron,
the UKHSA reports zero or negative vaccine effectiveness from a double-dose of all three vaccines (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna) after five months. The third dose takes it up again, but only into the 40-60% range, and dropping fast.
© AstraZeneca
© Pfizer
© Moderna
A new
study in
Eurosurveillance from Norway also backs up the observation of negative vaccine effectiveness against Omicron, with
a higher proportion of those who tested positive in the particular outbreak in the study being double-vaccinated than those who did not test positive (98% versus 93%).
Some studies had already found negative vaccine effectiveness against Delta, in line with the
unadjusted figures from the UKHSA, though many people had dismissed these results as anomalous or biased. With Omicron, the reports of negative efficacy are becoming impossible to ignore, with even the UKHSA publishing graphs showing it after three months on two doses. At some point,
health authorities are going to need to grapple with what the data is showing on this and stop pretending it isn't there.
Reader Comments
And still brainwashed idiots on social media with argue that ALL medical experts support the "science" whilst tutting at yet another spectator having a heart attack
Itโs insane. Literally insane.
What can you say? Nothing goes through.
Youโd have more success pissing into the wind and staying dry.
Second it seems that some are asking for the non injected with MRNA Gene Therapy to come back to work after being fired for not complying with the domestic terrorists.
[Link]
liability free"vaccine"If they start buying up on-line dictionaries we will be in real trouble
In event of war cache them underground. Do not let them destroy our vast libraries nor our own personal libraries.
Salut dear friend.
Christmas gift: Simon Say's Game (happy go lucky games inc)
Open box
Lift out game rules pamphlet.
Read rules:
Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, "The Science", NHS, gubbermint goonz, bullets, tazers, mental health Act, Media/Medusa are "SIMON"
Player 1 must roll both dice to achieve movement accross board. Land on SimonSays....your out, game over, your the loser.
Check game components:
Syringe, alcohol swab....sachet of scented "facism".
Rubber gloves, "fear monger" face guard, undertaker coupon, glow-in-dark potion in glass vial, death certificate....
The same sentiment to you.
Scepticism is good, but not enough.
If you don't here is what some of the very few autopsies have found: [Link] and the report : [Link]
And there is my point - if you don't get that this shots were solely designed to kill you, you are lost. Literally ...
Then, they tell me I need a booster because the original jab isn't as "Safe and effective".
They say I'm a danger to society if I don't take the jab.
They also say that if I take the jab, I can still contract and spread the virus.
They say even if I'm jabbed I still need to wear a mask.
They said if i did as I was told it would be a "passport" to freedom.
Seems like the last line is the most honest, only folks who complied are still trying to reach that freedom( carrot )
I'm not sure if your were aware of the difference, I actually only looked up the definition of Efficacy for the first time today as in comments I've always used effective and effectiveness
Efficacy is the ability to produce a desired or intended result ... we know the intended result is not to provide immunity (which means the ability to be infected, which in turns means no ability to transmit)
Without really knowing what the intended result is, it is best that we judge them by their actions, such as the insane lust to jab kids
"As three more studies show NEGATIVE vaccine effectiveness, when will health authorities face up to what the data is telling us?"
And the obvious answer is:
As soon as the taxpayer-sourced money spigot dries up, and the elites can say to us: "Sorry, looks like the funds for Social Security and all other social safety nets are all gone."
(But there will always be money for the MIC, Wall Street bailouts, and Israel, so no worries there.....)
Seems to me like everyone who got vaxed is on a slow road to getting AIDS.
RC
Now I know.
Most normal people cannot fathom the evil this entities are capable of. Denial even in the face of it ...
Curse_of_Canaan That says to me that theyโre half expecting to find cases of HIV. Evil.
codis The sad thing is even after these people die, even their families may still refuse to see the wood for the trees. My brother and his wife still refuse to blame the vaccine. Theyโve done some quite magnificent mental gymnastics as they now believe that his 3 massive brain bleeds was caused by simple old age. The fact he had recently had his second jab is just a strange coincidence. Iโve learned to leave it so I can maintain some sort of relationship with them.
It turns out that my brother has refused the jabs. I thought he was lying to me because he said as much to me for ages and I thought he just didnโt want to admit it (my dad did the same) but it turns out that he actually hasnโt. Not for any of the myriad of reasons I gave him, but because he is a heavy drinker and is on the larger side, not exactly fat but robust if you understand what i mean? Being fat and a heavy drinker was probably the only two reasons I hadnโt warn him about. Either way Iโm glad he remains PureBlooded.
And here is one of many articles I found about testing positive for HIV [Link]
Not much to add here. As I mentioned yesterday, there were diehard Nazis still believing in the Endsieg when Russian troups poured into the Berlin streets. Ze Germans were not at all special in that regard, as it turns out. Having some addiction issues or being not the smartest has no relation to the amount of common sense, it seems. I'm glad for you ... If you got the time, check out Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman to the topic of germ theory, viruses, and the PCR test. Highly recommended.
Since the "virus isolation" procedure includes splitting it up into tiny fragments and "recreating" it's genome through "creative" software algorithms, you will find any virus in any such bacterial culture.
Virology is as fraudulent as black holes and dark matter.
That last sentence caught my attention, re fraudulent black hole bit. Iโm intrigued with that? Itโs a new one for me, and I always like new things to look into
Most of his videos are reposted about a dozen times ...
He explains the incredible weak basis of contemporary virology and the fraudulent and self-deluding "virus isolation" procedure in several videos. Black holes and dark matter are basically the end point of a theory represented by a certain jewish poster boy, who started as out as failure and became the figurehead of relativity - mostly by plagiarism and fraud.
Both "effects" solely rest on singularities in certain physical equations, i.e. were the denominator becomes zero. Problem is, the map is not the landscape, and an empirical equation is not the very representation of nature.
My math lecturer emphatically warned us several times against guys that claim to have those divisions by zero solved...
Oh yeah that guy. Thanks for elaborating I understand now.
It's insane.
RC
The elites seem to believe in Malthusian philosophy which dictates that population numbers must be controlled in order to prevent our demise. The elites have crowned themselves the executors of this plan to "Save Humanity". Isn't it nice that they appointed themselves the arbiters of planet earth? What if its you and yours who've they decided must go?
Happy New Year!
RC
Being coerced is the toughest moral situation one can be in. I can't even fault someone who takes the jab to keep their job. Will their bravery make you feed and house them?
RC
In reluctant defence of the "vaccine", from a statistical pov only, how likely are Purebloods going to test themselves anyway? I simply wouldn't dream of taking a test whereas we hear of all these "vaccinated"/boosted people getting several tests per day
On a similar subject, what it the point of a thermometer (if one does not have kids)
[Link]
In agreement as well.
ABC News accidentally broadcasted a satanic ritual. Now it's going viral on conspiracy theory TikTok : [Link]
Signs of the Times