The first is a pre-print study from Denmark, published on December 23rd, which looked at nearly all PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 infections in Denmark from November 20th to December 12th and investigated them to see if they were likely to be the Omicron variant.
By comparing the vaccination status of those infected, the researchers found a vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron variant of minus-76.5% for Pfizer and minus-39.3% for Moderna three months after double vaccination (see chart above), meaning the double-vaccinated were considerably more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated.
They found the vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was significantly lower than against Delta, with Pfizer vaccine effectiveness at 53.8% and Moderna at 65% against Delta after three months. They reported that a third dose of Pfizer got vaccine effectiveness against Omicron back up to 54.6%, at least for a month. The full results are in the table below:
The latest vaccine effectiveness study from the UKHSA confirms these results. Against Omicron, the UKHSA reports zero or negative vaccine effectiveness from a double-dose of all three vaccines (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna) after five months. The third dose takes it up again, but only into the 40-60% range, and dropping fast.
A new study in Eurosurveillance from Norway also backs up the observation of negative vaccine effectiveness against Omicron, with a higher proportion of those who tested positive in the particular outbreak in the study being double-vaccinated than those who did not test positive (98% versus 93%).
Some studies had already found negative vaccine effectiveness against Delta, in line with the unadjusted figures from the UKHSA, though many people had dismissed these results as anomalous or biased. With Omicron, the reports of negative efficacy are becoming impossible to ignore, with even the UKHSA publishing graphs showing it after three months on two doses. At some point, health authorities are going to need to grapple with what the data is showing on this and stop pretending it isn't there.
Reader Comments
And still brainwashed idiots on social media with argue that ALL medical experts support the "science" whilst tutting at yet another spectator having a heart attack
It’s insane. Literally insane.
What can you say? Nothing goes through.
You’d have more success pissing into the wind and staying dry.
If they start buying up on-line dictionaries we will be in real trouble
In event of war cache them underground. Do not let them destroy our vast libraries nor our own personal libraries.
Salut dear friend.
Christmas gift: Simon Say's Game (happy go lucky games inc)
Open box
Lift out game rules pamphlet.
Read rules:
Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, "The Science", NHS, gubbermint goonz, bullets, tazers, mental health Act, Media/Medusa are "SIMON"
Player 1 must roll both dice to achieve movement accross board. Land on SimonSays....your out, game over, your the loser.
Check game components:
Syringe, alcohol swab....sachet of scented "facism".
Rubber gloves, "fear monger" face guard, undertaker coupon, glow-in-dark potion in glass vial, death certificate....
The last two weeks have brought three new studies finding negative efficacy for two vaccine doses, meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated . These are study findings, not raw data, so have been adjusted for various biases and confounders, making it harder to dismiss them as anomalous or skewed.Some people just don't get it ...
Scepticism is good, but not enough.
If you don't here is what some of the very few autopsies have found: [Link] and the report : [Link]
The mRNA products damage your body's immune system, and you need to get the "vaccine" out of your system ASAP ...I think the mRNA shtick is just a red herring - there is nothing like that in the shots, only a brew of slow-acting poisons. Not that I can prove it, though. But the EUA implies Pfizer/Moderna don't need to fully disclose the contents.
And there is my point - if you don't get that this shots were solely designed to kill you, you are lost. Literally ...
Then, they tell me I need a booster because the original jab isn't as "Safe and effective".
They say I'm a danger to society if I don't take the jab.
They also say that if I take the jab, I can still contract and spread the virus.
They say even if I'm jabbed I still need to wear a mask.
They said if i did as I was told it would be a "passport" to freedom.
Seems like the last line is the most honest, only folks who complied are still trying to reach that freedom( carrot )
I'm not sure if your were aware of the difference, I actually only looked up the definition of Efficacy for the first time today as in comments I've always used effective and effectiveness
Efficacy is the ability to produce a desired or intended result ... we know the intended result is not to provide immunity (which means the ability to be infected, which in turns means no ability to transmit)
Without really knowing what the intended result is, it is best that we judge them by their actions, such as the insane lust to jab kids
"As three more studies show NEGATIVE vaccine effectiveness, when will health authorities face up to what the data is telling us?"
And the obvious answer is:
As soon as the taxpayer-sourced money spigot dries up, and the elites can say to us: "Sorry, looks like the funds for Social Security and all other social safety nets are all gone."
(But there will always be money for the MIC, Wall Street bailouts, and Israel, so no worries there.....)
Seems to me like everyone who got vaxed is on a slow road to getting AIDS.
Fauci was responsible for the AIDS debacle in the 80’s and now this vax. This vax slowly removes your immune system over time. I’m not sure if this is true but this virus has been manipulated apparently incorporating the same method as AIDS uses to gain entry to a cell.I know a guy who got a jab, he got a type of blood cancer from it, strange thing was I remember his sister telling me he had to have a HIV test, thing is he has been married for decades (has 3 children) and never played around clean living etc...doesnt smoke or do drugs (neither promiscuous nor homosexual nor reusing needles/drug addict etc) and I remember asking her wtf was the HIV test for....
Seems to me like everyone who got vaxed is on a slow road to getting AIDS.
Now I know.
Curse_of_Canaan That says to me that they’re half expecting to find cases of HIV. Evil.
codis The sad thing is even after these people die, even their families may still refuse to see the wood for the trees. My brother and his wife still refuse to blame the vaccine. They’ve done some quite magnificent mental gymnastics as they now believe that his 3 massive brain bleeds was caused by simple old age. The fact he had recently had his second jab is just a strange coincidence. I’ve learned to leave it so I can maintain some sort of relationship with them.
It turns out that my brother has refused the jabs. I thought he was lying to me because he said as much to me for ages and I thought he just didn’t want to admit it (my dad did the same) but it turns out that he actually hasn’t. Not for any of the myriad of reasons I gave him, but because he is a heavy drinker and is on the larger side, not exactly fat but robust if you understand what i mean? Being fat and a heavy drinker was probably the only two reasons I hadn’t warn him about. Either way I’m glad he remains PureBlooded.
And here is one of many articles I found about testing positive for HIV [Link]
The sad thing is even after these people die, even their families may still refuse to see the wood for the trees. My brother and his wife still refuse to blame the vaccine. They’ve done some quite magnificent mental gymnastics as they now believe that his 3 massive brain bleeds was caused by simple old age.I have seen more than one video (I think even on YT) where people were rushed to the hospital shortly after the shot. And either they or their family member, while still in critical conditions, spouted the "you need to get the shot" propaganda from the ICU bed.
Not much to add here. As I mentioned yesterday, there were diehard Nazis still believing in the Endsieg when Russian troups poured into the Berlin streets. Ze Germans were not at all special in that regard, as it turns out.
Being fat and a heavy drinker was probably the only two reasons I hadn’t warn him about. Either way I’m glad he remains PureBlooded.Having some addiction issues or being not the smartest has no relation to the amount of common sense, it seems. I'm glad for you ...
And here is one of many articles I found about testing positive for HIV [Link]If you got the time, check out Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman to the topic of germ theory, viruses, and the PCR test. Highly recommended.
Since the "virus isolation" procedure includes splitting it up into tiny fragments and "recreating" it's genome through "creative" software algorithms, you will find any virus in any such bacterial culture.
Virology is as fraudulent as black holes and dark matter.
That last sentence caught my attention, re fraudulent black hole bit. I’m intrigued with that? It’s a new one for me, and I always like new things to look into
Most of his videos are reposted about a dozen times ...
He explains the incredible weak basis of contemporary virology and the fraudulent and self-deluding "virus isolation" procedure in several videos.
That last sentence caught my attention, re fraudulent black hole bit. I’m intrigued with that? It’s a new one for me, and I always like new things to look intoBlack holes and dark matter are basically the end point of a theory represented by a certain jewish poster boy, who started as out as failure and became the figurehead of relativity - mostly by plagiarism and fraud.
Both "effects" solely rest on singularities in certain physical equations, i.e. were the denominator becomes zero. Problem is, the map is not the landscape, and an empirical equation is not the very representation of nature.
My math lecturer emphatically warned us several times against guys that claim to have those divisions by zero solved...
...and the whole schism in order to follow a guy who peaked at 26, and spent the rest of his life trying to justify his erroneous thinking ...As far as I know the legal battle of his ex-wife's family is still ongoing. It is basically acknowledged fact that his Nobel-prize honored article was (ghost-) written by his then-wife Mileva Marić. Whom he soon divorced afterwards., that petty-minded crook.
It's insane.
RC
when will health authorities face up to what the data is telling us?Once 80% of the population is culled in order to fulfill 1 of the 10 guidelines of The Georgia Guidestones. (Maintain Humanity Under 500 Million In Perpetual Balance With Nature.)
The elites seem to believe in Malthusian philosophy which dictates that population numbers must be controlled in order to prevent our demise. The elites have crowned themselves the executors of this plan to "Save Humanity". Isn't it nice that they appointed themselves the arbiters of planet earth? What if its you and yours who've they decided must go?
Happy New Year!
RC
Rowan Cocoan they just wish we'd screw up and take the jabCorrect! Karma exist. If we willingly took the jab because we were willfully ignorant or coerced, that was our own personal choice. Deception or not, being fooled is your own dilemma.
Being coerced is the toughest moral situation one can be in. I can't even fault someone who takes the jab to keep their job. Will their bravery make you feed and house them?
In reluctant defence of the "vaccine", from a statistical pov only, how likely are Purebloods going to test themselves anyway? I simply wouldn't dream of taking a test whereas we hear of all these "vaccinated"/boosted people getting several tests per day
On a similar subject, what it the point of a thermometer (if one does not have kids)