
A new publication in the renowned journal Lancet, by Burkart et al studied 65 million deaths in 9 countries occurring between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016 in relation to temperature effects.
The researchers found that 17 of the 176 categories for the cause of death "showed J-shaped relationships with daily temperature, whereas the risk of external causes (eg, homicide, suicide, drowning, and related to disasters, mechanical, transport, and other unintentional injuries) increased monotonically with temperature."
The 17 causes of death with J-shaped curves (dependent of temperature) included heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, lower respiratory infection, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Using the data, the team of authors extrapolated the results to the entire global population and examined the year 2019.
The authors estimate in 2019, "the average cold-attributable mortality exceeded heat-attributable mortality in all countries for which data were available." Cold effects were most pronounced in China and in New Zealand.
In China a population attributable fraction (PAF) from cold effects was 4·3% (3·9-4·7) and the attributable rates were 32.0 deaths (27.2-36.8) per 100,000. But when looking at the heat effects in China, the PAF was only 0·4% and the attributable rates were 3·25 deaths per 100 000. In other words, cold death rates were about 10 times higher than heat deaths.
In South Africa, the authors attributed almost 20 times more deaths to cold than to heat (8372 vs 453)!

Are these findings being blared out by the mainstream media? No, of course not. And why not? It's because they don't want people to know what's really going on.



Reader Comments
That plus plants like hot weather, they don't grow in ice too well.
so even if you can stay warm you'll starve do death. Smh.
SBC et al. who minimize heat, you've not walked around here with a temperature of 98 and 98% humidity. It's super brutal.
Of course(someone has to say it) By, appropriately, Frost.
RC
dude you only THINK you'd rather freeze.
Meanwhile, my 'normal' temperature is 96.8F and yet, I radiate a LOT of heat.
RC
btw I wear shorts and a t-shirt in the freezer when I work. People think I'm nuts. I understand your cold anecdote. Even at that, three hours in I'm done.
If I had to choose, it would still be ice. Let us pray we have kind endings watching some better world erupting.
RC
I'd actually be far more concerned with 100F and lower than 50% humidity, because then you don't know you're becoming dehydrated. It just doesn't feel as hot with that low humidity, so you might not remember to stay hydrated.
RC
all known forms of life are based on Carbon.
warm air is capable of holding more moisture than cold air.
and while RC is 98.6F, he is not comfortable at that temp. and prefers 72F @ 55% relative humidity.
energy can be defined as potential difference. as it does not exist until it flows...
[Link]
RC
and you want me to tell you how to unlock the thermostat?
[Link]
Cold causes blood to thicken and clots to increase
At 0K there is no matter, nor energy. Nothing. Just the stillness of an empty universe.
are you aware that the subject matter is heat? and if so. what can you tell me about it? anything?
or, are you just here to be rude?
[Link]
Then again, for some arctic tribes, 'hell' was perceived to be cold. I guess (I actually know) that I've spent too much time down here - I've still got my AC going.
RC