What the emails have revealed is what we in the alternative media have been saying since the beginning - Fauci has been talking out of both sides of his mouth, saying one thing in private correspondence while telling the nation, and indeed the world, something entirely different.
Overall, Fauci was told about the credible theory that Covid was leaked from a lab, having telltale signs of being an engineered virus early in the Covid circus, despite vehemently denying the possibility in public and actively worked within his organization to downplay the lab leak theory and promote the evolutionary origin teory. He was also well aware that masks were essentially useless for stopping viral spread.
Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we delve into this and more. What has been revealed in the Fauci emails?
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f
And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:
♥https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16H-nK-N0ANdsA5JFTT12_HU5nUYRVS9YcQh331dG2MI/edit?usp=sharing
Running Time: 00:40:46
Download: MP3 — 37.3 MB
Reader Comments
Summarising one of the more important parts of Yeadon's discussion, there are three fundamental questions explaining why reactions to the shank are so varied:
1. Where does the shank end up in the subject's body?
A person whose shank remains mostly in the muscle cells of their arm will be less affected than one whose shank travels the circulatory system to the brain or heart (or elsewhere).
2. How much of the shank is taken up by the cells in the subject's body?
A person whose shank is widely taken up by their cells, for whatever reason, will have radically different outcome to someone whose shank its not widely taken up by the cells.
3. What amount of 'spike protein' is consequently manufactured by the cells?
Even after taking up the production code (mRNA or adenovirus vector), a cell might produce a little or a lot of 'spike protein'. When combined with location, this can have mild to fatal results.
Yeadon notes that all three points are entirely absent from any and all safety discussions of the shanks, irregardless of manufacturer.
Soak human ovaries in shank spikes for 20+ days and what happens? Probably nothing good .
RC
So the tech does have promise, but for serious/fatal diseases on a case by case evaluation.
Obviously not something for a survival rate over 99% and into millions of people in an unregulated and illegal phase 3 trial.
Thank you!
RC
Nada, infra:
The theme is seems to be prevalent. Things that can help society and humanity as a whole get corrupted, perverted, and inverted for the sake of power and control.You add a holistic view. Excellent!
RC
These are greatly on the ball!!
Daily
[Link]
Weekly
[Link]
[Link]
Stormie has a year-full of Eat n Greets, amazing videos. She also initiated a free year-long bi-weekly Astrology Youtube University, do at your pace courses. EXTRA GREAT. Called KICKSTARTERS
FullMoon/NewMoon Astrology
[Link]
Brilliant Divination
[Link]
[Link]
RC
many including Foucault demonstrated that concepts of illness, sexualtiy, power are culturally determined
why do only north amerikans have this as Geoffrey Gorer wrote "a patterned courtship ritual described as dating where they are required to meet in public spaces several occasions before they copulate"?
Next:
why do amerikans complain about pain more than any people?Why do you constantly complain about what you've read about Americans? Have you ever even fucking been here? I've personally known well over ten thousand (easily) Americans. Have you?
why do north amerikans consume more coke, heroin marijuana, meth, hallucinogens per capita than all peoples?Have you ever even fucking done ANY of them? I have. What do you wish to know? Until then, please spare me your uninformed words which I guess are your 'opinions', for whatever that's worth, which ain't much.
RC
why have amerikans consumed 80+% of the legal psychotropics and 66% of the anti-depressants on earth in the past decade?1) WTF is a 'legal' psychotropic? Where and when? I'd guess that SSRI's (which you are apparently referencing) have not been approved in many countries. Here's some proven physically addictive psychotropic drugs: caffeine. (You stop using it, you get a headache.) Alcohol. (Drink too much and you can get the DT's.) Here's one of countless that is more psychologically addictive: BAKING SODA! (People who love burping have gotten so addicted to water mixed with NaHCO3 that if they went cold turkey* they would have died.)
why do only north amerikans consider a color to be depression---blue? or another color to be cowardice, yellow?2) Maybe you've never heard of our 'blues' music? Created by our poor oppressed brethren?
Argh!
RC
*It's an Americanism. Look it up.
Ps, Kid, I don't want to, but I'm about to give up on you.
rc
He's almost never used capitals and ALWAYS (as far as I'm aware) described us all as 'amerikans'. He further lumps us all together, all the time, 24/7/366.
He routinely would initially post series of quotes from people who I would consider 'modern Marxists'. One IRRITATING thing that he's routinely done is posting such quotes which the originals of say America or American etc. WITH the C changed to a K.
I had some hopes for the kid but . . .
I would LOVE to read a reply from him that addresses what I pointed out in my above reply to him, but I don't expect it. Oh well.
RC
why do only north amerikans have this as Geoffrey Gorer wrote "a patterned courtship ritual described as dating where they are required to meet in public spaces several occasions before they copulate"?
Source: Thomas Jefferson UniversityIt would strongly suggest the mRNA jab can alter our DNA after all - just like them 'spiracy theory-ists sed all along!
Summary: In a discovery that challenges long-held dogma in biology, researchers show that mammalian cells can convert RNA sequences back into DNA , a feat more common in viruses than eukaryotic cells.
Thought it worth copy/pasting the whole article here...
Cells contain machinery that duplicates DNA into a new set that goes into a newly formed cell. That same class of machines, called polymerases, also build RNA messages, which are like notes copied from the central DNA repository of recipes, so they can be read more efficiently into proteins. But polymerases were thought to only work in one direction DNA into DNA or RNA. This prevents RNA messages from being rewritten back into the master recipe book of genomic DNA. Now, Thomas Jefferson University researchers provide the first evidence that RNA segments can be written back into DNA, which potentially challenges the central dogma in biology and could have wide implications affecting many fields of biology.
"This work opens the door to many other studies that will help us understand the significance of having a mechanism for converting RNA messages into DNA in our own cells," says Richard Pomerantz, PhD, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at Thomas Jefferson University. "The reality that a human polymerase can do this with high efficiency, raises many questions." For example, this finding suggests that RNA messages can be used as templates for repairing or re-writing genomic DNA.
The work was published June 11th in the journal Science Advances.
Together with first author Gurushankar Chandramouly and other collaborators, Dr. Pomerantz's team started by investigating one very unusual polymerase, called polymerase theta. Of the 14 DNA polymerases in mammalian cells, only three do the bulk of the work of duplicating the entire genome to prepare for cell division. The remaining 11 are mostly involved in detecting and making repairs when there's a break or error in the DNA strands. Polymerase theta repairs DNA, but is very error-prone and makes many errors or mutations. The researchers therefore noticed that some of polymerase theta's "bad" qualities were ones it shared with another cellular machine, albeit one more common in viruses -- the reverse transcriptase. Like Pol theta, HIV reverse transcriptase acts as a DNA polymerase, but can also bind RNA and read RNA back into a DNA strand.
In a series of elegant experiments, the researchers tested polymerase theta against the reverse transcriptase from HIV, which is one of the best studied of its kind. They showed that polymerase theta was capable of converting RNA messages into DNA, which it did as well as HIV reverse transcriptase, and that it actually did a better job than when duplicating DNA to DNA. Polymerase theta was more efficient and introduced fewer errors when using an RNA template to write new DNA messages, than when duplicating DNA into DNA, suggesting that this function could be its primary purpose in the cell.
The group collaborated with Dr. Xiaojiang S. Chen's lab at USC and used x-ray crystallography to define the structure and found that this molecule was able to change shape in order to accommodate the more bulky RNA molecule -- a feat unique among polymerases.
"Our research suggests that polymerase theta's main function is to act as a reverse transcriptase," says Dr. Pomerantz. "In healthy cells, the purpose of this molecule may be toward RNA-mediated DNA repair. In unhealthy cells, such as cancer cells, polymerase theta is highly expressed and promotes cancer cell growth and drug resistance. It will be exciting to further understand how polymerase theta's activity on RNA contributes to DNA repair and cancer-cell proliferation."
RC