Bob Unruh
WNDMon, 01 Mar 2021 03:37 UTC
© ScreenshotAttorney Sidney Powell
One week ago,
the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review two Pennsylvania cases challenging the validity of votes in the 2020 election, and on Monday it
rejected two petitions from attorney Sidney Powell with no explanation.Powell had promised in the aftermath of the Nov. 3 election to "release the Kraken," with lawsuits that would blow up the claim that the vote count was legitimate.
Her lawsuits were rejected on procedural grounds, however, and her claims never got traction.But her confidence that the election was invalid is unshaken. She
told Erskine Radio in an interview Saturday that
there is "more than enough evidence in the public now to more than reverse the election in at least five states."Powell said the
existence of "fractionalized votes" weighted in favor of Joe Biden, created by a computer algorithm, can be proved in multiple counties. And it could be proved across the country, she said,
"if anybody would issue an order allowing inspection of the machines."
"There's all kind of precedent for fixing what happened in this election from Bush vs. Gore to other cases as well," she said,
the Gateway Pundit reported."
She noted that federal law calls for election records to be kept for 22 months.
"In this case it requires forensic evaluations of the machines and looking at all of the paper ballots. We already know that's not going to match up. There were counterfeit ballots. People were saying, 'Oh, well they did a full audit in Georgia.' Well, if you just keep running the same counterfeit bill through the same counting machine you're going to get the same result."
Comment: And...nothing changed.
The Fraud Will Stand.
Last Monday the United States Supreme Court refused to review the Pennsylvania 2020 Election cases. The court made the announcement on Monday morning.
Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented from the denial.
On Monday, following their inaction last week, the US Supreme Court rejected without comment or explanation, lingering 2020 election challenges by Attorney Sidney Powell in Arizona and Wisconsin.
The Supreme Court rejected two mandamus petitions that Sidney Powell and other "Kraken"-aligned lawyers filed in late December. Those cases were stylized as In re Tyler Bowyer, et al. and In Re William Feehan. The cases took issue with the election results in Arizona and Wisconsin, where Trump lost to Joe Biden.
"The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied," the court said Monday. That's it, that's the order.
The matter-of-factness and brevity stands in stark contrast to the urgency and "public importance" that the lawyers communicated in the since-dismissed petitions. Each of the mandamus petitions said:
"A submission directly to this Court seeking an extraordinary writ of mandamus is unusual, but it has its foundation. While such relief is rare, this Court will grant it 'where a question of public importance is involved, or where the question is of such a nature that it is peculiarly appropriate that such action by this Court should be taken."
See also:
Supreme Court still sees no steal, again declines to hear Trump lawsuit against Pennsylvania's dodgy election rule changes
Comment: And...nothing changed. The Fraud Will Stand. See also:
Supreme Court still sees no steal, again declines to hear Trump lawsuit against Pennsylvania's dodgy election rule changes