OF THE
TIMES
ClintWestwood Re: "Why so sure it was the Taliban? Could have easily been the CIA as well." Even moreso since the 'differences' between ISIS/IL/ Team-ILL / 'Al Quaeda' / The Taliban / CIA are all provided by their creators at the CIA. Those 'differences' are breathlessly whispered as "secret MSNBCNNBBCBS exclusive" (video of a shadowed man* behind a translucent shower door "Intel insider says....(verbaitm draft by CIA) read as 'news".R.C.
But as to The CIA are determined not to give up thei their "heroin plants"? - i f they're growing those, why bother with the poppies?Jesting and jest having some fun.
So I did some research and Google only allowed me to go to wee wee pee pee aaahhh which says:
Plantus Heroinus. This genetically modified shrub represents an ever increasing proportion of world heroin sales. It is a biannual.
As it grows, at around 3 feet, it begins dispensing clear little biodegradeable and watertight "balloons" of 5% to 40% heroin with 95 to 60% of mannitol, coffee creamer or similar. At six feet, it produces similarly wrapped ounces of 80% pure heroin;
At 10 feet they put out fully fruited bodies of watertight kilos, which hang like ripe fruit over the CIA's mercenary'soldiers' heads..
CW: I read that and when I saw it was you, I figured you almost certainly meant 'plants' as in 'production facilities'. On top of that, even if it wasn't you, the post alone showed erudite cluefulness, so even if it was a name I didn't know, the simple fact they'd be posting that post here would mean odds of way better than 95% they meant production facilities. (Otherwise, why would the CIA care about one but not the other? After all, there'd be no economic gain to have to fly out raw opium when its weight is reduced to one tenth or less when converted to heroin. [ Link ] I’d likewise guess that its density decreases its space occupied by another 50% on top of that. But the opportunity for a chuckle remained. And I always enjoy a stab at google and wee wee pee pee ahh.)I apologize if you deem such appropriate. ( I try to always say what I mean and mean what I say.) And as I type that mantra, I believe I should have noted that - beyond 'jesting' - that I was being facetious, also. So I do apologize.
If, on the other hand, that was some typical prole post at MSM dot com, etc., maybe it’d be a 50/50 shot and that erring half would be 'ripe for pickin'.
As above, there are too few 'opportunities’ for a chuckle these days. I hope I made clear the joke wasn't 'on you' but was having fun and letting some junkie’s imagination take off on the 'opportune turn of a phrase.'
Besides. Is US in war with Afghanistan. Where is the decision by congress that is needed for war by the constitution?