© Global Look / G Ronaldo Lopez
"Fact-checking" site Snopes has been vindicated in its decision to fact-check satire by a study proving people (especially Republicans) often mistake satirical site
Babylon Bee for real news. Or has it? Claim rated: mostly false.
The "five most-believed satirical claims by the Babylon Bee" fool up to 28 percent of Republican readers, according to a study conducted by the Conversation (and credulously reposted by Snopes). The study's conclusions appeared at first glance to validate Snopes' much-mocked decision to fact-check obviously satirical stories by the
Bee - clearly, Snopes' detractors simply didn't realize how many people were incapable of recognizing political satire!
But the researchers didn't present their subjects with
Babylon Bee headlines and ask them if they thought they were looking at real news.
Instead, they paraphrased the "false claims," ironing out the satire in a way that - ironically - made them look more like real news, as the Bee's own editor in chief pointed out.
The study didn't focus entirely on the
Bee -
the Onion got the same paraphrasing treatment, and up to 14 percent of Democrats believed some of its claims (including one story in which National Security Advisor John Bolton calls an attack on Saudi oil tankers "an attack on all Americans," which - let's face it - wouldn't look out of place in the
Washington Post). And its conclusions were reasonable enough, suggesting fact-checking sites label satire as satire, instead of "false."
But the post revived the ongoing battle between the
Bee - whose humor leans conservative - and Snopes - whose "fact-checking" leans liberal - and inflamed Twitter as
people on both sides wondered who, exactly, was taking Bee stories like "CNN purchases industrial-size washing machine to spin news" seriously. Besides Snopes, which fact-checked that story last year.
"Even by Snopes standards this is hopelessly desperate and depraved," one user
tweeted. Several tore into Snopes as "fake news,"
calling its "vicious and bizarre war" against the
Bee "beyond parody."
Many reposted their favorite
Bee headlines, and made suggestions for other stories Snopes could fact-check.
Others called Snopes out for political bias,
pointing out that "the Onion has been doing this same thing since 1988 and your 'unbiased' fact checking website has chosen to critique a 3 year old satire outlet as problematic instead." Several
accused the outlet of trying to get the
Bee deplatformed.
Snopes did finally capitulate to common sense and create a "labeled satire" rating earlier this month for sites like the
Bee after getting slammed for "fact-checking" a satirical article about a Georgia lawmaker mishearing "my pleasure" as "go back to your country," but the partisan rivalry refuses to die. Critics argue the new label smears satirical content by suggesting it isn't "real" satire.
So Snopes picked out some carefully chosen summaries, that do correlate with real events, just a little exaggerated.
The way they are written almost no social justice warrior, nor normal tow the party line democrat will believe it due to their obstinance in believing anything that doesn't align with their world view. The five instances they asked about DID happen, just not quite in the specific manner that they were presented as happening.
They stacked the deck so to speak.
I have seen so many videos of dumb ass liberals believing whatever was told to them, or thinking that quotes from hitler were from obama. stuff like that, that i know their are stupid stupid people on both sides, sometimes the higher of an education they have, they dumber they are..
Snopes is complete self serving garbage.