OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
May I point out English troops are already in Gaza, being injured and killed by Hamas. They are flown out to Princess Maryโs hospital in RAF...
As Awordinyourear, I must confess to speaking quietly. A whisper only needs truth to reach other minds. As for missiles.Why are they called such...
Z, you make me smile on an early Sunday morn' [Link] Geniesse Deinen Sonntag <3
Hockey sticks at the ready! Carbon Capture is a very nice phrase but it means absolutely nothing. The EPA says that its rules won't affect the...
Those professionals working in the hospitals during 'covid' had nothing to do, so they posted lame videos of themselves doing pathetic dance...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
Thinking about tradition, repetition, and novelty. I think that the emergence of novelty, should expand on, and/or improve the tradition, and not destroy it, at least at the social cultural level. Today's SJWs for example, seem hellbent on destroying just about everything. Which sort of brings into the equation, the influence of pathogens and ponerology. I guess at the scientific level, novelty could overthrow an existing paradigm that is flawed, like Darwinism? I think what I am saying is, for changes to be evolutionary, novelty doesn't delete repetition/stability. Novelty enhances, expands, improves.
I like the idea that the human mind is in a "symbiotic relationship" with the information field, (for want of a better term)? That consciousness introduces novelty, depending on the level of consciousness, of course.
Damn! I wish I'd written that!
Well stated, sir, well stated.
R.C.
R.C.
Jest joshing. (And I don't recall reading that previously.) Thus, thank you!
R.C.
[Link]