OF THE
TIMES
If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?
But Americans, Zionist bankers, the media, the oligarchs, all want WW3. So why not give them what’s necessary, all banks taken back under...
They should allow Macron to send troops into Ukraine. Most don’t realise, Macron all by himself lost the revenue streams from many...
The recent revelations that our Facebook chats could be scrutinized by a CIA-backed company underline a chilling reality in our digital age, where...
'Israel Destroys Gaza to Control World’s Most Important Shipping Lane' [Link]
في الكازينو، أنت ترقص مع الصدفة مع كل رمية نرد وخلط أوراق اللعب. يملأ الشعور بالتوقعات الهواء حيث تتلاقى الفرصة والتخطيط هنا. [Link] عندما تكون...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
Thinking about tradition, repetition, and novelty. I think that the emergence of novelty, should expand on, and/or improve the tradition, and not destroy it, at least at the social cultural level. Today's SJWs for example, seem hellbent on destroying just about everything. Which sort of brings into the equation, the influence of pathogens and ponerology. I guess at the scientific level, novelty could overthrow an existing paradigm that is flawed, like Darwinism? I think what I am saying is, for changes to be evolutionary, novelty doesn't delete repetition/stability. Novelty enhances, expands, improves.
I like the idea that the human mind is in a "symbiotic relationship" with the information field, (for want of a better term)? That consciousness introduces novelty, depending on the level of consciousness, of course.
Damn! I wish I'd written that!
Well stated, sir, well stated.
R.C.
R.C.
Jest joshing. (And I don't recall reading that previously.) Thus, thank you!
R.C.
[Link]