OF THE
TIMES
The questions for me, could an SUV drive though traffic, in what appears to be a normal traffic flow, cause so much devastation and loss of life, surely given the that most modern cars nowadays the outer exterior, bumpers and such are made of fiberglass or some other such composite, would have crumpled on first impact with anybody/person.It sure can when its driven on a pavement/sidewalk with people on it, the bumpers and crumple zones are to minimize life threatening injuries to the occupants of the vehicle, they absorb the impact that would otherwise be transfered to the occupants, then the airbags reduce possibility of injury further but its for the occupants not pedestrians.
The perpetrator of course died at the scene, true to course, justice is done. He died, well that may be good for some, but as we all know dead men tell no lies or maybe it should be dead men tell no truthsI don't mean to be rude Joan but the guy injured some 40 people then went to work with two knives, killing a police officer and three civilians what should the Police have done wrestled him to the ground so that the usual suspects like Fetzer etc will be satisfied its not a "Gladio" false flag?
The questions for me, could an SUV drive though traffic, in what appears to be a normal traffic flow, cause so much devastation and loss of life, surely given the that most modern cars nowadays the outer exterior, bumpers and such are made of fiberglass or some other such composite, would have crumpled on first impact with anybody/person.
To cause such devastating injuries, even throwing a victim off the bridge and into the Thames as reported cause such devastation, so many life threating injuries and loss of life.
So my questions are what the hell happened? Are we being told the truth?
The perpetrator of course died at the scene, true to course, justice is done. He died, well that may be good for some, but as we all know dead men tell no lies or maybe it should be dead men tell no truths.