Health & Wellness
Hayes has been fighting Syngenta, to report the harmful effects of Atrazine for decades now. His scientific papers describe how Atrazine demasculinizes male gonads producing testicular lesions associated with reduced germ cell numbers in teleost fish, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals, and induces partial and/or complete feminization in fish, amphibians, and reptiles. These effects are strong (statistically significant), consistent across vertebrate classes, and specific. Reductions in androgen levels and the induction of estrogen synthesis - demonstrated in fish, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals - represent plausible and coherent mechanisms that explain these effects.
Big Ag Targets a Truth Teller
Other scientists have since come forward to corroborate Hayes' claims, but not until after Syngenta dumped a 102-page document trying to discredit the scientist.
Atrazine is used on everything from corn fields (75 percent of them are sprayed with Atrazine in the US) to Christmas tree farms, and it is one of the most pervasive chemicals in agriculture. Syngenta actually asked Hayes to research the chemical, but after he found results which the manufacturer of atrazine didn't expect, he was targeted in ways that, sadly, have become familiar to whistleblowers.
Lead, Fluoride, and Now Atrazine
In typical biowarfare-fashion, this chemical is being used everywhere, and while we fret about fluoride and lead, rightfully so, in our drinking water, an even more sinister chemical is being forced into our ground water, eventually seeping into municipal water supplies.
Atrazine affects men adversely, by literally shrinking their gonads, or causing them to effectively become women, but it also affects women, causing low estrogen levels and irregular menstruation. All in all, this chemical acts exactly as many other UN Agenda poisons do - from chemtrails to vaccines, BPAs which are known xenoestrogens, to pharmaceuticals, including birth control pills that pass unharmed through sewage systems into in our drinking water - it makes fertility a genetic Russian roulette.
Are we to believe that a chemical that causes complete chemical castration in male African clawed frogs, isn't eventually going to have similar effects on us? More than 80 million pounds of this stuff is used annually, but with all the false-flag attempts, and Flint, Michigan water crises, who can keep up with the numerous ways they are trying to cull the masses?
The population of the US is supposed to DROP 78.2% from 316+ million now to ONLY 69 million people in 2025 according to a government website, and many have made statements admitting they want to lessen the earth's population numbers.
Even the CDC in December 2014, offered the shocking comparison in population totals from 2007 to 2013, where they state "There were 3.93 million births in the United States in 2013, down less than 1% from 2012 and 9% from the 2007 high. The U.S. general fertility rate was at an all-time low in 2013."
Is this the real reason Tyrone Hayes is being targeted?
He says we're making 'toxic babies' due to the largest selling chemical poison from one of the largest chemical companies in the world. It's banned in the EU, but still used copiously in the US, even re-registered by the Environmental Protection Agency in the very same year it was banned overseas. 0.1 parts per billion exposure to Atrazine is changing a frog's sex. How many parts per billion will it take to turn off your reproductive ability? Maybe its time to listen to Mr. Hayes.
Comment: Read more about Dr. Tyrone Hayes
- The Frog of War
- Is there Atrazine in your drinking water?
- Dr. Tyrone Hayes: The scientist who took on a leading herbicide manufacturer
Reader Comments
Ruth,WE don't 'need' Chemtrails but 'they' do. Sure we've got " Big Agra and Big Pharma" but if anyone concludes that be all the tricks in 'their' bag, they be mistaken.
I know that questioning the obvious CT's over our heads and, more importantly, their causes and reasons - is rarely a favored subject here, but the proof is there for all who can see and keep their eyes to the skies. As a son of an Ornithologist, and Ecologists and Aeronautical Engineers, I've always done exactly that.
I was just clearing out the pics on my cell phone, and there some CT pics and I came across two pics i'd taken of CT's classically inexplicable patterns, such as two planes at approximately same levels, with one spouting a classical contrail . . a faint mist that disappeared about 10 plane lengths behind it, while others extended for miles and miles.Then you'll see a trail like this
------------------ ---- - --- ---- --------------
where when the trail restarts, it's at the exact same level as it were before (which if it had engine shut down, the restart would be at a lower line across the sky and would likely be downward heading at the 'restart' of the engine.etc.)
Likewise, living near the coast, you'll routinely see (when upper level winds are moving onshore) the most seaward trail running parallell Southward a mile or three out to sea, with a series of east / west trails that suddenly terminate and/or begin at that N/S line such as this...
|
^ N ^ (Easternmost CT going N/S)
(Note the Horizontal (E/W CT's cut off at " x|x " )
(Land) (Shore []) Ocean (~~~~)
(Land) NS-CT3 CT2, Shore CT1
E/W CT A-> ----|-----------|--------[]-------x|x ~~~Sea~~~~~~~~~~
E/W CT B-> ----|------------|-------[]-------x|x ~~~~~~Sea~~~~~~
E/W CT C-> ----|------------|-------[]--------x|x .~~~~~~Sea~~~~~~
E/W CT D-> ----|------------|-------[]--------.x|x .~~~~Sea~~~~~~~
Note how the E/W CT's will magically ''cut off' when Eastbound or "Cut on" when Westbound as soon as they cross the eastmost N/S CT)
See generally Geoengineering Watch at www.geoengineeringwatch.org.
The PTB will use as many tools as they can to achieve their nefarious ends.
R.C.
I honestly didn't think 'they' have as much control (as they'd like) over the 'geo' (Planet); engineering or otherwise. I'm sure they'd like to have it if they could. However, I don't actually think that it's an available option. I think there are other explanations for what people call chem-trails, but I am not a atmospheric physicist or a meteorologist.
deagle.com (what the heck is that, and why is it being quoted as a reputable source??):
"The population of the US is supposed to DROP 78.2% from 316+ million now to ONLY 69 million people in 2025 according to a government website, and many have made statements admitting they want to lessen the earth's population numbers. "
Edwin A. Deagle is some 85 year old CFR dude who seems to have his own website, deagle.com, hustling military hype/hardware. Who cares about his unsourced population projections??
That is, unless you want to SCARE people, then by all means quote it and reference it in some vague way as a government website, like this article does. Scaremongering.
US Census Bureau:
"Between 2014 and 2060, the U.S. population is pro-
jected to increase from 319 million to 417 million,
reaching 400 million in 2051. The U.S. population is
projected to grow more slowly in future decades than
in the recent past, as these projections assume that
fertility rates will continue to decline and that there will
be a modest decline in the overall rate of net inter-
national migration. "
Sterilization... isn't that the whole Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation setup? The ole population reduction scheme their kind have been practicing for a few generations now?