© The Excavator
Face it. In order for the PTBs to sufficiently take out mighty Iran, a vastly powerful nation, it will have to be with nukes. Iran has tremendous capabilities not only militarily, but is protected by natural, mountainous fortresses, and is strategically placed between two vulnerable US battlefields, and sufficiently close to Israel and even Europe to do some serious damage if and when attacked.
So if you're the aggressor, what would be your major concern about your target?
Retaliation.
And knowing the West is clearly itching to take out Iran, and knowing they have these capabilities and that your first strike needs to be incredibly devastating, what would justify such an action in the world's mind?
You got it. A supposed preemptive nuclear strike from Iran. Your archetypal false flag set up.
And the world will lap it up.This type of attack would never be done by a peaceful Iran knowing the consequences on its people. It would instead most likely be done by covert Israeli Mossad forces as we've seen before, perhaps even on their own people. Don't put it past them. They have the most to gain, as in 9/11. The gain outweighs the pain, in their minds.
It's been done before not only on 9/11, but Vietnam, Pearl Harbor, the Lusitania, Hitler's Reichstag fire, and a host of other false flag events through the years. No cost is too great for the next big prize to the Controllers.
If You Don't Get It Yet, It's Time You DidThe world is controlled, manipulated to the nth degree. Yes, there's freedom to some extent, like prisoners can roam the grounds or pace their cells, or watch TV like most of the world's voluntary prisoners. But we're being led by the nose down a path that's been described and articulated and even screamed from the hilltops for decades....yet few seem to notice.
They want war, they want chaos, they want excuses to modify society into a format they have predestined for us. And war brings about the quickest method for societal transformation. One look at the Patriot Act and you'll get it.
Comforting, eh?
The Nuke Option Is ClearMonstrous actions always conveniently beg monstrous responses. After all, they're "justified". 9/11 meant the utter devastation of both Afghanistan and Iraq in retaliation, and the blinded, bloodthirsty American populace now laugh at the death tallies of innocent Iraqis, Afghanis, Libyans, Pakistanis, Yemenis, Somalis, etc. as the war mongers march toward world domination.
After all, they're just rag heads, deviant Muslim whack jobs who are jealous of our enlightened freedoms. Who gives a damn.
Nicely Done, Eh?So why not ratchet the situation up a bit, especially if you'd like to see major chaos in the world in order to bring about some
"big idea" of world governance that can restore "law and order" after such devastation. That's the plan, and it has been for generations.
Just wanted to sum up the situation. If it's not clear by now, I don't know what to say.
Love, Zen
Not any more it won't. Pandorra's Box is not the sole possession of the West.
Once again, retaliation would entail much more than conventional strikes, and would escalate rapidly.
They don't call it the MAD doctrine for nothing. It is madness to contemplate the use of Nuclear Weapons for pre-emptive strike. Lo and behold, we have leaders who have apparently gone mad with what they can do. Unlike the Cuban Missile Crisis, this one will escalate upon first use to and eye for an eye.
You can kiss goodbye the Army in Afghanistan, as well as a handful of Aircraft Carriers and many base installations. The price of madness will accomplish the same effect on the Atlantic Fleet as Pearl Harbor was to the Pacific Fleet. The small (by world comparison) all-volunteer Army will be devastated for at least a 2 year period, and could no longer intervene effectively. Europe would be a sitting duck with it's small forces.
War is not a policy, it is the lack of a policy. The option of a last resort when faced with imminent threat. A threat which currently does not exist, but it will be created upon the use of first strike. Madness and the delerium of glorious war.
Even Bush backed off when faced with the consequences of attacking Iran.
Current leadership would have to be several orders of magnitude more foolish to actually go through with it. Are they (our fearless leaders) prepared to pay the awful price?
We'll have to wait and see. Troubled minds are most difficult to predict.