OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
Susan Michie "aka" Stalins Nanny, an aristocratic Marxist married to Robert West, Goverment Scientific advisor and co writer of the above quoted,...
'' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, of the Australian Labor Party, denounced him as an "arrogant billionaire." Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, from...
CJ Hopkins' description of the monster explains why so many of us feel powerless.
Highlander All pension funds are invested in stocks, bonds and shares. I was talking about the biggest private capitol holdings not specifically...
For those living in the US: The reality, wake up and smell the roses! Washington, DC., Red team, Blue Team, RFK Jr team; or, you name it whatever...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
This is BS.
--------
"The Hadza - hunter-gatherers native to northern Tanzania - have limited exposure to the mass media. Cut off from the daily bombardment of advertisements, pop songs and newscasts that's typical in much of the world, they were an ideal population in which to study innate sexual preferences, says Coren Apicella, an anthropologist at Harvard University and leader of the study."
"They're also an evolutionarily relevant population - they live like we lived 200,000 years ago," she says. "Most of our psychological preferences probably evolved when we were hunter-gatherers."
----------
In other words, *assume* that there is a biological preference which our current mass media overloads (nature vs. nurture). Ignore the possibility that this population has their own cultural biases which drive this preference.
"Most of our psychological preferences probably evolved when we were hunter-gatherers."
Um, based on what evidence? I particularly like the use of the word "probably"... which in this case seems to mean "I'm just making this sh*t up."