OF THE
TIMES
The court goes on to justify their rights violating and Stasi-esque ruling by claiming it's okay as long as the officer truly believes the subject of his lies has criminal intent.So long as the facts known to the officer establish reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop, the stop is lawful even if the officer falsely cites as the basis for the stop a ground that is not supported by reasonable suspicion.
We emphasize, however, that although our focus is on the objectively reasonable basis for the stop, not the officers' subjective intentions or beliefs, the facts justifying the stop must be known to officers at the time of the stop.
Comment: US police are already doing pretty much as they please with few repercussions. This new ruling will only reinforce their assumption of total impunity, and will no doubt prove to be quite lucrative by making is easier to seize assets.