On Friday, Taylor Swift's newest album,
Reputation, was released through Big Machine Records. But amid all the festivities surrounding the release, Swift quickly earned feminists' ire for refusing to take a stand on politics (i.e. not openly opposing Donald Trump).
Back in September,
PopFront editor Meghan Herning called out Swift for
supposedly supporting the White Supremacy movement because she refused to explicitly denounce white supremacy (and by extension, the President and his supporters). Herning asserted that Swift's silence was "calculated," and that her "silence in the face of injustice means support for the oppressor."
Basically, the piece was championing the notion that unless Swift openly came out in support of Hillary Clinton and "progressive politics," like so many others in her field (e.g. Katy Perry, Lady Gaga, Beyonce), she would be supporting white supremacy and empowering Trump supporters to continue their bigoted, homophobic, white supremacist ways.
Swift's lawyer immediately responded by
demanding a retraction on grounds of defamation of Swift's character, which ACLU of Northern California attorney Michael Risher claimed was "a completely unsupported attempt to suppress constitutionally protected speech."
Let me say that again: they think defaming Taylor Swift is protected speech.
Comment: From RT: