Almost 70 members of the former Libyan dictator's convoy were abused and executed after Gaddafi's own capture and death in the city of Sirte last October, the human rights group alleges.
The report - Death of a Dictator: Bloody Vengeance in Sirte - details Gaddafi's final hours and includes evidence that appears to prove captured pro-Gaddafi fighters caught attempting to leave the city, including Gaddafi's son Mutassim, were murdered.
Comment: Oh, so now they're militia forces?! First they were "al Qeada" (when they attacked us), then "Libyan rebels" (when we needed them for something we wanted), now "militias" (when they don't behave as we expect them to). Language for propaganda purposes sure is useful!
Comment: Taking one specific subset of psychopathy traits and applying them to all previous US presidents on the eve of presidential elections is tantamount to political propaganda intended to make it seem that having psychopaths for presidents is ok. It's not ok, it's extremely dangerous for the health of the nation. In addition, JFK and Carter do not belong on the same scale as Obama, Romney and the Bushes. You can do things that are psychopathic, but you cannot be 'a bit psychopathic'. A person either is or is not a psychopath. Psychopaths are fundamentally different from normal people; this isn't a matter of slightly different blends of personality traits - it's a matter of being human or being a total reaction machine. It is, of course, often extremely difficult to tell one from the other, but once you are able to see the difference and apply it to leaders or other famous people in world history, this fundamental difference becomes as clear as night and day.
The absurdity of this 'study' is shown by the fact that JFK, far and away America's most conscientious president in the past 100 years, came out second in this 'psychopathy test', while George W Bush, who is very probably a psychopath, came in at number 10: