Comment: We missed this report when it came out a month ago. As long-time SOTT readers know, Israel has a long, sordid history with organ-theft and corpse desecration, one which the media or monitoring bodies rarely talk about. So when news about such does seep to the surface, you can reasonably estimate that the extent of it taking place in Gaza right now must be vast and ghastly in scale...
© APPalestinians mourn their relatives killed in the Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip, in front of the morgue in Deir al Balah, Wednesday, Nov. 1, 2023.
Israel's army has been accused of stealing organs from the dead in Gaza by an NGO, which called for an independent international investigation.
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said on Sunday it had "concerns" about possible organ theft from Palestinian corpses, following reports by medical professionals in Gaza who examined some bodies after they were released by Israel.
The NGO claimed it has documented Israeli forces confiscating dozens of dead bodies from the al-Shifa and Indonesian hospitals in northern Gaza, alongside others in the south.
Medical professionals reportedly found vital organs, such as livers, kidneys and hearts, alongside cochleas and corneas, were missing, which the Euro-Med Monitor called "evidence" of potential organ theft.
They also claimed Israel exhumed and confiscated corpses from a mass grave that was dug more than 10 days ago in a courtyard at al-Shifa.
Comment: Christ in Heaven. If they dig up 10-day-dead bodies from mass graves, the organs extracted from such cannot possibly be used as transplants for the living. So what do they use them for??
The Israeli Defence Force has been approached for comment.
Israel has previously denied harvesting organs from dead Palestinians without the consent of families, calling such accusations "antisemitic".
Organ theft cannot be proven or disproven by forensic medical examination alone since multiple bodies underwent surgery prior to death, doctors at several Gaza hospitals were cited as saying by Euro-Med.
A full examination of the recovered corpses is not possible given the intense Israeli attacks on Gaza, they claimed. This follows comments by Palestinian health officials in Gaza that they can no longer even count the dead because the enclave's health system has collapsed.
Israel has long been accused of harvesting organs
Reports have circulated in recent years that Israel is unlawfully using Palestinian corpses.
In her book Over Their Dead Bodies, Israeli doctor Meira Weiss claimed organs were taken from dead Palestinians between 1996 and 2002 and used in medical research at Israeli universities and transplanted into Israeli patients' bodies.
Jewish teachings permit organ transplantation and harvesting, with the need to save lives paramount over all other religious commandments.
Comment: Ah, right, so that's fine then. "God said so." Except, the standard among normal people is that YOU CAN'T REMOVE THINGS OFF PEOPLE WITHOUT THEIR OR THEIR RELATIVES' CONSENT.
A controversial Israeli television investigation in 2014 included confessions from high-ranking officials that skin was taken from the bodies of dead Palestinians and African workers to treat Israelis, such as soldiers with burn injuries.
In it, the director of the Israeli Skin Bank revealed the country's reserve of "human skin" reached 17 square meters - a huge number relative to Israel's population.
Israel is thought to be the biggest hub for the illegal global trade in human organs, according to a 2008 investigation by the American CNN network.
Euro-Med Monitor claimed Israel is one of the "world's biggest hubs for the illegal trade of human organs under the pretext of 'security deterrence'".
It urged the country to abide by "international law" and reiterated the "necessity of respecting and protecting the bodies of the dead during armed conflicts."
The 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention, which Israel has not ratified, requires combatants to respect the dignity of the dead, including preventing despoiling, mutilation, or any disrespectful treatment of their bodies.
Palestinian bodies reportedly being withheld by Israeli forces
Euro-Med also accused Israel of holding the remains of dozens of Palestinians killed during its military operation in Gaza since 7 October, though some have been handed over to the International Committee of the Red Cross.
This is considered by some a punitive practice to deny families the chance of burying their loved ones.
Israel has a long history of holding onto the bodies of dead Palestinians, Euro-Med Monitor said.
It claimed Israel holds the remains of at least 145 Palestinians in its morgues and approximately 255 in its so-called "Numbers Cemetery", a site near the Jordanian border that is off-limits to the public.
Refusing to hand over the bodies of the dead to grieving families for burial may amount to collective punishment, which again is forbidden under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Euro-Med monitor pointed out.
Burying the dead is considered a fundamental and significant religious duty in Islam, which carries deep cultural and spiritual significance.
Reader Comments
Instead of "urging" why not try demanding, with consequences? Oh, yeah, it's the untouchables....
Research the Hebrew language symbol of Tet (Serpent & Vav). [Link]
The Mystery of Tet
Tet is a paradoxical letter in that it reveals both good (tov) and evil. The form of the letter is "inverted," suggesting hidden goodness, like that of a woman who is pregnant with child. However, sometimes the potential for goodness (tahorah) is perverted, and impurity or filth (tumah) results.
Just another coincidence it’s a number “9” I’m sure. The letter Tet is the ninth letter of the Aleph-Bet, having the numeric value of nine. The pictograph for Tet looks like a snake coiled inside a basket, whereas the classical Hebrew script is constructed of two preceding letters, Vav and Zayin, also joined and somewhat resembling a snake:
Critical thinkers will then know & understand how it’s rigged.
When the human race learns to read the language of symbolism, a great veil will fall from the eyes of men. Manly P. Hall
Good/bad, light/ darkness, as above- so below.
Anywhere the serpent is seen Adam and Eve should know that the message has a light of truth mixed with darkness of deception. Yin and Yang, sun and moon, summer and winter, male and female, hot and cold. Manley Hall, knew deep esoteric majik. Sex majik. So did Jack Parsons and Alistair Crowley, Madame blavatsky was a master of it. ALBERT Pike is the John Dee of all esoteric mystery schools of occult religions.
Lucifer took upon Himself the winged serpent to live in the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
The serpent symbol is the Master of deception.
The checker board black and white symbolism all over the TV displays who's deception it is...
Symbolism is everywhere and it's usually if not all the time a symbol of allegiance to the "man" as Bob Dylan called him, the devil, ruler of mammon thus ruler of all.
All Along The Watchtower
There must be some way out of here,” said the joker to the thief
“There’s too much confusion, I can’t get no relief
Businessmen, they drink my wine, plowmen dig my earth
None of them along the line know what any of it is worth”
“No reason to get excited,” the thief, he kindly spoke
“There are many here among us who feel that life is but a joke
But you and I, we’ve been through that, and this is not our fate
So let us not talk falsely now, the hour is getting late”
All along the watchtower, princes kept the view
While all the women came and went, barefoot servants, too
Outside in the distance a wildcat did growl
Two riders were approaching, the wind began to howl
If we go deeper we find The mythological story of “G” from Freemasonry - Gilgamesh aka Nimrod who was the hunter & he was a rebel against God …
cheers
Only rivaled by their Khazar brethren back home ...
Nazi Zionist lizards pigs like to eat humans.
No wonder, it's basically the same folks.
Organs taken from „corpses” are useless (or maybe just in the case someone wants to eat them).
To get organs for transplantation they have to be cut out of the body of still living human. Then the proper title should look like: „ Israel's Killing War Victims From Gaza Hospitals, Harvesting Organs”.
Israel has previously denied harvesting organs from dead Palestinians without the consent of families, calling such accusations "antisemitic".
I do believe; it would be nonsense to harvest organs from the dead.
--
my impression also....as is the belief that they have knowledge to grow them complete..
-
.pillar to post repetitions, conspiciously disingenuous , dancing on the same divisive dunghill and complaining when bitten etc....and will likely be running with some similar hamster wheel insanity at this time next year..
-
[Link]
'
.
Researchers have successfully restored cell functions and blood flow in organs of animals after death, offering new hopes for the future.
They even invented a few years ago new category of (supposed) death: so-called „brain death” — especially to recognize still living human as the dead one, which allows „dismantling for spare parts” such poor fellow.
Whatever they actually have technology wise & are doing is far, far, far ahead of what the general public perceives or is shown. Been that way since at least WWll. At least 20 year fag minimum typically.
3 days Dead, 3 hours dead or freshly dead doesn’t make any difference when MIBC beast & it’s Frankenstein Zcience don’t care & no one is checking on them in reality. BioWeapons (Covid-19) already proved that.
As a previously OR nurse, who has witnessed and participated in organ harvest procurement, it was of importance, that the organs donated, where from living individual, that their body could no longer survive, regardless of medical interventions. It was given as a gift from the family, that with their sacrifice of a loved one, another could survive. And live a new life.
This is indeed disturbing, this is very black ideology, I will not comment further on this issue..
But may I point out in 2008 slaughter of Palestinians these same criminal acts were perpetrated agains Palestinian prisoners, as well as those murdered by American weapons by the IDF.
But let me say, I’m proud that the men of Gaza meet these filth in battle, heads held high defending with there lives there futures of there brothers and sisters, making the ultimate sacrifice while the Israeli appointed Abbas, traitor and American puppet appointed president for life, hides from his fate!
aye….. and let’s not forget the twenty thousand Houthi brave enough to stand with there Palestinian brothers against the American and Israeli sponsored genocide !
Compared, I think, to most people, I developed a very dim view (pessimistic) of the human race and its main proclivities and dramatic 'adventures'. As a young child, I don't believe most children felt the way I did. I don't think I was entirely normal. Sure I had fun and enjoyed kid stuff, but I just never quite shared in the total tale (yarn) and the subsequent complete worship of modern scientific ingenuity and technical ('highly advanced') living. Never to the point it was always being presented. I always had that problem...I felt different about techno-man, about science, about government (democracy, blah, blah) about nation-building, cities, factories, highways, about the whole bit.
I still have that problem. A kind of moral dilemma.
Am I justified?
Are we cool?
Or what?
Fucking duh.
ned,
out
( you're like the pig pen of the psyche...)
out
Pardon me, but I have to do this:
I remember when I was a little boy, I had a friend named Mark. We were both about 5. Mark had little brother, probably 4. Don't remember his name, maybe Andy. Yeah, Andy, I think....
We were sitting on the swings in my backyard. I told them both there was no Santa Claus. Mark's little brother (Andy) started crying. They left and went to their grandma's house next door.
I'm sure she consoled them.
But there was no Santa Claus!
Have a nice day.
ned,
OUT
I don't hate people.
I don't!
Take care,
ned
Orwell spills the beans again: All animals are equal. Some animals are more equal than other’s.
The same game plays itself out over & over again in different epoch’s/periods of twistory. It’s propagated by the same PTSB again & again throughout twistory.
There is a clear separation within. We are not all in the same boat. GAOTU have made sure of that.
Proverbs 6:13 - 19 lays it all out.
13 who winks maliciously with his eye, signals with his feet and motions with his fingers, 14 who plots evil with deceit in his heart— he always stirs up conflict. [Link]
He winketh with his eyes, he speaketh with his feet, He teacheth with his fingers; Frowardness is in his heart, he deviseth mischief continually; He soweth discord. Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly; Suddenly shall he be broken without remedy. These six things doth the LORD hate: Yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, And hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, Feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, And he that soweth discord among brethren.
We are most unfair to God; we do not allow Him to sin.
Nietzsche
"Belief in the truth commences with the doubting of all those "truths" we once believed."
Nietzsche
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.
Nietzsche
i believe in a superior being, and the revelence of your bible scripture is totally lost and wasted on me. My eyes are open, and base my opinion of what I see, ascertain by logic and reading history. I will never base my opinion of blind faith, as I believe all religions have equal rights, provided each faith or teachings accept the indivisible right to follow individuals belief structures.
nor do I accept Hocus Pocus! Or something supposedly said in the Anderson bible, co wrote and financed by the Zionist fraternity or the St James bible, by criteria dictated by a mere king!
Funny thing is in all my years, I have yet to see any Preacher/Priest//Deacon/Bishop use those verses from Proverbs 6:13-14 in any fire & brimstone sermons or didactic lessons 😜 Wonder why that is ? - lol 🤡💩
I don’t support the deception by the “Supreme Being” (GAOTU) deceiving & depriving innocent children or traumatizing their souls/spirit & they’re ability to flourish, melt/shed husks/hulls, dream & be helped to reach they’re potential & be nurtured with love, harmony, truth of knowldege. Nothing divine or Godly in that.
Spirituality is humanity living in peace and harmony with each other.
Here's a thought. I was brought up Catholic, and always told the bible story of Adam and Eve as truth. But there is also the parable that Jesus told, about the prodigal son, with the message that we can go home, back to Paradise, anytime we choose. The prodigal son was not kicked out, he left on his own. I take that to mean we were not kicked out of paradise, we chose to leave. That to me makes a huge difference. God does not decieve or deprive His children.
The inference to the “GAOTU” is different than your interpretation above. The “GAOTU” is a secret society fraternity & therin lies the perception deception. The Devil is in the details. Once you unravel the Gordian knot of deception it all becomes clearer.
The term Great Architect of the Universe (or Grand Architect of the Universe ) is used by a number of groups but figures prominently in Masonic teaching. Belief in the GAOTU is foundational in Freemasonry. But the Great Architect of the Universe is not the God of the Bible, and faith in one does not equate to faith in the other . [Link]
Proverbs 6: 13-14 & 15-19 tells us who it is.
‘
Proverbs 6: 13-14 That winketh with his eyes, that speaketh with his feet, That maketh signs with his fingers; In whose heart is perverseness, Who deviseth evil continually, Who soweth discord.
Proverbs 6: 16-19 "These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among…
I can point you where to look, only you can see it for yourself. I can explain it to you, only you can understand it for yourself.
Thanks for the link.
To answer why no preacher, teachers, have taught Prov.6?? Simple they are ruled by human masters and are predominantly 501C3's.
They preach within limits and to itching ears. They are walking dead mens bones.
THE SPECTACLE OF SECRECY [Link]
"Secrecy dominates this world, and foremost as the secret of domination."
Bravura 🦅🔥🌞🦋🐝🦉
“We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, “Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” I suppose we all thought that one way or another.
Vishnu & Shiva
Shiva, known as the destroyer does not worship anyone
In Hindu mythology, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, the holy trinity are known as the creator of the Universe — however, while Vishnu worships Shiva in all his incarnations, Shiva, known as the destroyer does not worship anyone. The reason behind this is :While, according to the Bhagwata Purana, Vishnu is more supreme than Shiva, however, according to the Shiva Purana, Vishnu and Brahma were created from Aadi Anant Jyotir Stambha of Shiva, hence making Shiva more powerful than the two. This could, thus, be the reason that Shiva does not worship anyone.Another reason could also be that Shiva is the only Supreme Paramatma as he is unborn (Ajanma), Akarta and Abhokta (Vairagi) as said in Geeta that God is Ajanma, Akarta and Abhokta.God is neerakar (shapeless and formless), Shiva Linga is the symbol of Shiva’s nirakar form only.And also Vishnu always advised other deities (Kartikeya, Indra, Parvati, etc.) to worship Shiva only if they have mistakenly committed sins.
video here: [Link]
Now I Am Become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds.’ The Story of Oppenheimer’s Infamous Quote [Link]
They even tell us again in the song track from the movie [Link]
In order to create you must first destroy. Out of the ashes rises the Phoenix only to be born again & again. Out of Chaos comes order.
If any of you want to know how the world actually works vs. how you perceive it to work then read more Nietzsche. He told the truth.
Perhaps more than Jung. And that would be an interesting discussuion.
Philosophically Nietzsche’s Ubermensch would be Nietzsche’s way of conferring God or Godliness.
Cheers 🤩🦅🔥🐝🦋🦅🌞
The basic flaw in Nietzsche’s arguments is that he tends to draw unnecessarily extreme conclusions from otherwise insightful observations and thoughts. It seems more than plausible to me that giving an absolute priority to our moral obligations to others might get in the way of an individual’s creative pursuits. It’s also important – probably more so than ever – to distinguish genuine moral judgment from moralization and moralizing, i.e. the use of moral values and concepts to harass and intimidate. Nietzsche has extraordinarily insightful things to say about the psychological nature and function of this kind of thing. But is it really necessary to eliminate morality completely in order to create the “immoral” space required for creative accomplishment – to attribute no intrinsic worth or dignity to individuals at all? Insisting on a minimal standard of respect and consideration – limiting the acceptable ways of manipulating others to offering them good reasons to do what you want them to do – doesn’t limit the scope of creative will to power to any significant extent. A liberal democracy devoted to basic rights and equality of opportunity should be compatible with a culture that recognized dramatic inequalities in ability between individuals and that placed greater value on creative achievement than on ordinary contributions to society. I don’t see why Nietzsche should require more than this.
Speaking of morality and a case in point, here's the tail end of a discussion that lays open the immorality of controlling others and the necessity of finding the savior within ourselves after rejecting 'formulaic living' & rising from one's own ashes if you will... [Link]
For example, there is always hierarchy and compartmentalization. The hierarchy is seen in the structure of the freemasons as the different degrees know more about the agenda and to move to the next level you must pass a "test";. Some say that 33rd degree is not the top. The compartmentalization is seen in most intelligence and military operations; you only know what is in your compartment, nothing of how it connects to a bigger picture. In society the compartmentalization is also operating; your career becomes your compartment, even in academics.
Then you have how secrecy is enforced. The NDA, non-disclosure agreement, is used everywhere including corporations. In the freemasons, if you revealed too much you could be murdered. In our current times, involvement in child sexual abuse and satanic ritual abuse, makes individuals controllable through sextortion as Whitney Webb details in her books One Nation Under Blackmail.
[Link]
Money printed out of the Aether from nothing as it’s all illusionary indeed.
Cheers 🌞
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The orthography is ok at first glance, but the text contains some serious grammar atrocities.
I think the "stealing from mass graves" is bogus - they execute Palestinians on the spot, and cut them up immediately.
In former years the Jews entered a house, killed and dissected the victim(s), sewed them back up, and then blew up the whole house, so as to cover up their deeds.
Does that sound familiar ?!?
Somatic/Pluriotent Stem Cell technology has progressed light years.
Regarding Deceased or Not:
Ethics of deceased organ donor recovery [Link]
Two Models of Deceased Organ and Tissue RecoveryCountries around the world use two general models of deceased organ and tissue recovery. One model assumes that society has a legitimate interest in deceased donor organs and tissues and may recover them without any form of permission or authorization from the individual or surrogate. In general, this model prioritizes the needs of the society over individual rights, and is referred to as “deceased organ and tissue recovery without explicit consent or authorization” in this white paper. The other model presumes that organs and tissues belong to the individual and cannot be appropriated without some kind of permission or authorization from that individual or surrogate. This is the current model in the US, which is referred to as “the donation model.”Deceased Organ and Tissue Recovery Without Explicit Consent or AuthorizationThe model of “deceased organ recovery without explicit consent or authorization” was first proposed in discussions in the US as early as 1968 by Dukeminier and Sanders and currently remains under debate17,18,19,20. This model has been ethically justified in some countries either because: (a) the interests of the society (referred to as the “common good”) take precedence over the interests of individual choice, or (b) the consent of the deceased person is “presumed”. These justifications are explained below.a) Ethical Justification: The Moral Priority of Society (or the “Common Good”)In general, proponents of this model believe that individual needs and rights are subordinated to the needs and interests of the broader society, the “common good21”. The state is authorized to recover organs and tissues from deceased persons without explicit consent or authorization to benefit the overall needs of society and to prevent additional deaths due to organ failure. A number of countries in Southern Europe, Scandinavia, and Asia have laws allowing for deceased organ and tissue recovery that generally stand in this tradition 22,23,24,25,26.In the US, while this model is not allowed for deceased organ and tissue recovery as explained below, the ethical justification is applied to other practices in public health. For example, medical examiner laws authorize the autopsy of deceased persons for unexplained deaths without requiring consent or permission by the deceased person’s family. The justification for this practice is that the health and safety of the public overrides the interests of a deceased individual.b) Ethical Justification: “Presumed Consent”A few countries, mainly in South America, including Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Uruguay, Panama, and Venezuela, as well as Wales in the United Kingdom have laws that explicitly refer to a “presumption of consent” and allow deceased organ and tissue recovery without explicit consent or authorization27,28,29,30,31. “Presumed consent” implies that the deceased person would consent if asked, placing the ethical justification for this model on respecting the rights of the individual while prioritizing public health32.Although recent scholarly work and the laws in some of these countries frequently use the terminology of “presumed consent” to represent this model of deceased organ recovery, several members of the Ethics Committee argue that this terminology is inaccurate33. Presuming consent rests on the moral premise that consent justifies an invasion of an individual to support the public’s health that would otherwise be a violation of a moral right of the individual not to be touched. The ethical justification for this model requires empirical evidence demonstrating that most citizens of the particular country would consent if they were asked and had the ability to do so.However, most countries with the presumed consent model have a significant minority of citizens who would not consent if asked34. The national rate of authorization for eligible donors in the United States is approximately 75%35,36. Therefore, justifying deceased organ and tissue recovery without explicit consent or authorization based on the “presumption of consent” appears to be flawed8. The only remaining ethical justification for this approach is that the interests of society take precedence over the choice by the individual or by the deceased individual’s family or representative, as discussed in the prior section on the moral priority of society.Presumed consent holds precedence in other clinical contexts in the US because some medical relationships rely on a presumption of informed consent. For, example, patients brought unconscious to an emergency room are treated without explicit consent by relying on the legal notion of presuming consent, acknowledging that virtually all individuals would consent to life saving treatment if they could be asked. The presumption is morally controversial because if the presumption is wrong, an important right of the patient is violated (the right not to be touched without consent). However, only in rare cases, patients brought to an emergency department would refuse treatment if only they could do so. This raises the question of how confident society must be in believing that the patient would consent if he or she could do so. Since a mistaken presumed consent involves violating an important right of the patient, the ethical claim is that we must be very confident that the great majority of patients would consent. This is not empirically demonstrated when considering consent rates to organ donation37,38. Hard and Soft Models of Deceased Organ and Tissue Recovery without Explicit Consent or Authorization: the Opt-Out Option Deceased organ and tissue recovery without explicit consent or authorization may or may not include an opt-out option. The “hard” approach excludes an opt-out option, whereas the “soft” approach allows an individual or individual’s surrogate, often the family, to explicitly prohibit the state from recovering the individual’s organs or tissues39,40. The majority of countries that have laws permitting deceased organ and tissue recovery without explicit consent or authorization allow the individual or surrogate to opt-out in practice, even if the law does not explicitly describe the “opt-out” option41,42,43.
Let’s not be naive anymore about ethics or morality in an immoral unfair world that exists. Evil - Live
Israhell would harvest living or dead organs if it can be used & benefit $$$.
This technology is needed to grow new organs, grow fake food and to grow fake humans which will be used not only to test new drugs on, but to see how far the concept of a real Golem can be taken.
Quote: "Remember the Tibetan Proverb of the silently growing forest. And as trees connect with each other, so do humans by their spirituality – not transhumans, but humans that we still are."
Quote: "Today, war by media is a key task of so-called mainstream journalism, reminiscent of that described by a Nuremberg prosecutor in 1945: ‘Before each major aggression, with some few exceptions based on expediency, they initiated a press campaign calculated to weaken their victims and to prepare the German people psychologically…"
Quote: "‘I believe in American exceptionalism with every fibre of my being,’ said Obama, who expanded a favourite presidential pastime, bombing, and death squads known as ‘special operations’ as no other president had done since the first Cold War."
Here is a Swedish man reporting what he is seeing first hand. [Link]
What does it mean?
Quote: "The city I moved to is no longer recognizable. Shootings have become commonplace. Criminal networks operate in the background. To curb crime, surveillance cameras were recently installed outside the entrance to our apartment building.
Everything to “ensure our safety”. This happened just a couple of days after t he Swedish government declared at a press conference that it would crack down on crime through more surveillance in public spaces .[1] All to restore order out of the chaos that this same Swedish government had invited in 2015 when opening our borders to more refugees than our small nation was able to take care of."