OF THE
TIMES
Those who cannot remember history are condemned to repeat it.
Even if, it's too late. EVs are so from yesteryear ...
32 teams whose edge comes down to software and tuning rather than hardware. Then the winner team's software, which has been so much optimized to...
Socialism appeals to the Third World mind because the Third World mind doesn’t understand how systems function, it doesn’t understand much of...
Most are likely abandoned guard dogs. People can't afford to feed them any longer.
A very Third World preoccupation.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

But seriously, if rice is a food staple in your household, is it really a big deal which white rice you're using, whether it's long, medium or short grain? Are there statistically significant nutritional differences between the exports being limited and those that are not?
I have a preference for Basmati myself, while my wife is OCD about using short-grain sushi rice. But if you're just talking about nutrition, I think both of us would be chill if we didn't have a vast array of rice options. FFS, when I was growing up as recently as the 80s there were 2 types of rice. Uncle Ben's/Rice-a-roni style, or medium grain white rice (who knew which specific cultivar it was - not anyone in middle America!).