The study is a large observational study that looks at 887,193 children aged 5 to 11 years in North Carolina, of whom 273,157 (30.8%) received at least one dose of Pfizer vaccine between November 1st 2021 and June 3rd 2022. The study includes 193,346 SARS-CoV-2 infections reported between March 11th 2020 and June 3rd 2022.
The researchers used a form of statistical modelling with adjustments for confounding factors (such as underlying conditions) to calculate estimates of vaccine effectiveness over time and against the different Covid variants.
The findings are depicted in the charts below. In chart A, notice that the green and blue lines, representing children vaccinated in November and December respectively, go through zero into negative territory at a sharp gradient within five months of the first injection. It's unclear why the green line is not continued past April, as the researchers presumably had the data, but from what is shown it looks very much like the vaccine effectiveness will continue declining deep into negative territory.
In chart B, we see both the red and blue lines - which represent children who are vaccinated and have been previously infected and not previously infected respectively - again going through zero at a steep gradient within five months of vaccination. The fact that the vaccinated who have natural immunity from previous infection also see negative effectiveness is a surprise as one would not expect those with natural immunity to be more susceptible to infection than those without it.
Charts C and D suggest that it is the vaccine that is causing this worrying erasure of natural immunity. Chart D shows the effectiveness of natural immunity from previous infection among the vaccinated. Notice that the blue line, which is protection against the Delta variant among the vaccinated-and-previously-infected, hits zero at a steep gradient within seven months. Now look at the blue line in chart C, which is protection against Delta in the previously infected and unvaccinated. It, too, is waning, but much more slowly, and after eight months it is still very much in positive territory at over 50%. The same can be said for natural immunity against earlier variants (green line), which wanes slowly and remains positive after 16 months. Why is natural immunity remaining protective for the unvaccinated, whereas in the vaccinated their 'protection' goes negative even if they have natural immunity?
This is very disturbing because it suggests not only that the vaccines give negative 'protection' after a few months but also that they destroy the protection that should have been provided by natural immunity. The unvaccinated keep their protection from previous infection but the vaccinated end up with negative efficacy even if they've been previously infected. This means the vaccines appear to demolish a person's natural immunity and leave him or her more vulnerable to infection than he or she was before.
The new findings add to growing concerns among scientists about the effect of the Covid vaccines on the immune system. A recent study in mice found that mRNA vaccines like Pfizer's inhibit the immune system response to other pathogens. In that study (which is not yet peer-reviewed), the culprit appeared to be the lipid nano-particles (LNPs) which carry the mRNA in the vaccine:
"We found that pre-exposure to mRNA-LNPs or LNP alone led to long-term inhibition of the adaptive immune responses."Another pre-print study found that the Pfizer vaccine "induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses" including "inhibition of innate immune responses".
Oddly, the authors of the new study fail to draw attention to their alarming findings. Instead they conclude that the vaccine was "found to confer considerable immunity against Omicron infection" - even though the high protection only lasted weeks and was negative within months. They also conclude that "the rapid decline in protection against Omicron infection that was conferred by vaccination and previous infection provides support for booster vaccination" - as though what people really need is more of these injections.
But the study's findings speak for themselves, and they are highly concerning. It's increasingly clear that it was a mistake to rush mRNA vaccine technology to market, and that the vaccines need to be taken out of use and put back into the research phase until the full range of their effects and their safety profile are much better understood.
Reader Comments
And this is why I maintain a clear line between Zionists and Judaism. I can't help but feel sorry for Jews in Israel who may be more propagandized than even the West, because their Zionist leaders are the greediest of the elites.
Just today spoke with an old boss of mine, he and his wife are fully boosted... And sick with covid. He said they just could not seem to get better "for some reason". Ten days in and still sick as ever. I've got an idea about that, maybe the reason is that immune system destroying poison you got injected with!
Most people seem to have this inability to imagine that their governments or the higher ups of society could be complicit in such a horrible giant scheme as reducing the world's population with vaccines. I think the implications of acknowledging the possibility of something like that are just so massive and frightening that they ingore the evidence.
10% overnight bank interest in Sept 2019.
The Great Theft demanded sacrifices of the slaves and they delivered ... some day your masters may give you a raise in pay ...
Using the MMIBC - Military & Medical Industrial Banking Complex as a Neo-Machiavellian Juggernaut of control & death.
1. Halt Transmission 2. Provoke an immune response in the body.
The shot does neither. Therefore it is NOT a vaccine.
What is it then? I don't know, but I DO know that it is NOT a vaccine.
Probably more accurately labeled a KILL SHOT.
Gene therapy, nano-5g robots,new hiv. It's all speculation - albeit based on informed medical opinions. It could be all of the above - and probably is.
But one thing is certain - it doesn't provide an immune response against 'bugga-bugga' and it doesn't halt transmission. So it is therefore NOT a vaccine, and should not be referred to as such. Muddying the waters by using that term just adds to the division and confusion.
In this way, the globalist psychopaths hope to eliminate spiritual genes and the soul itself. In other words, mRNA is intended to genetically edit human DNA, and controlling what develops through AI implants.