© Getty
If passed, the government's online safety bill could see social networks fined 10% of their global turnover if they fail to remove harmful content.
The changes mean they will also have to proactively remove harmful content.
The bill also covers revenge porn, human trafficking, extremism and promoting suicide online.
It already stated that websites, such as Facebook and Twitter, that host user-generated content would have to swiftly remove illegal content once it was reported to them.
Now they will also have to put in place proactive measures to stop illegal activity.
The issue has become a talking point recently with the racist abuse of footballers, revenge porn and cyberflashing, and Covid disinformation being highlighted as key safety concerns for social media companies to address.
Comment: There we go.
Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries urged online platforms to start making the changes now before the bill comes into force.
Comment: The very Nadine Dorries who, clearly being an expert on online safety, just the other day declared that "we've had 10 years of the internet":
Speaking to BBC Breakfast, she said: "They can start doing what they need to do to remove those harmful algorithms and to remove much of the damage that they do, particularly to young people and to society as a whole."
The minister added the move would "hold the feet to the fire" of social media companies that have "damaged lives" and hold them to account for the first time.
Judy Thomas, whose daughter Frankie took her own life aged 15 in September 2018, said her school tablet and computer had been used to access distressing material in the hours and months before her death.
She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Back in January, February, March [2018] she'd been accessing, at school, horrendous sites."
Ms Thomas called for mandatory age verification to protect children online and said all websites should be included in the scope of the bill, rather than just larger platforms.
"We need to ensure young people simply cannot access online harms, and that if companies do the wrong thing... that there is a real price to pay," she said.
Ms Thomas added these penalties must not just be financial, as many businesses could "absorb that easily", but the heads of these firms must also be "held to account".
The big technology companies say they welcome the "clarity" that the online safety bill brings and that they recognise the need for regulation.
They have, in many cases, not waited for governments to step in and they have invested in tech such as machine learning in order to identify harmful content at scale.
However, while many say the bill does not go far enough, social media businesses point to free speech issues.
They say they want to ensure that new rules don't stifle people's access to information by causing companies to "over-moderate" by removing too much content, in order to comply with them.
Comment: The vast majority of social media companies have been seemingly more than willing to do the bidding of governments in censoring content.
The vast scope of the online safety bill means it will always have its critics.
But experts underline that its introduction will be nothing short of a revolution in how the online world is policed, and mean it will be a very different place for the next generation.
Comment: A rather ominous statement.
Asked about age verification, Ms Dorries said the government was looking at the idea, but said there was a "downside" to requiring all children to verify their age to access the internet.
"And young people go on to the internet to go shopping, you know, on clothes. Do we need to ensure that they verify their age when they're doing that?", she added.
The government confirmed offences to have been added to the list of priority offences, which must be removed by platforms under the changes, include:
- Revenge porn
- Hate crimes
- Fraud
- The sale of illegal drugs or weapons
- The promotion or facilitation of suicide
- People smuggling
- Sexual exploitation
Comment: Notably these are crimes that are already punishable under the current laws.
Previously, companies were only forced to take down these posts after they were reported - but will now be required to be proactive in preventing people from seeing them in the first place.
The government said naming these offences also enabled Ofcom - the proposed regulator - to take faster action.
Comment: The same compromised Ofcom that blocked a Chinese news broadcaster as part of the West's hybrid war against China.
The changes come after three separate parliamentary committee reports warned the bill required strengthening and more clarity for tech firms.
Comment: 'More clarity' likely means that the wording was so vague that it could easily abused by the authorities.
New criminal offences
In addition, three new criminal offences have been added to the bill.
The first is sending "genuinely threatening communications" such as a threat to rape, kill or cause financial harm, or coercive and controlling behaviour and online stalking.
Comment: Again, the police already pursue activity such as that noted above; the police have actually come under criticism for devoting too much of their resources for hunting down content that was merely 'offensive'.
Sending "harmful communications", such as a domestic abuser sending an ex-partner a photograph of their front door to frighten them, is the second. However, offensive content with no intent to cause serious distress would not be illegal.
The final new offence is "knowingly false communications", which would cover messages deliberately sent to inflict harm", such as a hoax bomb threat.
The government said the bill would not prohibit "misinformation", such as a social media post promoting a fake coronavirus cure, as long as those spreading it were unaware what they were saying was false.
Comment: As has been the case with other recent bills governments have tried to ram through, hidden amongst reasonable legislation are other much more worrying proposals that are essentially designed to further the governments totalitarian agenda: UK's "draconian" protest bill defeated at House of Lords - for now
As an aside, let's once again meet Secretary of State for Digital, Media and Culture Nadine Dorries, who in this recent interview provides a clear example of the kind of person currently in a position of power in the UK: