disabled abortion

Mrs Carter says she will appeal the decision
Heidi Carter has failed to overturn the current abortion law which allows parents to terminate pregnancies where there is severe foetal abnormality at any time up until birth.

Heidi Carter wanted to end abortions on babies with disabilities after 24 weeks.

A 26-year-old woman with Down's syndrome has failed to overturn the UK's abortion laws, with the High Court ruling that unborn babies with disabilities can be aborted after 24 weeks.

Heidi Carter had challenged the current abortion law that allows parents to terminate pregnancies where there is a severe foetal abnormality at any time up until birth.

Speaking to Sky News before the ruling, Mrs Carter said if she lost she would appeal the decision and continue to demand an end to "downright discriminatory" abortion laws.

Mrs Carter, who got married last year, said: "I don't like to have to justify my existence, it makes me feel like I'm not as valuable as anyone else. It makes me feel like I shouldn't be here."

Abortions can take place in the first 24 weeks of pregnancy in England, Scotland and Wales. They must be approved by two doctors, who agree that having the baby would pose a greater risk to the physical or mental health of the woman than a termination.

After 24 weeks a woman can have an abortion if she is at risk of grave physical and mental injury, or if the foetus has a disability, including Down's syndrome.

At the outset of the judgment, Lord Justice Singh and Mrs Justice Lieven said: "The issues which have given rise to this claim are highly sensitive and sometimes controversial.

"They generate strong feelings, on all sides of the debate, including sincere differences of view about ethical and religious matters.

"This court cannot enter into those controversies; it must decide the case only in accordance with the law."

Comment: For an idea of what kind of law this High Court endorses, they also overturned a ban that protected psycholigically disordered children from accessing drugs advocated by the transgender industry.

Ms Carter said she was left "really upset" by the judgment but added: "I will keep on fighting."

Speaking alongside her husband James Carter, she said: "I'm really upset not to win, but the fight is not over.

"The judges might not think it discriminates against me, the government might not think it discriminates against me, but I'm telling you that I do feel discriminated against and the verdict doesn't change how I and thousands in the Down's syndrome community feel.

"We face discrimination every day in schools, in the workplace and in society. Thanks to the verdict, the judges have upheld discrimination in the womb too.

"This is a very sad day but I will keep on fighting."

The joint legal action was also brought by Maire Lea-Wilson, the mother of a baby with Down's syndrome.

disabled abortion

Máire Lea-Wilson says she was encouraged in the hospital to abort her son Aidan
Mrs Lea-Wilson said: "I am a mother, and I love and value my two boys equally.

"Today's High Court judgment effectively says that my two sons are not viewed as equals in the eyes of the law and I am incredibly sad and disappointed that the court has chosen not to recognise the value and worth of people with Down's syndrome, like my son Aidan.

"People with Down's syndrome face discrimination in all aspects of life, with the COVID pandemic really shining a light on the dangerous and deadly consequences this can have.

Comment: Indeed, beginning with the first lockdown, and for at least year from then, medical professionals tried to get the most vulnerable in society to sign Do Not Resuccitate waivers, and this was despite the apparent order to desist from head office: 'Avoidable deaths': Do Not Resuscitate orders issued AGAIN - People with learning disabilities targeted during second lockdown

"This ruling condones discrimination, by cementing the belief in society that their lives are not as valuable as the lives of people without disabilities."

However, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) said women must have the right to "make difficult decisions in heart-breaking situations".

Chief executive of BPAS, Clare Murphy, said a change in the law would "force women to continue pregnancies with multiple anomalies to term and give birth where the chances of survival are unclear or unknown".

She said the distinction between a fatal and non-fatal foetal abnormality is "not a clear white line" and women should be able to make difficult decisions in the "context of significant medical complexities".

Comment: Except that with medical advances issues like downs syndrome can increasingly be differentiated from other ailments.

Mrs Murphy said the current law gives women time to understand the implications of a diagnosis, and not feel rushed into a decision.

She said: "Conditions which are diagnosed later in pregnancy can be incredibly complex and very difficult for women and their partners. Women are the ones who are best placed in these circumstances to work out what is right for them in the context of their own lives."

She said a women's right to terminate a pregnancy "must be seen as separate" to a society that promotes equal rights for people with disabilities.