High Strangeness
The videos of the Unidentified Flying Objects were taken by U.S. air force flight crews or by naval surveillance and subsequently "leaked" to the public. The question is: were the "leaks" authorized by Pentagon spooks to stoke the public imagination of visitors from space? The Pentagon doesn't actually say what it believes the UFOs are, only that the videos are "authentic".
A Senate intelligence committee is to receive a report from the Department of Defense's Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Task Force next month. That has also raised public interest in the possibility of alien life breaching our skies equipped with physics-defying technology far superior to existing supersonic jets and surveillance systems.
Several other questions come to mind that beg skepticism. Why does the phenomenon of UFOs or UAP only seem to be associated with the American military? This goes back decades to the speculation during the 1950s about aliens crashing at Roswell in New Mexico. Why is it that only the American military seems privy to such strange encounters? Why not the Russian or Chinese military which would have comparable detection technology to the Americans but they don't seem to have made any public disclosures on alien encounters? Such a discrepancy is implausible unless we believe that life-forms from lightyears away have a fixation solely on the United States. That's intergalactic American "exceptionalism" for you!
Also, the alleged sightings of UFOs invariably are associated with U.S. military training grounds or high-security areas.
Moreover, the released videos that have spurred renewed public interest in UFOs are always suspiciously of poor quality, grainy and low resolution. Several researchers, such as Mick West, have cogently debunked the videos as optical illusions. That's not to say that the U.S. air force or naval personnel were fabricating the images. They may genuinely believe that they were witnessing something extraordinary. But as rational optics experts have pointed out there are mundane explanations for seeming unusual aerial observations, such as drones or balloons drifting at high speed in differential wind conditions, or by the crew mistaking a far-off aircraft dipping over the horizon for an object they believe to be much closer.
The military people who take the videos in good - albeit misplaced - faith about what they are witnessing are not the same as the military or intelligence people who see an opportunity with the videos to exploit the public in a psychological operation.
Fomenting public anxieties, or even just curiosity, about aliens and super-technology is an expedient way to exert control over the population. At a time when governing authorities are being questioned by a distrustful public and when military-intelligence establishments are viewed as having lost a sense of purpose, what better way to realign public respect by getting them to fret over alien marauders from whom they need protection?
There is here a close analogy to the way foreign nations are portrayed as adversaries and enemies in order to marshal public support or least deference to the governing establishment and its military. We see this ploy played over and over again with regard to the U.S. and Western demonization of Russia and China as somehow conveying a malign intent towards Western societies. In other words, it's a case of Cold War and UFOs from the same ideological launchpad, so to speak, in order to distract public attention from internal problems.
However, more worrying still is that there is a dangerous reinforcing crossover of the two propaganda realms. The fueling of UFO speculation is feeding directly into speculation that U.S. airspace is being invaded by high-tech weapons developed by Russia or China.
U.S. lawmakers are demanding answers from the Pentagon about whether the aerial "encounters" are advanced weaponry from foreign enemies who are surveilling the American homeland at will. Some U.S. air force aviators have recently expressed to the media a feeling of helplessness in the face of seeming superior technology.
At a time of heightened animosity towards Russia and China and febrile talk among Pentagon chiefs about the possibility of all-out war, it is not difficult to imagine, indeed it is disturbingly easy to imagine, how optical illusions about alien phenomena could trigger false alarms attributed to Russian or Chinese military incursions.
The stoking of UFO controversy appears to be a classic psyops perpetrated by U.S. military intelligence for the objective of population control. Its aim is to corral the citizenry under the authority of the state and for them to accept the protector function of "our" military. The big trouble is that the psyops with aliens are, in turn, risking the exacerbation of fears and tensions with Russia and China.
With all the Pentagon-assisted chatter, it is more likely that an F-18 squadron could mistake an errant weather balloon on the horizon for an alien spacecraft. And amid our new Cold War tensions, it is but a small conceptual step to further imagine that the UFO is not from outer space but rather is a Russian or Chinese hypersonic cruise missile heading towards the U.S. mainland.
Reader Comments
Woodsman I hear ya about Thunderf00t. I believe he is a proponent of the narrative, yes?No. -Not if you mean the UAP narrative. He's all about sun flares and infra red returns of ducks and passenger airliners.
I'd have to pay several more hours of attention to him to figure out exactly what narratives he lines up with, but from the scattered bits of time I have spent...
He's obsessively anti-everything related to Elon Musk, to the point where it seems likely that he's acting out some kind of failed-child-genius trauma programming he picked up in school; he exhibits epic levels of competitive bitterness toward the successful -child-genius in the room.
-Which isn't to say that Elon is above criticism, but in Thunderfoot's case, everything he does seems subservient to those low-level threatened ego impulses.
I grew up with guys like him, so several of his cognitive tricks and patterns were immediately apparent.
-Which doesn't mean he isn't very clever or that his analysis is necessarily always wrong (and skewed and tortured into his preferred narrative), just that everything, for sure, passes through that radioactive filter before making it into his public presentations.
The Pentagon Is Behind the Fake Alien Agenda [Link]R.C.
Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. - Calvin and Hobbs (Bill Watterson)
Bonus clip; Free Energy and the Technology of the New World Order: [Link]
I'm a doubting Thomas: I too want to poke that alien and even then I want credence that it wasn't grown in a DARPA lab.
My only disagreement with Cunningham is that he thinks the psy-op is aimed at stoking fear of Russia and China. He's got it backwards: The aim, as Reagan suggested decades ago, is to UNIFY the superpowers to fight a common enemy. A fke one. Like COVID but bigger.
Whoever posts the correct answer gets a prize.
As re WVB, alien invasion etc.
Great!! I win 100K in USD $!!!! Great! I'm rich! What? Rupees? You're a cheap bastard, Larry [Link] .
Don't want to get me upset unless you're a dentist. I get upset: [Link]
Band of Penguins [Link]
I can see the star there . . . [Link]
Gibbons v. Hedgehog [Link]
Don't piss off your nip dealer. [Link]
You promise to give me the star? You're a sick bastard Larry. [Link]
I love this job: [Link]
RC
Psy op that or something this way comes and they can’t stop it.
Either way way they will not be forth coming with the truth.
Rest In Peace DC because you are dead to me and I don’t believe a damn thing any of you greasy turds say.





When I touch an alien I'll believe, even then I may give his rubber suit a pull.