the clintons
© Shannon Stapleton / Reuters
Hillary Clinton has been on the 'blame Russia for everything' bandwagon for a while now, alienating a nuclear power before she even makes it into office and giving us all the more reason to suspect that the world would not survive a Hillary Clinton presidency.

In July, when faced with leaks which implicated Clinton and the DNC in pushing Sanders out of the race, they opted for scapegoating Putin. The media was in a fury about 'experts' who had decided that Russia was responsible for the hack. So when Assange came out recently subtly hinting that Seth Rich, the DNC staffer attacked, shot and killed on the morning of July 8, was responsible for the leaks, we caught another glimpse into the psychopathic machine that is the Clinton team. But is such a scenario plausible?

Let's consider Hillary's history, which is plain to see since everywhere she goes she seems to leave a trail of scandals and corruption.

Recent revelations have included Clinton's role in the murder of President Gaddafi for his gold and oil, her complicity in the on-going destruction of Venezuelan democracy, and corrupt "Pay to Play" charges while at the State Department. On August 11th Julian Assange also came out saying that Wikileaks had 1,700 emails proving that Clinton was well aware in 2013 of the shipping and smuggling of weapons to al Qaeda and other related terrorist groups from Libya to Syria.

Now, here we have a number of fascinating items from the psychopathy checklist, from a list on the Sociopathic Style website:
  1. GLIB and SUPERFICIAL CHARM — The tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Psychopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A psychopath never gets tongue-tied. They have freed themselves from the social conventions about taking turns in talking, for example.
  2. GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH — A grossly inflated view of one's abilities and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart. Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings.
  3. PATHOLOGICAL LYING — Can be moderate or high; in moderate form, they will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form, they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous, manipulative, and dishonest.
  4. CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS — The use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one's victims.
  5. LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT — A lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, cold-hearted, and non-empathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one's victims.
  6. SHALLOW AFFECT — Emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.
  7. CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY — A lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless.
  8. PARASITIC LIFESTYLE — An intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities.
Remind you of anyone in particular?

The DNC emails themselves have been conveniently ignored in the media, which instead recycle Clinton's crazy rhetoric that 'Russia and Trump have released the emails in order to sabotage American democracy'. They never addressed the fact that the leaks revealed that the DNC was planning the end of Sanders's presidential run in April and that media outlets like Time magazine were complicit in making this palatable to the public. And, of course, what was never addressed was that all along Clinton's 'Democratic mafia' was busy stealing the election from Bernie:
In the first in the nation Iowa caucus, Bernie Sanders pulled off a surprising tie where he was expected to lose badly — Hillary won by just 0.2%. However, party officials never bothered to send vote counters to the most rural parts of the state, where Bernie was favored over Hillary. About 5% of Iowa caucus votes were never counted. At other caucus sites, Democratic officials loyal to Hillary purposefully undercounted Sanders caucusers. No doubt about it, Bernie should have won that one, as well as votes in other states that would have been affected by a big Sanders upset.
Would these thugs have the motive to kill a 'leak' in their party? Of course. Would they have the means? Judging from Clinton's long and disgusting criminal career, the answer is undoubtedly yes. But was Seth Rich the one responsible for the leaks? As an idealistic person working for the corrupt DNC he would have had the motive. Until we find more reliable information we just can't say. But Clinton's team's reaction, calling for the assassination of Assange, suggests he might be on target.

Not only can Clinton get away with all of this while on the presidential trail; not only can she still maintain her mask as a 'liberal progressive' while streams of information about her criminality flood the media; she can do all this while a pile of bodies continues to grow around her on her way there! Clearly some very evil people love this woman. It's no wonder then that governments worldwide have been warning their citizens from travelling to the US.