"We're going to be freeing these lands up, and getting ranchers back to ranching, getting the loggers back to logging, getting the miners back to mining where they could do it under the protection of the people and not be afraid of this tyranny that's been set upon them," Ammon Bundy, who appears to be the leader of the group, said in a Facebook video posted by Sarah Dee Spurlock on Saturday.
Bundy appears to be standing at the scene of the takeover, surrounded by several men in military-style uniforms with rifles and hand-held radios.
The rancher points out that Harney County used to be the richest in state, and is now the poorest. His radical proposal to solve the situation is to have armed "patriots" come and live in a de-facto self-rule zone independent of the federal authorities.
The second speaker in the video, identified as Blane Cooper, equates the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to bullies at school that used to beat one up and who eventually had to be put in their place.
"Until that line is drawn and say 'we've had enough of this tyranny, you are going to leave us alone' it will not change," the military-clad man says.
Militia group members occupying the Malheur Wildlife Refuge @KTVZ pic.twitter.com/M9TXEBJhP7
โ Wanda Moore (@WandaKTVZ) January 3, 2016
"It doesn't have to stop here. This could be a hope that spreads through the whole country, the whole United States. Everybody's looking for this hope because the government has beat us, and oppressed us, and took everything from us; they will not stop until we tell them no," he claims.
The militiamen told OregonLive there were about 150 of them, but a couple who delivered food to the refuge HQ estimated that there were just 15.
The Bundys and their armed supporters occupied the federal property after splitting from a peaceful Saturday morning protest in Burns, Oregon.
Some 300 people marched through the town to protest against the prosecution of two Harney County ranchers, Dwight Hammond Jr. and Steven Hammond, who are scheduled to report to prison on Monday.
Both ranchers were convicted on charges of setting fire to federal land. The case has attracted interest from local militia and intensified debate around the federal government's authority.
The Bundy family vows to occupy the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge HQ near Burns for years https://t.co/OfuNNh4uZX pic.twitter.com/GL0qTCB2xm
โ The Oregonian (@Oregonian) January 3, 2016
"Dwight Lincoln Hammond, Jr., 73, and his son, Steven Dwight Hammond, 46, both residents of Diamond, Oregon in Harney County, were sentenced to five years in prison by Chief US District Judge Ann Aiken for arsons they committed on federal lands," the US Attorney Office said.
The occupation resembles the Bundy Ranch standoff of 2014, when the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) attempted to enforce grazing laws. Bundy got the help of armed militia and triggered a standoff with federal authorities.
#Burns militiaman jon ritzheimer has posted a real weird video, seems to be saying goodbye to his family https://t.co/6kxLaC0Yue
โ John Sepulvado (@JohnLGC) January 3, 2016
The family said heavily-armed federal agents had surrounded their ranch as "trespass cattle" were removed from the disputed land.
Since 1993, Cliven Bundy - the "last rancher in Clark County, Nevada" - has refused to pay fees to the federal government for the right to raise cattle on land that his family has ranched since the 1870s, according to the Washington Free Beacon.
The dispute began in 1998 when the BLM designated 186,909 acres of the Gold Butte area, where the ranch is located, as "critical" for the survival of the desert tortoise population. Bundy had lost his grazing permit in 1993, despite his family's long-time presence on the land.
According to the BLM, Bundy owes around $1 million in fees, while the family contends the sum is more like $300,000.
Hammonds case
The Pendleton, Oregon jury found the Hammonds guilty of the arsons in June 2012. Both were charged with igniting a series of fires on lands managed by the BLM.
Hammond Ranches has about 12,000 acres in the Diamond-Frenchglen area. Their livelihood is running cattle during the winter. Two years ago, the ranch used 26,420 acres of land belonging to the BLM for summer grazing.
Supporters of the Hammonds believe they were treated unconstitutionally because the two were convicted of arson under a provision of an expansive federal law punishing terrorism. They both served their prison terms for 2001 and 2006 fires, but were then told by appellate judges they had to go back to prison to serve more.
Ranchers use fire in eastern Oregon to burn invasive species. However, it is a dangerous practice, as several wildfires in the area have gotten out of hand, scorching hundreds of thousands of acres.
The controversial case demonstrates a problem with a 1996 law, which was introduced to punish domestic terrorists, according to Barry Bushue, the longtime president of the Oregon Farm Bureau.
"I find it incredible that the government would want to try these ranchers as terrorists," Bushue told The Pete Santilli Show. "Now is where the rubber meets the road. Right now is when the public should absolutely be incensed. And the public, I think, should be fearful."
Yeah, in a pig's ass.
These stupid greedy butt-clowns want MONEY. 'Freedom' to them means the unrestrained ability to EXPLOIT FOR PROFIT.
They are just like the scum at the very top, plundering anything they can get their hands on, ruining it long term, and then walking away when they've fucked it up nicely...and stuffed their pockets all the while. And they always leave the mess they created for others to clean up, then criticizing the 'government' for not having magically solved the very problems THEY caused by their greedy, short-sighted actions. (Sounds just like the banksters and fascist corporatists, eh?)
These idiots don't 'believe' in any type of management or controls. Again, 'freedom' to them means the unlimited ability to exploit for profit, just like Wall Street and the multi-national corporatists. These idiots are mini-fascists. They usurp public lands for private grazing, ignore reasonable stewardship measures, over-graze the shit out of one area, then move onto the next like insatiable locusts. (Are these guys all British in origin?) Hear it from their own greedy lips:
"We're going to be freeing these lands up, and getting ranchers back to ranching, getting the loggers back to logging, getting the miners back to mining where they could do it under the protection of the people and not be afraid of this tyranny that's been set upon them,"
Let's check the selfishness and stupidity scorecard on these greedy ass-wipes:
Clear-cutting forests, even alongside riparian habitats and other sensitive environmental areas? They're FOR IT!
Fracking everywhere, including over critical aquifers? They're FOR IT!
Strip mining for mineral extraction? They're FOR IT!
Pollution controls? They're AGAINST IT!
Regulations of public lands to avoid over-grazing degradation and soil erosion/depletion? They're AGAINST IT!
Selective timber harvest to insure forest health and long-term viability? They're AGAINST IT!
Protection of endangered species? They're AGAINST IT!
Okay, let's add it all up and see what the end result is:
Looks like INSATIABLE, UNSUSTAINABLE GREED WINS and reasonable environmental stewardship and sensible management rules LOSE!
Like I said, these greedy scum want one thing: MONEY. 'Freedom" is the freedom to exploit for profit without any interference.
Mini-fascists, every one of them, wanting to socialize the costs of their mindless exploitations and privatize the profits. They get theirs, and leave everyone else to hold the bag and pick up the pieces and pay the costs.
Where have we seen THAT before?