A tourist claims having photographed a UFO that disappeared shortly after.
This incident is the second of its nature that has taken place in Entre Rios during the same week, when a man also photographed a strange object while taking a picture of his teenage daughter.
This new photo was taken at noon on Friday on a sunny day, using a notebook computer with a built-in photo camera, and from the heart of Plaza 25 de Mayo in Concordia, the second most important location in the province.
This image, published by the local El Heraldo newspaper, shows a grayish object between both "tips" of the St. Anthony of Padua Cathedral, located in front of the main square of this community, in northeast Entre Rios. Likewise, another photo taken seconds later does not show the object. The photographer interprets this as evidence that the object was moving at high speed.
The synchronicity between both photos is reinforced by the clock that can be seen on one of the Cathedral's belfries. Both images show the time as 11:45 in the morning.
While a similar phenomenon had not been known in Concordia, the nearby
The other case [was the one] that occurred in Parana on October 21st of this year, when a man named Miguel Angel Osuna photographed his 15-year-old daughter in Parana's Parque Urquiza. When Osuna took the image file to a photo shop to have it enlarged, the shop's employee noticed the presence of an elongated object that appeared to move swiftly.
For more information see here
(Translation (c) 2008 S. Corrales, IHU. Special thanks to Guillermo Gimenez, Planeta UFO)
Analysis of Photo:
After examining the photo and looking particularily at the pixels surrounding the alleged object it is my opinion that the object is fraudulent. The only question I really have is how could this object be photographed twice by two different photographers on different days, but at the same time - at the same place.
A rectangular pixel distortion pattern surrounds all objects on this photo:
[Link]
Go to above link and press play. You will get a zoomed in version of the sott article image.
Examine the rectangular blockiness around the "UFO" [ Sott article's zoom-in also shows it] then look at the same blockiness on other objects: pole, the cross, tree leaves. They seem similar .. first.
Look however at the border or edge lines of the blocky rectangles and you discover that due to the phenomenon of 'normal digital camera picture distortion' all natural objects have a RANDOM pixel graininess at the edge of their borders. The alleged UFO's borders are however perfectly clean, meaning the little UFO was probably placed into the photo, or is a bird, just someone smudged it with a blur brush.
Also UFO-s tend to be shiny. The sun doesn't shine on this one. Even a passing metallic fighter jet should be a whitish blur..
Photo feels awkward.