© NPR
Randen Patterson left a research career in physiology at U.C. Davis when funding got too tight. He now owns a grocery store in Guinda, Calif.
Ian Glomski thought he was going to make a difference in the fight to protect people from deadly anthrax germs. He had done everything right - attended one top university, landed an assistant professorship at another.
But Glomski ran head-on into an unpleasant reality: These days, the scramble for money to conduct research has become stultifying.
So, he's
giving up on science.
And he's not alone. Federal funding for biomedical research has declined by more than 20 percent in the past decade. There are far more scientists competing for grants than there is money to support them.
That crunch is forcing some people out of science altogether, either because they can't get research funding at all or, in Glomski's case, because the rat race has simply become too unpleasant.
"My lab was well-funded until, basically, the moment I decided I wasn't going to work there anymore," he says during an interview on the porch swing of his home in Charlottesville, Va. "And I probably could have scraped through there for the rest of my career, as I had been doing, but I would have had regrets."
Glomski's problem was that he could only get funding to do very
predictable, unexciting research. When money gets tight, often only the most risk-averse ideas get funded, he and others say.
Comment: If this recruitment effort does anything to improve the abysmal level of 'care' that our veterans have been receiving, then it will be worthwhile. However, that is questionable. The government seems to be good at throwing money around, while generally achieving little to improve the lives of those who have given all in support of the US psychopathic wars of terror.