One of the mysteries of language is whether, as Noam Chomsky and many others claim, language is a "module" residing in our brain, or not. This video summarizes the theory behind it, the conditions that would need to be fulfilled for the theory to be valid, and the problems we encounter with the latter. Is Language a module? Maybe! But probably not in the way that is presented.
References:
- (book) Vyvyan Evans, "The Language Myth", Cambridge University Press (2014)
- (paper) Mark D. Hauser, Charles Yang, Robert C. Berwick, Ian Tattersall, Michael J. Ryan, Jeffrey Watumull, Noam Chomsky and Richard C. Lewontin, "The Mystery of language evolution", Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, Article 401, (7 May 2014).
General comments on language that would question a module:
The romance languages, French, Italian, Spanish, are emotional languages.
The Chinese and Asian languages are symbolic and image related.
The ancient Egyptian was a combination of symbols and phonetics.
Aramaic and Hebrew have no vowels written.
I know nothing about Hindi or Sanskrit or Arabic or Farsi.
In my view, this indicates that thinking and conversing involves different parts of the brain for different languages.