Someone - we do not know who it was - decided that a major part of the research of a distinguished scientist should be suppressed - the public should not be told about it, that it is better to tell a lie than to tell an inconvenient truth.
Science in Secret?
A friend of mine, a distinguished French scientist, who is interested in many "esoteric" areas, tells me that one should keep these interests to oneself, otherwise one will be punished; covert actions of others will destroy your scientific career; and that is what he does - he will discuss certain things in private, but will never dare to say them in public. What kind of science forces scientists to work in secret, from fear? What kind of society gives birth to that kind of science?
William Crookes
While reading the remarkable autobiography of Alfred Wallace, Darwin's colleague, the co-discoverer - if not the original discoverer of the mechanisms of evolution, I found the following interesting paragraph:
During the years 1870-80 I had many opportunities of witnessing interesting phenomena in the houses of various friends, some of which I have not made public. Early in 1874 I was invited by John Morley, then editor of the Fortnightly Review, to write an article on "Spiritualism" for that periodical. Much public interest had been excited by the publication of the Report of the Committee of the Dialectical Society, and especially by Mr. Crookes's experiments with Mr. Home, and the refusal of the Royal Society to see these experiments repeated. (Italics, mine.)Who is Mr. Crookes? And what were these experiments that the Royal Society did not even want to witness? Remember: curiosity is a condition "sine qua non" of a true scientist! The Royal Society was not curious? Why? Perhaps the experiments of Mr. Crookes were not worthy of the attention of the learned society, because they did not suggest anything new?
From Encyclopedia Britannica we learn, additionally, that William Crookes was knighted in 1897. Searching the net we can find, in particular, an impressive list of awards:
Past President, Chemical Society, Brit. Assoc., Inst. Elect. Eng., Soc. Chem. Industry; Hon. Member, Roy. Phil. Soc. Glasgow, Roy. Soc. NSW, Pharm. Soc., Chem. Metall. and Mining Soc. of South Africa, Amer. Chem. Soc., Amer. Philos. Soc., Roy. Soc. Sci. Upsala, Deutsch. Chem. Gesell. Berlin, Psychol. Soc. Paris, Antonio Alzate Sci. Soc. Mexico, Sci. Soc. Bucharest, Reg. Accad. Zelanti; Foreign Mem. Accad. Lincei, Rome; Corresp. Inst. de France (Acad. Sci.), Corresp. Mem. Bataafsch Genoots., Rotterdam, Soc. Encouragement pour l'Indust. Paris; For. Assoc. National Acad. Sciences, Washington; Foreign Mem., Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. International Exhibition, 1862, medal; Acadèmie des Sciences, 1880, gold medal and prize of 3000 frs; Electrical Exhibitions, Paris, 1881, medal; Society of Arts, 1885, Fergusson Gold Medal; Exposition Universelle, Paris, 1889, medal; Society of Arts, 1899, Albert Gold Medal; Franklin Institute, Philadelphia, 1912, Elliott Cresson Gold Medal; Soc. Chem. Industry, 1912, gold medal. Royal medallist, Davy medallist, Copley medallist, and three times Bakerian Lecturer of the Royal Society.I feel that I need to explain my reasons for including this long list of Crookes' awards here. Do awards count? Do titles count? Facts are the only things that count - one may argue. Well, awards are also facts, and, most of the time, awards are given in recognition of someone's skills and achievements.
Coming next: You Shall Know Them by Their Fruits
P.S.1. 01-04-23 A friend, physicist, sent me this morning a link to this video by Rupert Sheldrake:
And there, in particular:
00:09:53
But I want to spend a few moments on the constants of nature too. Because these are, again, assumed to be constant. Things like the gravitational constant of the speed of light are called the fundamental constants. Are they really constant? Well, when I got interested in this question, I tried to find out. They're given in physics handbooks. Handbooks of physics list the existing fundamental constants, tell you their value. But I wanted to see if they'd changed, so I got the old volumes of physical handbooks. I went to the patent office library here in London - they're the only place I could find that kept the old volumes. Normally people throw them away when the new values (volumes) come out, they throw away the old ones.P.S.2. April 1, 2023 17:22 Quantum Future is getting closer:
When I did this I found that the speed of light dropped between nineteen twenty-eight and nineteen fourty-five by about twenty kilometers per second. It's a huge drop because they're given with errors of any fractions of a second/decimal points of error. And yet, all over the world, it dropped, and they were all getting very similar values to each other with tiny errors. Then in nineteen fourty-eight, it went up again. And then people started getting very similar values again. I was very intrigued by this and I couldn't make sense of it, so I went to see the head of metrology at the National Physical Laboratory in Eddington.
Metrology is the science in which people measure constants. And I asked him about this, I said "what do you make of this drop in the speed of light between nineteen twenty-eight and nineteen fourty-five?" And he said "oh dear", he said "you've uncovered the most embarrassing episode in the history of our science."
So I said "well, could the speed of light have actually dropped? And that would have amazing implications if so." He said "no, no, of course it couldn't have actually dropped. It's a constant!" "Oh, well then how do you explain the fact that everyone was finding it going much slower during that period? Is it because they were fudging their results to get what they thought other people should be getting and the whole thing was just produced in the minds of physicists?" "We don't like to use the word 'fudge'."I said "Well, so what do you prefer?" He said "well, we prefer to call it 'intellectual phase-locking'." So I said "well if it was going on then, how can you be so sure it's not going on today? And the present values produced are by intellectual phase-locking?" And he said "oh we know that's not the case."And I said "how do we know?" He said "well", he said "we've solved the problem." And I said "well how?"
And he said "well we fixed the speed of light by definition in nineteen seventy-two." So I said "but it might still change." He said "yes, but we'd never know it, because we've defined the metre in terms of the speed of light, so the units would change with it!" So he looked very pleased about that, they'd fixed that problem. But I said "well, then what about big G?" The gravitational constant, known in the trade as "big G", it was written with a capital G. Newton's universal gravitational constant. "That's varied by more than 1.3% in recent years. And it seems to vary from place to place and from time to time. "And he said "oh well, those are just errors. And unfortunately there are quite big errors with big G." So I said "well, what if it's really changing? I mean, perhaps it is really changing." And then I looked at how they do it, what happens is they measure it in different labs, they get different values on different days, and then they average them.
And then other labs around the world do the same, they come out usually with a rather different average. And then the international committee of metrology meets every ten years or so and average the ones from labs all around the world to come up with the value of big G. But what if G were actually fluctuating? What if it changed? There's already evidence actually that it changes throughout the day and throughout the year. What if the earth, as it moves through the galactic environment went through patches of dark matter or other environmental factors that could alter it? Maybe they all change together. What if these errors are going up together and down together? For more than ten years I've been trying to persuade metrologists to look at the raw data. In fact I'm now trying to persuade them to put it up online, on the internet. With the dates, and the actual measurements, and see if they're correlated. To see if they're all up at one time, all down at another. If so, they might be fluctuating together. And what would tell us something very, very interesting. But no-one has done this, they haven't done it because G is a constant. There's no point looking for changes.
Reader Comments
'BREAKING: FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court' BY THE EXPOSÉ ON APRIL 2, 2023 [Link]
Pseudoscience is meant to only be in the hands of government and not exposed. Science is what can be told to the public.
' We are' the Science.. so they said
Another example, Tesla. His name came up, twice, when we learned about the Tesla unit and high voltage transmission lines. Meanwhile half the stuff we learned up to that point in time, was because of his inventions. My real epiphany one day, was when our 80 yr old prof was teaching us some electronics theory. This was the 80's. We had 3 months to learn and know, what took him 30 years, as he lived it. I realized, we were being taught wrong. There are so many directions to go in the electrical field. They insisted in teaching us the basics of everything, plus everything learned in the last 100 yrs. Made no sense. There was so much more to learn. One dead field of study, I thought, was power transmission. Nothing in that field has really changed since Tesla's days. The electric generator/motor, is the same as it was back then, why? I know they are made with better materials, but that whole area was dead ended and until you go a read about Tesla, then you begin to understand why it was dead ended. Control. My whole experience in that system made me aware, just how much electricity is around us, unseen, untapped.
Here is an interesting short link on grounding. [Link] I wish RC was still around, we had a nice discussion on this once. There was/is a doctor MD who was also a homeopathic doctor who had a video on YT who talked about this whole process of grounding and charges. I wish I could remember his name. Basically, in a nutshell, what he said was, your body has a constant charge 5 volts, he found that if you are not functioning at 5 volts, then disease will follow. He figured this out while he was ill, his voltage was at 3.5 volts, so he worked to fix it. He bought a device to measure the body's voltage and worked to correct it. Grounding was one part, the health of your teeth, was another part very important part as it's instrumental in the root cause of disease in the body. It affects how the body maintains the charge. The man who invented root canals, was not for root canals. Yes, there was a need for them, but most will not be done properly. If the root canal, is done improperly (meaning a small bit was missed, miniscule) it could create further complications. Go look up this guy, he was not into the need to perform root canals, like we do today. Well, the MD, whose name I can't remember, stumbled across this, he had a couple of bad root canals, when they were finally removed/corrected, his charge corrected itself and he got better. Fascinating story. YT's algorithm has definitely change, as shortly after watching that lecture it pushed me a video on Viktor Schauberger. The water wizard smart like Tesla. He talks about water charges and drinking water properly charged is more important than you think. Optimal charge, is 5 volts. WOW
Electronics optimal charge was 5 volts, I know they've since shrunk that down making transistors more efficient in the 3 volt range, but 5 volts is still important. Our hearts also have a voltage, it's either 2.5 volts or 5 volts. I can't remember, a friend at the time told me this as he worked with a prof to build an electrical model of the heart based on it's dipole. Good luck finding this value online.
Anyone else, starting to see a pattern here? 2.5 and 5 volts is a fascinating rabbit hole.
The experts know a lot about this, and like above, it's never discussed in the public realm. It's too close to the truth.
R.C. was a lawyer, was he not?
But maybe one like Atticus Finch.
A real 'people person'.
A good man and great contributor to this site.
When I heard the news, last year, it was like: 'Damn.'
Damn.
ned
I miss his contributions and moderations.
I try to keep that in mind, when posting.
Always good to hear from you!
JTFT
The problem is that humanity has been armed with technological devices that allows one to question the unknown, should the Internet allow nowadays?
Those who aspire to Great things in Science are on a road to nowhere as academia has a handle on such matters.
*
"...It appears to me that our food supply - in particular animal products - is contaminated with similar structures we find in human blood. Dr. Jernigan did frequency testing on fruits and vegetables and did not get a positive signal. I encourage others to do the same research and replicate my findings. This would explain to me why I see these live blood structures in everyone. It does not matter if the products are organic or not..."
The "breakaway" kind of society. "They" are portrayed in arts as apart and above the rest of society and civilization; Like Elysium, and Alita: Battle Angel, etc. "We" are portrayed as beneath them; to be acquired, prepared, commissioned, value extracted, maintained via big pHarma, decommissioned(retired), and disposed of. It is societal manifestation of The Pyramid and All Seeing Eye you see on my pfp and on your dollar bill. The science that is taboo esoteric and occult is that of the extra-dimensional/quantum/etheric/Pranatic etc. "They" do not want "thou" to remember who and what "thou" are. Were that to occur en mass, then the structural integrity of The Pyramid Scheme will fail; society, culture, civilization will be regenerated and renewed. If "WE" choose to let the Ponzi scheme to continue, then what is next is "The Beast System" manifest. All Humanity and Creation will be serialized and catalogued into an ungodly AI system, down to the last cell, dna strand, molecule, and atom. There is no sitting on the fence at this point in history.
[Link]
[Link] The hymn to St John.
Another fascinating mention, double toroid or toroid's. This ties into the Hebrew letters (see Meru Foundation)
Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. - Spoken word = resonance.
The sun, wonder if it's original resonance (before the flood) was 528Hz, then after it shifted and hence shorter life spans.
We are in an awakening stage, so I wonder too, if the resonance freq has changed enlightening those with ears to hear? Could explain why all the frequency jamming going on now with 4G, 5G, transmission towers of other frequencies etc.
Another funny thought. Cellular Phones, shortened to Cell Phone, then Smart. Hmmmm.
Deu_29:4 Yet the LORD hath not given you an heart to perceive, and eyes to see, and ears to hear, unto this day.
Eze_12:2 Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house.
I've criticised you in the past for your Links, I will acknowledge on this occasion you have truly given others a window opportunity, WELL DONE.
If anyone uses Android devices I'd recommend a search for "Solfeggio frequencies healing" app in the Play Store. There's good free functionality and some extra paid features. Thanks JTF Truth for the 528Hz Hymn to St. John link, and the Meru foundation also looks interesting, thanks for mentioning it.
If you have not got direct knowledge of God (are in a state of divine, constant and unerring union with the Source of All and who of us is?) you should seek reliable testimony.
And in seeking reliable testimony, you should give reliable testimony.
And this should be your science.
And your religion.
And your art.
It should be very precious.
Because it is.
ned,
out
It can therefore be logically conclude that after the tenth time he dragged his colleges off to meet some lying scam artist with a scam that's obviously a scam they stopped caring about anything he had to say about spirituality.
But why do I even care, the other comments makes it clear that anti intellectualism have gained a big foot hold on SOTT.