© Antonin Herelle
So be warned. Dot-connecting schizopost incoming.
Now that the dust has settled from Corona, no one much wants to talk about it anymore. The normies who all went full Jonestown along with the Branch Covidians seem quietly embarrassed and reluctant to broach the subject, lest others be reminded of their rabid enthusiasm for masks, lockdowns, and forcing experimental gene therapies into children's arms. Likely some degree of growing disquiet over what they allowed into their cells plays a role there, too. The people who drove the normies mad in the first place especially don't want to dwell on the doom coof, lest they draw attention to their menticidal war crimes. Even the conspiracy theorists aren't terribly interested in talking about it, out of sheer exhaustion with the topic if nothing else. We've all been through hell and it's not something anyone wants to wade through for the millionth time. Bringing it up feels like picking at old scabs. Like Germans after WWII, everyone sort of recognizes that asking what their friends were doing a few years ago risks an awkward conversation that no one wants to have.
It's a weird kind of denial that's taken hold. One aspect of this denial has been getting prevalent on the weird side of the Internet - the growing number of people arguing that there was nothing real underlying the plandemic measures, that the whole thing was a holographic projection of the corporate media.
There are the no-virus people, of course, who hold to the position that illness is all down to one's 'terrain' or body ... a somewhat circular argument that one's health is a result of one's health. I'm being a bit facetious there - the role of toxins plays a key role in their model, and environmental toxicity is by far the dominant source of illness in our world. The no-virus people have yet to explain contagion, however. Toxins don't replicate. Until they explain why, for example, I tend to catch a cold after hanging around with someone who has a cold, I'm afraid they'll have a hard time convincing me that viruses are the twentieth century's phlogiston, no matter how much autistic detail they go into about Koch's postulates or electron microscopy or whatever.
The other form of denial is more limited. Viruses, this line of argument goes, may exist, but COVID-19 did not. It was, they say, literally just the flu, or the common cold. There was nothing novel about it. The PCR and rapid antigen tests were all fraudulent, the virus itself never existed, and the excess death spikes were all due to the treatments and public health strategies: lockdowns, ventilators, remdesivir, shutting the infected elderly up in crowded care homes, and so on.
It follows from this interpretation that the recent normalization of the lab leak hypothesis is just more scare-mongering. Renegade journalist James Delingpole gave what I think is a reasonably thorough and concise treatment of this position in his recent essay, So you think you had a novel, bio-engineered, lab-leaked virus?
Now, I like James, his podcast is consistently interesting and I listen to it quite often, but I think he's got the wrong of it, here.
A large part of his argument comes down to suggestibility. The idea is that with our sensoria being saturation-bombed with panic propaganda, every time someone would come down with the sniffles, they'd assume it was COVID. Supposedly novel symptoms, such as the loss of smell or 'long COVID' brainfog and the like, are psychosomatic. The positive tests are just down to the testing kits being so hypersensitive that they'll report COVID RNA more or less randomly.
Arguing against this requires a bit of subtlety on my part, because I agree with a lot of this. The PCR tests were absurdly over-sensitive, enabling the authorities to detect exactly as much COVID-19 as they wanted to detect. There's no question that the insane social interventions and counter-productive treatments contributed significantly to the death toll. And of course, people are extremely suggestible - the nocebo effect is a real thing.
However, I'm pretty sure the COVID-19 virus is real, and I'm pretty sure it came from a lab.
My own personal experience is quite enough to convince me of the former. I've had the virus twice, and each time it was like no cold or flu that I've ever had. The second time, last September, was the worst. I tested positive on the day I fell ill, and negative a few days later when the symptoms had cleared up. At the time I described it as like getting hit by a truck. That's hyperbole, but the point is it hurt.
© Alena Aenami
The first time I had COVID was at the beginning of January 2020, before anyone who didn't live in Wuhan - myself included - had even heard of Wuhan. I remember lying there on New Year's Eve, sick as a dog and pissed that I was missing the party, thinking to myself "Well this is a bad omen for 2020." Hah. At any rate, that was much too early for suggestibility to play a role. At the time I thought it was the strangest, and one of the most miserable, flus that I'd ever had. Only a few months later, as the symptom profile of the virus came into focus, did it become clear to me that I'd almost certainly had COVID.
As to its origin in a lab, enough virologists have remarked on the bizarre features of the furin cleavage site, the cytotoxic spike protein, and various aspects of the viral genome to make a reasonable case in my mind at least that they're not talking nonsense. Combine that with the presence of a biosafety lab in Wuhan, a long organizational paper trail of grant applications and funding allocations and peer-reviewed publications relating to gain of function research, a biowarfare facility in Fort Detrick, the emails revealing the attempt by that little goblin Fauci and his merry band of lickspittle lab trolls to squelch all talk of gain of function research or lab leaks, and years of censorship and mockery of the lab leak scenario by every official regime organ. That's a lot of smoke if there's no fire.
If the virus started its life as a computer model, the obvious question is what the purpose of the project ultimately was. The public justification for gain of function research is that by creating dangerous novel pathogens, scientists can study their effects and figure out defenses against them. This is a less than compelling argument (we wouldn't need defenses in the first place if no one made the damn things), which may be why such research was officially banned. In any case, that justification sounds like a minimally compelling cover story to me.
The most obvious motivation to develop artificial pathogens is military.
The strongest argument against COVID-19 being a recombinant weaponized virus is that it isn't exactly the apocalyptic engineered flu from Stephen King's The Stand, which wiped out 99% of the world's population. Airborne ebola it ain't. It wasn't another Black Death. It didn't even rise to the level of the Spanish Flu. What kind of lousy bioweapon has a piddling infection fatality rate of the order of 0.01%, with the only people who die in any notable numbers from it being senior citizens who have already exceeded the median life expectancy? That's the sort of bioweapon that only government accountants concerned about unfunded liabilities could love. Ahem.
If the rona was intended to murder vast swathes of the population, these black program genetic engineers are clearly terrible at their jobs.
Although that raises an obvious question.
Why should a bioweapon be designed to kill people?
Not all weapons are meant to be lethal. There are plenty of less-than-lethal armaments in the riot cop's repertoire: billy clubs, pepper spray, tasers, rubber bullets, plastic bullets, tear gas, beanbag rounds, and the microwave-broadcasting Active Denial System pain ray.
Killing isn't even necessarily the goal in military conflict. Unlike the old 7.62 round that blew a nice big hole in the target, the wimpy 5.56 NATO round isn't really intended to murder the enemy. It's meant to badly wound them. A dead soldier removes one dead soldier from the battlefield. A wounded soldier removes three, since two of his buddies have to drag him out, and afterwards he burdens the enemy's medical resources.
So, COVID.
© Anthony Catillaz
So what about the actual effects of COVID-19 on the human body?
One of the most remarked-upon, weird symptoms associated with COVID-19 is anosmia - the loss of smell. This isn't the usual side-effect of stuffed up nasal passages, which aren't generally a COVID symptom. Rather, it seems to be neurological.
Neurological symptoms aren't limited to anosmia, either. There can also be nasty headaches that don't respond to aspirin or ibuprofen (ask me how I know). Then there's the well-known brain fog, fatigue, and depression that comprise the nebulous 'long COVID'.
I know some people don't think long COVID is a real thing. I was once a skeptic, but am no longer so sure. After the last time I had it, I felt nebulously off for several weeks afterwards. It wasn't anything particularly specific. I wasn't forgetting my own name, or dropping things constantly, or tripping over my own shoes, or anything incredibly obvious like that. It was much more subtle than this. Where words and ideas would formerly flow like water, my thoughts felt sludgy and dull. The sparkle was gone. It was like I was trying to cut with a knife whose razor's edge had been blunted, trying to see through a lens that had been clouded with fog.
If it had just been me, I'd have thought nothing much of it. Like I said, it was a subtle effect ... I doubt anyone talking to me would even have noticed. But it wasn't only me. Millions of people around the world have been reporting the same lingering intellectual malaise following a bout of the rona.
That got me thinking.
What if this neurological muffling is the goal?
I realize this sounds like a wacky science fiction scenario, but I'm not so sure it is. We're living in an age of GMO crops, edible tumours a.k.a. lab-grown meat, AIs that are giving the Turing Test a run for its money, autonomous drones, brain-computer interfaces, jet packs, and self-driving cars. An experimental gene therapy concoction was just injected into the arms of billions of people. This is the 21st century, after all. Is a virus that makes people stupid beyond our capabilities?
The motivation for a state actor to develop such a weapon should be clear on the face of it. Per capita national GDP is a highly sensitive function of average national IQ. A few points is the difference between a wealthy, organized, clean, smoothly running society, and a poor, corrupt, dirty, dysfunctional shithole.
Say the US wanted to slow down the development of a rising rival. China, for example. A virus that made the population subtly dumber would be just the thing. Is it an accident that the first large-scale outbreak was in China? Most people point to the Wuhan biosafety lab as the likely origin point, and indeed they were researching coronaviruses there, or at least so I've heard. However, others have pointed out that just a few months before the outbreak was detected, Wuhan hosted the military games. The American soldiers who attended reportedly all got sick. Could they have been deliberately infected with something cooked up at the Fort Detrick lab? Along these lines, it may not be accidental that Iran was one of the first countries to experience an outbreak.
© Sebastian Smarowski
The mRNA shots don't actually seem to do very much to prevent either the spread or the symptoms of COVID; if anything, arguably, they just make them worse while destroying people's immunity. So it's a reasonable assumption that whoever released this did so without having a defense on hand ... at least not one they were prepared to share with the public.
I think that reduces the possibility that COVID-19 was an attack by the US military on China (and Iran), with the limited goal of hurting their rival's economy and thereby delaying its rise to global prominence. Without some sort of defense, releasing such a weapon is all downside risk (the likely diplomatic and moral blowback) with no upside benefit (if the whole world is similarly affected, including your own population, you've gained no strategic advantage).
So then, who?
I think we can make a reasonable guess as to who.
As to why, if there's one thing the wannabe demiurges of our larval prison planet love, it is control.
Domesticating humans is no easy task. To make their job easier, they attack us in many ways. They pollute our minds and souls with bad ideas - warped ideologies, misinterpreted religions, propaganda in news and entertainment media, emotional conditioning in the schools, and so on. They encourage the use of various drugs, both medical and recreational, that dull the mind, SSRIs and marijuana being especially popular of late. They adulterate the food supply with all sorts of poisons. They fluoridate the water. It's a long list.
The problem with all of these is that a clever human can avoid them. You can shut out the propaganda, not smoke the bud, not eat the toxic seed oils, filter the water.
But it's almost impossible to avoid a virus.
So let's say you intend to take over the planet through deception. You know, like a Great Reset, Agenda 2030 type of game plan. One of your main problems is that it's essentially certain that not everyone will fall for the guilt trips and saccharine promises with which you intend to prod and lure them into the technetronic control grid. You can only fool all of the people some of the time, and for this to work you need to fool essentially all of the people for quite some considerable amount of time.
Smart humans are more likely to clue in to what you're doing, and warn others. You can do what you can to censor the social media platforms, but that's a stopgap measure at best. Even the Soviets couldn't stop samizdat from circulating. You can socially engineer the population to adopt an authoritarian, intolerant epistemology, but this makes their minds brittle and the ones unaffected by that conditioning end up with a huge cognitive advantage compared to your unwitting minions.
But what if you can release something that makes everyone a little bit stupider?
© Stefan Koidl
You're just looking to dull their wits a tiny bit. Make them a little slower to catch on.
It doesn't need to be a huge effect. Shaving a few points off the IQ of the population might be barely noticeable at the individual level, but could reasonably be expected to have significant effects at the general population scale, just as it does with national GDP.
It doesn't even need to affect everyone at once, nor does it necessarily need to be permanent. Enstupidating several percent of the population for a month or two at a time as the epidemiological waves move through the herd will slow their minds down enough, on average, to keep the herd from catching on.
But then why all the hysteria about stopping the spread? Surely they'd have wanted the virus to spread, no?
Well of course they did. You didn't really think the lockdowns were about flattening curves, did you? You must have noticed that they also did everything in their power to prevent any sort of effective treatment or prophylactic being used - hydroxychloroquine, invermectin, vitamin D, all of it was 'debunked', restricted, even banned. Far from trying to prevent the spread, they seem to have done everything they could to prevent people from effectively defending themselves against it.
But wouldn't they be worried about catching the bedumbening viral load themselves?
Probably. It's certainly possible that they had an actual vaccine, which was made available only to the inner circle. On the other hand, it's possible they didn't, and that this was a risk they were willing to take. The masters of our world are not in the positions they are because they are towering geniuses. They have power because they have more money than God. With that sort of wealth, you don't need to be smart. Indeed many of them quite obviously aren't. It might be that they were willing to take the hit.
So, why release it in China? This is also obvious. Release it in a city with a large biosafety lab, and the natural assumption is that it came from that lab. Denounce this reasonable inference as a conspiracy theory, and the conspiracy theorists will latch onto it, as indeed they did. After a while, the artificial origin of the virus becomes harder to deny, so the media admits it was 'leaked' from a lab. Once again the normies are satisfied, and they can continue blaming China. Meanwhile, the conspiracy theorists will poke a little deeper, as they do, and start pointing the finger at the military games in Wuhan and the possible connection to Fort Detrick. Now the counter-narrative to the mainstream narrative is that it was the US what done it, as an attack on China ... which version of things the Chinese will be quite happy to amplify.
In other words, by releasing it in Wuhan, nested cover stories are created, which shield the identities of the actual perpetrators. Who, all the while, are busily working to fold the collapsing global economy into their CBDC-powered, algorithmically managed, renewably starved beast system.
Once again, I know this sounds outlandish. But also once again, we've got AIs passing the MCAT with flying colours now, so who's to say what 'outlandish' is in the Current Year?
I'm not saying that making people dumber is definitely what the purpose of COVID-19 was. I have no idea what it was designed to do; and, to be perfectly honest, I don't know for sure that the virus was definitely designed, or if so that it was definitely designed as a weapon. I'm just putting together the pieces in front of me. We've got a virus that looks like it was the product of a long-running, lavishly funded, secretive global research program. In terms of lethality that virus is a nothingburger. That virus regularly produces neurological symptoms, that no one recalls having experienced from a virus before, which feel a lot like getting stupider. All of this in the context of a globalist elite who repeatedly and at length tell us that they intend to impoverish and enslave us, who already work in multiple ways to degrade the intelligence of the human species, and who have been moving full speed ahead with their project ever since the virus was released.
© Joakim Ericsson
Reader Comments
Even FactCheck.org admits,
Recent legislation pays hospitals higher Medicare rates for COVID-19 patients and treatment, but there is no evidence of fraudulent reporting....Right now Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital, you’ll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000, three times as much.
Even Fauci has admitted the seasonal flu disappeared during that time period.
Seems to me the only evidence that there exists a novel coronavirus is because the government and its bought-and-paid-for researchers say it's so.
Sorta like the Moon Landing and Global Warming.
I guess it's like Mark Twain said, “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
[Link]
[Link]
Like all office meetings, it's never about what they are talking about.
The article above opens the dialogues more. Your link delves more on the non-existence side.
We all be should discussing it more here in the chats. Fruits is what I'm looking for, fruits.
I got sick on or about late Feb early March 2020. Fever, chills, dry cough. Lasted about 1 week. It also knocked my inner ear off. I felt off kilter until June. Next cold was in Jan 2021, 3 days, I was fine. Last August, caught a bug from a child, it started to go away, then it came back with a vengeance during the hurricane in Sept. I got antibiotics and problem solved. But my inner ear was off and has been, so in Jan I got ear drops, and my inner ear got better and as a side bonus, the tinnitus I've had the last several years as subsided, by half. My inner ear was so off I couldn't put socks on standing or shoes, without holding onto something else. Turning too quickly to see something, whoa. It was like being drunk without being drunk. I'm saying this because I've not heard anyone have similar experiences.
It does make me think, so viruses are specifically made.
Back to Covid. Last time I heard them mention the common cold, was at the beginning of this psyop. What a great cover to hide lots of lies. Like 911, the cause was never the goal. We keep talking about false flags, well I believe we were used as one and completely missed that fact. Remember old school science, "Cause and effect"? Cause it not necessarily the most important thing, it's the effect.
Just starting a list:
-years before covid, entertainment media put out the signal markers
-in the leadup to the lie, official NGO's started processes
-media again, just before the lie goes global, puts out some more markers, military games (most got sick), people got ill in Iran, China
-potential outbreak story goes out. The WHO takes center stage, no pun intended their. Is is a coincidence their acronym spells out the name of an anti-establishment UK bank? Were they really anti-establishment or just meant to look that way? But I digress.
-The WHO's planned systems start to kick off, the Davos' crew, know what to do next, since they ran a scenario weeks before the outbreak goes viral in the media, so they know what to do next.
-The stage is now set for the effects:
- first targets are the elderly, ALSO KNOWN AS the Wise Ones, in olden days
- loss of rights
- censorship
- coercion on a grand scale, and not one person charged
- compliance enforcement begins
- people are made to WFH
- people get comfortable WFH
- Vax comes out, just in time for Christmas (another satanic holiday, hosted by satan clause)
- then people start dying
- covid, which has been beaten to death by the media and governments, day in and day out, slowly ease back on the BS, because just as massive numbers of people start to die off after getting the shot or shots, good ol Russia saves the day for all, by creating a war as a distraction to lessen the covid propaganda while all the rats scurry away to their new highly paid jobs, for doing such a good covid job on us.
- now media circles back to lab leak and the fights back and forth, yes, no, no, yes. It's all part of the game and not the answer, but it certainly does waste our time.
- billionaires got richer
- more billionaires died more mysterious deaths in the last 3 years than ever before
- infrastructures in countries with no wars have been destroyed by mischief or weird coincidences that appear less likely to be the case
- banks made billions
- Pharma made billions more
- now the time has come for them to pull their money out of the markets, again at our expense and their next gained effect
Revelation, in the bible is very informative and at the same time vague on some details. It tells you who the bad guys are and where they come from. It just doesn't tell you that they were and are all in it together, behind the scenes.
As far as it being a bioweapon, perhaps the author should have spent a few words discussing how COVID mysteriously showed up in Tehran, Iran days after it was supposed to have started in Wuhan and killing four or more Iranian parliamentary figures.
Or the U.S. intelligence reports issued to the Whitehouse in early November of 2019 warning of a Chinese contagion - weeks if not months before the Chinese began to realize what was happening.
With respect to the dumbing-down of society, that will be the most difficult to prove because the 'before and after' pictures are sadly similar.
[Link]
This is probably the third or fourth time I've read the name of " Imperial College London modeller Neil Ferguson " associated with unrealistic (pretend) models of virus distribution through the population. He should be swinging with Fauci, Birx and the rest of them.
I found this interesting, from the beginning of the article.
It's a weird kind of denial that's taken hold. One aspect of this denial has been getting prevalent on the weird side of the Internet - the growing number of people arguing that there was nothing real underlying the plandemic measures, that the whole thing was a holographic projection of the corporate media.
Well maybe it does have some basis in reality for some people.
This youtube video from 2008[Link] Special Appearance via Holographic Technology by Bill Gates during WCIT 2008 Kuala Lumpur. He talked about Innovation in a Connected World : Trends & Opportunities.
[Link]
Also this interesting article from 2017 Pivotal, a startup with Bill Gates' support, lights up holographic beamforming using 4G & 5G technology
Pivotal Commware, a startup that recently received $17 million in funding, is taking its proprietary holographic beamforming (HBF) to the streets, with plans to dramatically expand the capacity of existing 4G networks while becoming indispensable to the 5G rollout.
Pivotal said that it’s working on multiple projects for fronthaul and backhaul opportunities, including prototypes for two Tier 1 carriers and work with several carriers in the U.S. and in Western Europe on both 4G and 5G. And from a roadmap perspective, it’s working on projects that include tactical battlefield communications and air-to-ground inflight communications.
And finally this from 2021 With backing from Bill Gates, Pivotal Commware raises $50M for 5G products
Gates has been investing in Pivotal since 2017, not long after it was spun out from Intellectual Ventures. It’s one of several Gates-backed ventures that make use of metamaterials, an exotic breed of electronics that can channel signals without moving parts. Pivotal calls its metamaterials-based technology “holographic beam forming.” The technology is used primarily to support ultra-wideband 5G communications.
[Link]
Embedded video from linked article. Note all the corporate logos. Reminds me of that tom Cruise movie I think it was called Minority Report, walking through the shopping mall and holographic images popping up.
[Link] So using this technology, it can be used to beam all over the planet, even rural areas. And talking about holographic technology, how about a faked alien invasion or a newer updated version of the Fatima prophecies?
[Link]
SOTT Focus:Compelling Evidence That SARS-CoV-2 Was Man-Made
The unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic left many unanswered, or unsatisfactorily answered, questions. Why were effective drugs banned while a hypothetical vaccine was promoted? Why the sudden...However those who’ve studied the subject have found that Chinese people have the highest average IQ, followed by white people, and below them, on average, black people.
I learned this fact from watching this UK based YouTube channel: [Link] The host of this channel has detailed the contortions of UK society as it attempts to ameliorate the fact that black people in the UK aren’t as smart on average as white people, all the while ignoring this fact and always laying the blame on institutional racism.
I have however wondered to myself what impact the fact that Chinese people are smarter on average than white Europeans and Americans, has on the current geopolitical struggle between the West and China. It may well be that someone else has been concerned enough to try to do something about it.
IQ is largely a pseudo-scientific swindle.
The idea that intelligence can be measured by IQ tests alone is a fallacy according to the largest single study into human cognition which found that it comprises of at least three distinct mental traits.
IQ tests have been used for decades to assess intelligence but they are fundamentally flawed because they do not take into account the complex nature of the human intellect and its different components, the study found.
[Link]
Second link: m.youtube.com/channel/UCREM9VRZnIJHTw-oqfwgNUQ
Correct. But you're speaking of individuals. Not collectives. Civilization was advanced by individuals, not collectives.
To say that 'white people' are more intelligent that 'black people' is no more - or no less - ambiguous than saying blue-eyed people are more intelligent than green-eyed people.
seems to be true is that Chinese people are more intelligent on average than white people
Ever think that the Chinese might have a better education system than the Americans?
There is alot to the racial question but feelings are easier to control than facts. This lends to the deception that whites should feel guilty for showing and helping their race overcome barriers creating technology that serves themselves in a beneign way, where as intellectual property can be awarded a malevolent trajectory, just saying..
Ive been called a Nazi, White Supremacist and Racist purely for showing people that Africans live the way they did because it reflects their genetic means, that is to say if we left Africans alone they would become less western and more African, same with the Chinese, they haven't got the same civilizational resume as whites historically, doesnt mean we have to hate on Chinese, but while it can be proven it is deamed racist to simply say it without the hostility or enmity society hooks onto it.
The core of racism is the notion that the individual is meaningless and that membership in the collective — the race — is the source of one's identity and value.
I'm assuming that you self identify as 'white.' So are you saying I should judge you by the collective you identify with — for which I have no respect — or should I judge you by your individual character and actions?
This is brilliant - not that I agree with all of it, as I too think, that there was no covid pandemic in terms that there was a new dangerous virus, blah,blah,blah - yeh I had it too, but very early on, it was completely obvious to me, that almost every death, was being classed as covid, even if you fell off a motorbike or had been assassinated by midazolum and morphine, to create space for more bodies, for when the jabs start...Read Mike Yeadon for more details. Some of what has been going on, I find personally distressing.
The artwork here is absolutely first class.
Thank You,
Tony
The first thing to note is the flu disappeared in 2020. Wow. ALL death was called COVID the invisible killer. That should make everyone think and ask questions.
The author frames the discussion on Covid, the virus, being the weapon. If 2020 is an indicator, then the virus was the flu. Then covid-the-virus was a psyop on the people of the world which enabled masks, lockdowns, closing churches, closing businesses, vaccine mandates, keeping people from coming together, and make Everyone afraid of Everyone and the invisible virus. Was it a conspiracy? All of the governments, media, twitter and the social media, "experts", WHO, FDA, CDC were in lockstep, and all other voices censored. Gee, that sounds like working together to me and for a common evil goal.
The initial phase of the psyop was videos showing people in China and Italy gasping-for-breath, like George Floyd interestingly, and dying. Everyone has gasped for breath on occasion, so it is a penetrating trauma to see a video of it.
The question, why China, Iran and Italy? One of the first interviews in 2020 that caught my attention was Dr. Chetty being interviewed by Fuellmich. He was a real medical doctor who examined symptoms and used his skills including HCQ or Ivermectin to treat the symptoms. What he noted was there were 3 or 4 phases where different races came to be examined who had different symptomology. This suggested to me that South Africa was being used to test the genetic targeting of bioweapons. In this view, then China, Iran and Italy would be testing grounds for the effectiveness not of the virus but the agents used in the vaxxes. It was not as effective as they planned (65 million according to the Event 201 exercise) though the vax effects accumulate over time, according to Clif High, because Vitamin D was a prophylactic against even the "flu" virus.
Does the vax bioweapon(s) have neurological effects that pacify or dumb-down the people? Based on the response that most family members of those who die "suddenly", they don't see the connection, so yes. Dumbing down in America at least has been ongoing for decades through education, technology, the air we breathe, the food we eat.
One of the words the author uses is "contagion" as in the movie. The "contagion" as a phrase is social engineering to promote fear of "catching" it. In the case of a bioweapon attack, we need to think differently. How do we spread death and destruction to as many people as possible under the cover of "contagion"?
In this case we have mRNA as a "vaccine" which was NEVER approved for any therapy, because of the questionable effect it could have on genetics. What is mRNA? It is messenger-RNA, which is a copy of DNA, that provides the schematic for building a protein. It generally is degraded shortly after its use. However, if modifications are done to mRNA it is not degraded. Therefore it can continue to produce the protein.
What does it mean? The patents cover the creation of mRNA. The mRNA of the vaxx is supposed to create the "spike protein" which we know is toxic, but we do not know what it is or whether there are multiple versions of it. From anecdotal evidence, we know unvaccinated people are being "infected" from the vaxxed. The result is we have a way of spreading the "contagion" that people believe is a virus.
I think by changing our own consciousness in a positive way, affects consciousness for everyone. According to David R Hawkins a Teacher like Buddha or Jesus affected millions or maybe hundreds of thousands at that time.
That's what the books were about, and included essays from many people who have had incredible experiences of being connected to the Source. A lot of similarities to A Course in Miracles.
Probably. It's certainly possible that they had an actual vaccine, which was made available only to the inner circle. On the other hand, it's possible they didn't, and that this was a risk they were willing to take."
They probably took the very antidotes they prevented others from getting, such as hydroxychloroquine and invermectin.