Federal judge Mark Pittman of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in an order issued Feb. 2, said the FDA must release redacted versions of the documents in question according to the following disclosure schedule:
- 10,000 pages apiece, due on or before March 1 and April 1, 2022.
- 80,000 pages apiece, to be produced on or before May 2, June 1 and July 1, 2022.
- 70,000 pages to be produced on or before Aug. 1, 2022.
- 55,000 pages per month, on or before the first business day of each month thereafter, until the release of the documents has been completed.
Last week's ruling is the most recent development in an ongoing court case that began with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in August 2021 by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT), a group of doctors and public health professionals.
PHMPT, a group of more than 30 medical and public health professionals and scientists from institutions such as Harvard, Yale, and UCLA, in September 2021 filed a lawsuit against the FDA after the agency denied its original FOIA request.
Comment: See also:
- FDA asks Federal Judge to grant it until the year 2076 to fully release Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine data
- FDA says it will fully release docs behind Pfizer vaccine approval by 2076
In that request, PHMPT asked the FDA to release "all data and information for the Pfizer vaccine," including safety and effectiveness data, adverse reaction reports, and a list of active and inactive ingredients.
The FDA argued it didn't have enough staff to process the redaction and release of hundreds of thousands of pages of documents, claiming it could process only 500 pages per month.
This would have meant the cache of documents would not be fully released for approximately 75 years.
In his Jan. 6 order, Pittmann rejected the FDA's claim and instead required the agency to release 12,000 pages of documents by Jan. 31 and an additional 55,000 pages per month thereafter.
Pfizer responded, to the Jan. 6 order by filing a memorandum with the court on Jan. 21, requesting to intervene in the case for the "limited purpose of ensuring that information exempt from disclosure under FOIA is adequately protected as FDA complies with this Court's order."
Pfizer claimed to support the disclosure of the documents, but asked to intervene in the case to ensure that information legally exempt from disclosure will not be "disclosed inappropriately."
Comment: What kind of information would be "legally exempt from disclosure"?
Surely, if the data demonstrated that the vaccine was safe and effective, Pfizer should have no problem with making ALL of the information publicly available. The original request to delay public release of the documents suggests that both the FDA and Pfizer have something to hide.
As reported by The Defender, this request, if granted, would have also meant further delay for the release of the next tranche of documents, until May 1.
Lawyers for PHMPT, in a brief submitted Jan. 25, asked Pittman to reject Pfizer's motion, prompting Pittman's Feb. 2 order.
The first batch of documents produced in Nov. 2021, which totaled a mere 500 pages, revealed there were more than 1,200 vaccine-related deaths within the first 90 days following the release of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.
Reader Comments
Suspected denial of AstraZeneca from Argentina [Link]
VACCINES and GRAPHENE - 2. NANOPARTICLES SPEAK ITALIAN.
Award-winning Studio of the famous Capua and the young Delogu.
Other Research with EU Money
We also have material to write at least 5 other articles on the potential of graphene in anti-Covid vaccines. The benefits are presumed, the contraindications absolutely unknown in relation to the toxicity of the material that could prove to be the Eternity of the third millennium tomorrow. But above all it is an element with electronic and photonic powers which therefore could be fundamental for the neurological control of a human being. It is not science fiction. We will soon reveal every detail.
[Link]
VACCINES and GRAPHENE - 3. MYSTERIOUS AND DANGEROUS NANOPARTICLES IN THE SERUM MRNA.
Pfizer: "Toxicology not thoroughly studied"
[Link]
FEBRUARY 10, 2022
Emergency physician, Dr. José Luis Gettor, warned the population about the damage caused by PCR test swabs. Just as other researchers have pointed out that the swabs of this test contain graphene oxide —a nanomaterial that causes magnetism in the area and crosses the blood-encephalic barrier—, Dr. Gettor points out that they also contain ethylene oxide. Ethylene oxide is toxic too and causes the burning felt by those who take this test.Details are below in the new video that Orwell City brings to its readers.
[Link]
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger on possible zombie pandemic
FEBRUARY 04, 2022
In an exclusive interview for El Mirador del Gallo radio station, Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger explained how a zombie pandemic scenario, just like any other pandemic scenario, could be created through graphene and the technology that goes into vaccines.As she mentioned in a previous interview for World CONUVIVE, the technology that's being injected into people is capable of receiving electromagnetic patterns and decoding them to cause any type of disease.More details in the new video that Orwell City brings to English for its followers.
[Link]
Comparison of microtechnology found by researchers from New Zealand and those taken by La Quinta Columna
FEBRUARY 02, 2022
Like La Quinta Columna and other researchers, a team of New Zealand scientists also found microtechnology in Pfizer vials.The similarity between what the New Zealanders and the Spanish scientists found is uncanny.Orwell City then brings to English the remarks made by La Quinta Columna on Chilean radio station El Mirador del Gallo.
[Link]