Puppet Masters
Recent revelations shedding light on the fact that America's premier science institute - the National Institutes of Health (NIH) - was less than forthcoming regarding its funding of controversial virology research have placed Dr. Anthony Fauci, White House chief medical advisor, in the hot seat.
Amid the US government-led outcry for transparency and finger-pointing in the search for COVID-19's origins, the bombshell NIH letter on 20 October admitted funding of a "limited experiment" in gain-of-function research on bats infected with coronaviruses at a lab in Wuhan, China.
The letter to Rep. James Comer of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform NIH official Lawrence A. Tabak revealed that studies involved testing whether "spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model".
The statement is in stark contrast to earlier denial of any involvement in research that often involves manipulation of pathogens of a naturally-occurring virus in one animal to make it capable of infecting another.
On 11 May, Fauci testified to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions that a $600,000 NIH grant he approved for the WIV was not for "gain-of-function" research.
Later in the year, when asked at a Senate if he would like to retract his May testimony, Fauci, who oversees several NIH research programs as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said: "I have not lied before Congress. Case closed."
Amid GOP-led calls for Fauci's resignation and some lawmakers referring the immunologist to the Justice Department for investigation, the question arises why Biden's chief medical advisor "lied" in the first place, and what, if any, consequences there might be for him.
Why The Lies?
According to a new book, "What Really Happened In Wuhan", by Sharri Markson, Investigations Editor at The Australian, Anthony Fauci was concerned in the early days of the outbreak that his agency had funded gain-of-function work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, furthermore, maybe even funded the laboratory that allegedly caused the pandemic.
Weighing in on whether this prompted the WH medical advisor to lie about the now-revealed funding, as well as insisting that the COVID-19 natural origins theory was a more likely explanation than a lab leak, John Di Lemme, Political commentator and Founder of Conservative Business Journal, agreed. However, he believed that Fauci was less worried about the devastating impact caused by the outbreak. It was "getting caught" that concerned him.
Fauci concealed the information pertaining to the potentially risky and dangerous research because he realized he was, in part, responsible for the pandemic that has killed millions around the globe, claimed Vlad Davidiuk, GOP Strategist and Political Analyst.
"He was profiting from the research and advancing his own career and the interests of those closest to him. It stands to reason that he would do all he could to occult the facts from public disclosure. His insistence that Covid's natural origins theory is a more likely explanation than a lab leak is just one more way that he has actively worked to obfuscate the truth and stifle the investigation," underscored Davidiuk.
The White House scientific advisor was likely to have been under tremendous pressure in the US, especially during the Trump Administration, to align himself with the promotion of the narrative of a "China virus", argued Dr Zeno Leoni, a Teaching Fellow at the Defence Studies Department of King's College London.
"It would have been extremely challenging for Fauci to unveil such a hard truth which would have undermined Trump's hawkish narrative. This, however, is not a justification for not telling the truth, but it needs to be considered," added Dr. Leoni.
What Next?
Anthony Fauci will be prompted by his ego to "continue the charade", lie and claim no knowledge of the funding, predicted John Di Lemme.
Based on previous scandals and issues of transparency in political matters in the US, Dr. Zeno Leoni believed that Fauci will be under much pressure to resign. The analyst did, however, suggest that President Biden might attempt to defend him. This would be likely, believed Leoni, considering that the scientist has been "more aligned to Biden's than to Trump's approach" regarding the management of the pandemic.
Anthony Fauci should have resigned months ago, insisted Vlad Davidiuk.
"Fauci should have resigned months ago but is addicted to the power and prestige he has gained and is clinging to with all his might," said the expert.
Claiming that Biden's medical advisor is unlikely to quit on his own steam, he continued: "The consequences for Dr. Fauci should be severe. Not only is an investigation warranted, but it is also the only way to learn the facts underlying the truth of what really happened... He should be fired immediately."
The recent revelations should definitely prompt Congress to look at the WH scientific advisor's potential involvement with vaccine patents and monetary benefits that he may have received from vaccine production and distribution, suggested John Di Lemme. Reflecting on the blame-game that the US government had been engaged in while ostensibly seeking to discover the "truth" about the origins of COVID-19, he added: "Now, let's see how the Democrats will cover up Fauci's obvious involvement in the pandemic."
However, unless a "smoking gun" is found to prove that Anthony Fauci had knowledge of grant funds being funnelled towards the risky research, there is no way to hold him responsible, concluded John Di Lemme.
Comment: With the popular narrative that Covid is a dangerous virus that has killed millions, and the somewhat alternative narrative that the origins of the virus are from the Wuhan lab, the revelation that Fauci is responsible for gain of function research at the Wuhan lab is a true powder keg. In other words, we may see Fauci shouldering the blame for the entire Covid 'pandemic' and, given how pissed off the entire population is, he could seriously burn for it. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
See also:
- Anthony Fauci Has Been Abusing Animals For 40 Years
- In ABC interview, brazen Fauci lies about lying
- Senator Paul rips Fauci over new report: Americans 'very disturbed at how much he's lied'
- Bipartisan lawmakers demand answers from Fauci about 'cruel' taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs
- Video surfaces of Fauci and HHS officials plotting for 'a new avian flu virus' to enforce universal flu vaccination
- Fauci says people "have to give up what you consider your individual right of making your own decision" on vaccines
- Hugh Hewitt to Fauci: 'Should you step down for destroying public trust?'
Reader Comments
.COULD IT BE THESE ARE FEARFUL SPEWINGS OF PROP-O-GANDHI FROM THE MIGHTY WURLITZER?
EDUCATE YERSELVES :
[Link]
"like attracts like"
your all well and truly in the same boat as "it"..
it sux to be you!!
history will remember you all, as in time all your names being involved will be known, in this life down the track, and especially in the next!!
He should be terminated humanly and those who followed in his footsteps ignored for eternity.
As we reach, almost completion of this current phase, vax vs anti-vax, expect a Big Bang they've got planned to grab the last remnants of power they need for total control. Just look at history, and you'll see this coming. History repeats it's self, because it's the same entities grasping for control over and over again. This time, thanks to global communications, we are at that point where they can grab total control, all based on deceit.
They made sure of this from the beginning of the scam, those that stand up to their shit are kooks. They prepped social media, heck the whole Q movement was planned, so that in the end they could label that whole segment of the populace nuts, regardless of the fact that truths were shown.
Prime example is above. Truths are shown, but those who believe and can see it, are nuts. Disinfo on all levels, so is the corruption. There is no movie knight in shining armor who can take it on and win.
So, sit back, take solace where you can, such as here, hang on real tight and enjoy the show. It's inevitable.
YOU talk like someone who has given up, prepared to take all that abouts to happen as a consequence of your apathetic attitude.
Wars would never have been won if your cowardly attitude had been adopted.
Grow some Balls.
You have the legitimate right to be in opposition, if your voice is not heard your right to oppose the opposition is yours.
It was easier in the old days, as actual leaders lead their armies, today the cowards hide behind their armies. Find the coward and their supporters, should be easier today too, given technology. But, wars today are fixed, driven by the wealthiest families in the background, on both sides. Get rid of those people, the war hawks and the leaders who want war, things will be different.
Wars are started by psycho's and it's always the people and the countries that pay the real price. Those in charge and behind the scenes prosper.
Any real big protest today, is always backed by money. Real people protests (not backed by any money) are usually small and go nowhere. Even MLK had a backer, Ghandi had Minacs funding him, Hitler had a backer or backers, Stalin and Lenin had backers, the 60's protests had backers.
Want to get rid of your local government, people would have to get up off their ass, at the same time, and go straight to the legislator enmass and grab the fuckers out of their chairs and get rid of them and anyone who comes to stop it. That ain't ever going to happen, unless someone with money backs it.
I've done government protests, guess what, they don't give a fuck what you have to say because they get their money and marching orders elsewhere.
So sit back, hang on tight and enjoy the show, they are putting on, cause there is nothing you can do about it, that opportunity was missed 25-30 years ago.
I believe that the First World War would best demonstrates your take of the concept of war, needless death orchestrated by feuds and other wars that are driven by a destabilising force.
I would kingly ask you to research Civil Wars and there origins, they are in essence localised disputes that could not be reconciled and resulted in the need to replace the oppressive bodies that imposed unrealistic agenda's on the population.
You'll be surprised, history littered with them.
Alexander the great, Kublai Khan, Atilla the Hun, American civil war, French Revolution, Caesar Augustus, Julius Caesar, the list goes on. All had interests that involved money land and treasure. Leaders go away, powerful families stay. The US civil war wasn't all about what the history books taught, the US revolution wasn't either. The overall cause is noble, but their is always money to be made by those in power and those backing it. These people, rarely pay the true costs of war (Deaths). They say it's cowardly to get someone to fight your own battles, yet that's how the world works, someone else is always fighting their battles for them. Even if you think it's the people rising up against their leader, it's not. They are doing someone else's dirty work, as evidenced by who ends up in power, always no one who was on the front line getting their hands dirty and their faces bloodied.
I do not want to get into the early pre and up to Solomon's, wars of the Hebrew's, those were different and would take a lot to explain and I'm not into typing about that right now.
I was fascinated by kingship, still am, it's a part of our lives, even today. I've seen and heard arguments for both sides of the coin. Why do we need a king. No true good comes from kingship. Corruption certainly does and although history tells of the odd good king here and there, those dynasties or blood lines always end with some form of corruption. Even in tribal societies, they have corrupt leaders, some tribes allow for the change of leaders, in a semi democratic manner or it's hereditary. But they too experience corruption.
Having a leader, implies they have perceived power over you and they do, as long as you allow for it. Once you have a leader, all of them try to consolidate it and protect themselves from loosing it. Why? Because it's good to be king! Who wants to go back to having to plant, grow and hunt for your own food, when someone else will do it for you. Kings and leaders are meant to reign over the people (look out for their wellbeing), not rein over the people (rule over and control them). Unfortunately history shows and teaches us, that most rein over the people. Money, Sex, Ego, Power, drives people to rein. Even QEII reins over Briton and if you think she doesn't, I can't help you.
These are the people (and those who stand back in the shadows that we barely hear about) , who drive wars and revolutions. Even the story of Troy, was driven by ego.
A good leader will do everything in their power to prevent war from happening and at the same time keep what is good for the country. Not many of those around, throughout our history. If they are, they tend to get one line of mention, cause after all, that's boring, no story to tell.
I said it before and I'll say it again. There needs to be a law in place in all countries, if a leader, his cabinet, generals, money backers want to go to war, then their first born children and grand children should automatically get front line, real grunt work seating, no outs, no OCS, no officers, but sent straight into action on the front lines. Don't worry, It ain't going to happen cause they never want that to happen to their kids. Just yours.
I almost joined the armed forces, I almost joined the masons, I almost became a cop and I actually want to join our CSIS, but each time a little voice in the back of my head (or gut instinct) told me not to, something is not right, the optics are off. Don't get me wrong, I respect all members of any armed forces, for laying down their lives to protect their countrymen. But I also feel sorry for them too, the disrespect they receive from their people and governments and also for the plain and simple fact, that if they saw any action, they were deceived.
If you have a specific example of a true revolution/uprising by the people, for the people and who took charge of their own country, without any backers, I'd really like to know and learn more about them. I haven't been pleasantly surprised about this type of history in a long time. But if I can follow the money, I'm not interested.
I agree with you, overnight, literally, we are living in a true horror movie or dream that you can't get out of and why is this happening to me? Solitude and outside scenic views, help me. This city sucks as even the quiet places of refuge are no more as they too are now over run with covidians, who never used to seek refuge in those quiets places of the city. I can't even walk my dog without seeing 10 other people walking theirs. I even did a midnight walk, so as to not meet anyone and I still met 2. Speaking of which, time to take the creature out for a mini bathroom break.
Maybe when I come back, this nightmare will be over.
So what are YOU doing about it.
Hi, whilst I read and understand your stance, l can't but feel that your missing something? Civil war.
Sounds like FBI talk to me…
I feel that the quintessential essence of how Civil wars are engaged into is not been realised, there enactment is the defining moment when one exercises one's rights to self defense and the justifiability of exercising political power to protect basic human rights.
Our current social climate is clearly been eroded by an unreasonable Government that has no time, patience or appetite to listen to the population, whilst driving through monstrously crippling laws that blatantly run in the face of established laws and rights, that are there as bedrocks to a workable society.
We'll have to agree to disagree, when the government is robbing you of identity, dignity, financial stability, rights and sense of being, sorry, I may be old but I'd rather die fighting for my comrades than bend over and get shafted.
We'll have to agree to disagree, when the government is robbing you of identity, dignity, financial stability, rights and sense of being, sorry, I may be old but I'd rather die fighting for my comrades than bend over and get shafted.
All very true. And the rest of your comment is also valid. I just find it very suspicious that all you seem to be doing is trying to promote civil war. Pretty much every comment is about civil war. I’ve been frequenting SOTT for a while now and I’m fairly certain that you are relatively new? If I’m wrong I apologise. Normally new people here don’t go straight into calling for civil war, in fact they don’t ever really say it. I think many of us have said things along the lines of “the only way this ends is civil uprising/war” but we never outright call for it. It’s not very… SOTTish - for want of a better word.
And yeah, that last couple of lines;
sorry, I may be old but I'd rather die fighting for my comrades than bend over and get shafted.if in doubt, try manipulation/reverse psychology
I also noticed that you have made your last comment a stand alone comment. Why? Is there a legal reason for that? Maybe if we reply to your comment it shows we actively participated rather than you entrapping us?
I apologise if I’m wrong but you scream “plant” to me. Hey your name isn’t Ray, is it? [Link]
In a free society, freedom of speech is essential, whilst my topic may seem raw, given the current political climate, I openly discuss this as is my right to.
I'd like to point out, I'm not the one turning the world upside down, the government is.
I comment on lots of subjects and no, they do NOT have me chomping at the bit screaming WAR, to the contrary.
I have little time for politics, my main interest and past time is spent Earthwatching, something that is far more important and relevant to mankind's position here on Earth.
this evil scum bastard will soon be infront of its judge, i call it an "IT" COS HE IS NO MORAL MAN, ITS A LOVER OF MONEY, A LOVER OF EGO, A DESTROYER OF LIFE, DESTROYER OF MORAL STANDARDS.
it will see and feel every single individuals pain and suffering it has caused, by mental order and physical pain, i would hate to be in "its" shoes, theres no running, no hiding no explanation, and no excuse for what it has done to this planet the last 2 yrs, plus the fact its evil acts upon hapless dogs, regardless what breed they are,
it has brought much hate, again it will feel on the next plane of life, it will experience all and everything it has done,
kind of the same fate hitler is still to this day undergoing in the lower realms, it has been said that ceasar alone and iscariot alone spent nearly 2000 human years of suffering alone for what they did to the citizens and brothers and sisters on this planet regarding there belief, sexuality and religion including ethnicity,
Fauci, meaning "the sickle", angel of death, thats the evil bastards name meaning, so, maybe when this sack of waste eventually drops dead, there will be a planetary party, and the rest of its family will definitely change there last name, like all and every single hitler member did, as all was and were hunted after ww2,
can you imagine where its relatives would go and hide, and what name they would change too, with todays social media etc, it has killed its own family and it has no freakin idea it has done so..
hope its job, pension and living with the tight security paid off, cos in due time, its seriously fooked beyond recognition..
it so sux to be it, and related to such scum of the earth.. enjoy whats coming it, that is well deserved!!