WHO now says your child's presence in school counts as 'informed consent' for vaccination - parental presence 'not required'

This is despicable, we are eroding parental responsibility, rights and decisions in health care and education of their children.

I am reminded of the Human Rights Declaration. The Declaration of the Rights of the Child created in 1959

1. The right to equality, without distinction on account of race, religion or national origin.

2. The right to special protection for the child’s physical, mental and social development.

3. The right to a name and a nationality.

4. The right to adequate nutrition, housing and medical services.

5. The right to special education and treatment when a child is physically or mentally handicapped.

6. The right to understanding and love by parents and society.

7. The right to recreational activities and free education.

8. The right to be among the first to receive relief in all circumstances.

9. The right to protection against all forms of neglect, cruelty and exploitation.

10. The right to be brought up in a spirit of understanding, tolerance, friendship among peoples, and universal brotherhood.

I note that article 9 contains the word exploitation. Seems to me that the WHO is exploiting there position, by not giving the parents the right to choose, informed consent and leaving the decision of consent to vaccinate in the hands of school educators and the medical community, with questionable research and bias.

My thoughts.

Nothing more infuriating than the school attitude. They think they own your children. You barely have a right to feed your children so that the schools can raise them properly. It's sickening.

It seems the safest thing to do is to home school your offspring. No vaccines, no idiot wokies trying to degender your kid, no false education to worry about to name but a few advantages.

WHO is starting to look like a criminal organization. Many parents will be forced to either home school their kids, or when that becomes illegal, move.

Did anyone actually ready the PDF?

This has been taken out of context.

The WHO are not saying "this is how it is", they are saying that a 2012 survey reported that this is one of the ways consent is already being "obtained" by. People reporting this are skewing it and not reading it.

Here is the relevant part of the article:

---

Common approaches for obtaining consent for vaccination



Current practices of obtaining informed consent for vaccination vary among countries, but can be broadly categorized into three approaches.

Approaches to obtain informed consent:

1. Written consent

2. Verbal consent

3. Implied consent

1. A formal, written consent process is used, particularly in middle- and high-income countries that have a higher percentage of literate populations and a longer history of providing vaccination to older age groups.* Vaccination of this target group may be delivered through school health services. Health authorities inform the parents about the vaccination and written consent from the parent is required to opt-in, i.e. give permission for the older child/adolescent to be vaccinated. Alternatively, a written form is used to allow parents to express non-consent (or refusal) to vaccination of their child. This is known as an opt-out procedure.

2. A verbal consent process , whereby consent is given verbally by the parent after being duly informed about the vaccination. However, this approach can only be used when parents accompany the child to the vaccination.

3. An implied consent process by which parents are informed of imminent vaccination through social mobilization and communication, sometimes including letters directly addressed to the parents. Subsequently, the physical presence of the child or adolescent, with or without an accompanying parent at the vaccination session, is considered to imply consent. This practice is based on the opt-out principle and parents who do not consent to vaccination are expected implicitly to take steps to ensure that their child or adolescent does not participate in the vaccination session. This may include not letting the child or adolescent attend school on a vaccination day, if vaccine delivery occurs through schools.

Implied consent procedures are common practice in many countries. However, when children present for vaccination unaccompanied by their parents, it is challenging to determine whether parents indeed provided consent. Therefore, countries are encouraged to adopt procedures that ensure that parents have been informed and agreed to the vaccination . Comprehensive data on whether the approach countries use to deal with consent has changed or evolved over the last decades is not available.

* A WHO survey in 2012 in 34 selected countries from four regions on consent procedures for vaccination in 6–17 year-olds, found that approximately half of the respondent countries use written consent for vaccination in this age group.

I thought you might be interested to know that the above article has been fact-checked by Full Fact and found to be faulty on account of something that the article does not say.

[Link]