OF THE
TIMES
Heaven and hell are eternal places because they are always present at the extremes of human existence, for better or for worse. People are constantly choosing between them, although they are generally not conscious of that in an articulated manner.
Died by being shot in the back.
Any plant that grows here is part of creation. Who are humans to restrict or make illegal part of creation to be used? They declare themselves...
The powers that be do not want to help people in the developing world rise out of poverty. On the contrary - they want to cripple their industrial...
EU must decide fate of military age Ukrainian men - member state Herein lies the fundamental problem with the "EU" - it has no right and authority...
Oh yeah, the Daily Mail, of all shabby British tabloids ... Scientists claim they've had a 20 minute conversation with a WHALE - and say it could...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
The real issue is whether the Russian networks presented the facts of the case honestly, and not about whether they have a right to do so. That question is a matter of law, not political opinion. Of course somebody like Tom Watson, who is (blindly) supporting the dishonesty of the EU case and is confronted by an honest presentation in making knowns the contrary arguments is going to feel grieved that some network would dare do so. They would much sooner have these contrary arguments inadequately presented. That is what happened in the early days of our experience with what was then called (dishonestly) the Common Market. Nobody with a mass audience really presented the truth about the Common Market honestly all those years ago. The British people were shoe horned into the EU based upon shaky and adequate information. It took many of us years finding out the real truth about what we were getting into. What is happening now is that British people are waking up in dribs and drabs until over one half of us are opposed to any further involvement in this foolish quasi fascist would be super state.
RT and the other Russian networks have every right (under British) law to present the facts of the case. They have done so all along, and have presented better than our own mass media networks, who tend to resort to ideological rather than logical arguments. It is probably easy for Tom Watson to confuse the two modes of presentation. He also no doubt wishes to find grounds for objecting to Russian media dealing with British and European issues. The fallacy in his reasoning appears to be some kind of species hominem argument applied to institutions: Objecting to the message because the messenger is a foreign institutional source.