Nicole Darrah
Fox NewsMon, 25 Jun 2018 09:24 UTC
A division of the American Library Association has voted to remove Laura Ingalls Wilder's name from a major children's book award.
Laura Ingalls Wilder's name is set to be removed from a major children's book award after concerns were raised about the "Little House on the Prairie" author's depiction of certain races in the early-to-mid 20th century.
The Association of Library Service to Children's (ALSC) board voted unanimously on Saturday to rename the "Laura Ingalls Wilder Award" as the "Children's Literature Legacy Award."
The association, which took the vote at its board meeting in New Orleans, said the vote
"was greeted by a standing ovation by the audience in attendance."Wilder is best known for her "Little House on the Prairie" novels, which the ALSC has stated "includes expressions of stereotypical attitudes inconsistent with ALSC's core values" based on Wilder's portrayal of black people and Native Americans.The first award was given to Wilder in 1954. The ALSC, which is based in Chicago, says her work continues to be published and read but her "legacy is complex" and "not universally embraced."
Nicole Darrah covers breaking and trending news for FoxNews.com. Follow her on Twitter @nicoledarrah or send her an email at nicole.darrah@foxnews.com.
Comment: More
from the BBC:
Laura Ingalls Wilder removed from book award over racist language
25 June 2018
The US Association for Library Service to Children (ALSC) has removed Laura Ingalls Wilder's name from one of its awards over racist views and language.
The association had received complaints for years over the Little House on the Prairie author's "anti-Native and anti-Black sentiments in her work".
...
The ALSC, a division of the American Library Association, said Wilder's novels and "expressions of stereotypical attitudes" were "inconsistent with ALSC's core values".
Wilder's children's novels about pioneer life in the American West have been criticised for language that dehumanises indigenous peoples and people of colour.
Notably, one of the opening chapters of the Little House books described a land with "no people. Only Indians lived there".
In 1953, the Harper's publishing company decided to change "people" to "settlers", according to the Washington Post .
But the novels continues to raise concerns due to storylines featuring racist stereotypes and attitudes typical of white Americans of Wilder's era.
"The only good Indian is a dead Indian," one character says. At other points in the series, African-American characters are called "darkies".
Some fans of the novels say they offer an important historical perspective and should be used as teaching tools for children.
The letter from the ALSC board noted the "complexity" of this issue and "the emotion surrounding it".
"We acknowledge that Wilder's books not only hold a significant place in the history of children's literature and continue to be read today," the board's recommendation reads .
"We also acknowledge that they have been deeply painful to many readers."
Born in 1867, Wilder was known for her semi-autobiographical Little House on the Prairie novels - a series published between 1932 and 1943.
The novels were adapted to a television series in 1974, running until 1983.
E B White and Dr Seuss are both famous recipients of the Wilder Award.
The decision to remove Wilder from this literary award is the latest move to revise cultural tributes to racist historical figures in the US.
The removal of Confederate memorials by local governments across the country has triggered backlash from some Americans who believe it subverts US history and southern culture.
Racial minorities, especially black Americans, feel that the presence of Confederate symbols in public life is offensive.
So how exactly is this different from Nazi book-burning? No matter how distasteful parts of history may seem, or how many people are made uncomfortable by it, to attempt to revise history in favour of today's cultural norms is treading a truly dangerous path. We can't simply deny, ban, alter or erase the parts of history that we don't like. A beloved children's writer like Ingalls Wilder seems, however unlikely, to be yet another casualty in the censorship of truth. Perhaps
Dr. Seuss and E.B. White will be the next on the chopping block.
See also:
Comment: More from the BBC: So how exactly is this different from Nazi book-burning? No matter how distasteful parts of history may seem, or how many people are made uncomfortable by it, to attempt to revise history in favour of today's cultural norms is treading a truly dangerous path. We can't simply deny, ban, alter or erase the parts of history that we don't like. A beloved children's writer like Ingalls Wilder seems, however unlikely, to be yet another casualty in the censorship of truth. Perhaps Dr. Seuss and E.B. White will be the next on the chopping block.
See also: