OF THE
TIMES
Here is another idea: they should get rid of compound bills like the NDAA. Each law and amendment should be drafted and published at least a month...
There are quite a few things ongoing in the background we are not told about. And not in the "spirit of Anchorage". I suppose the Russians watched...
Forget all this crap, the dude is already dead. He has been dead for weeks now. There are enough hints about it. I don't see the point enumerating...
Throughout history any attempt like this to integrate one country's 'intelligence' apparatus with another's would be considered 'high treason' and...
Hard to know what turns them on more?
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Comment: What the evil old geezer doesn't mention is that a 'radical Iranian empire' would spell the end of the Saudis, the petrodollar and Murika. Is that such a bad thing? Most of the Middle East wouldn't think so, excepting the Zio-nazis.
Is it even a realistic expectation? Iran has shown no more inclination to empire building than Russia. A more likely scenario is that sovereign countries would align with Iran politically and economically as the ASEAN group has with Russia, in pursuit of a common good. That's a long way from an 'Iranian radical empire'. But to non-reality-based Western eyes, it amounts to the same thing.