OF THE
TIMES
This is quite obviously a PM that has no idea of where the 'delete' button is on his social-media platform. What a big-girl's blouse of a PM. I...
Correction. Turn off the ear worms.
Totally agree about the guitar SBC, rock on. Sometimes even musicians require total quiet. To have the ability to quiet the mind and use it at the...
Chris Wray might have added ... "There is every chance that it could even be the same people from ISIS-K ... concert attack in Russia carrying out...
"Thuc Dho is a name created to represent a typical one." - That's not the only thing that was 'created' in this story. I flew Hueys on my first...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Comment: What the evil old geezer doesn't mention is that a 'radical Iranian empire' would spell the end of the Saudis, the petrodollar and Murika. Is that such a bad thing? Most of the Middle East wouldn't think so, excepting the Zio-nazis.
Is it even a realistic expectation? Iran has shown no more inclination to empire building than Russia. A more likely scenario is that sovereign countries would align with Iran politically and economically as the ASEAN group has with Russia, in pursuit of a common good. That's a long way from an 'Iranian radical empire'. But to non-reality-based Western eyes, it amounts to the same thing.