Puppet Masters
The United Kingdom plans to leave the European Union were supported by the EU leadership as the country presented a major hurdle on the way to creating a pan-European army, Polish member of the European Parliament Janusz Korwin-Mikke told Sputnik on Monday.
He was commenting on Sunday's statement by European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, who said that the European Union needed its own armed forces to "fulfill" its mission in the world.
"My opinion [is that] Brexit was supported by Mr. Junker and leadership of the EU because Great Britain was an obstacle to greater unification of the EU and to the European army," the non-attached Polish lawmaker said.
When the idea of the possible creation of the pan-European army first floated many years ago, numerous politicians in the United Kingdom, including then Prime Minister David Cameron, stated that London would never agree to handing defense powers from London to Brussels as it would undermine the member states' military competence and lead to competition with and duplication of NATO. That practically meant that the United Kingdom would veto any common defense plans as all such EU decisions must be taken unanimously.
In May, one month before the referendum on the UK fate in the European Union, The Times reported, citing EU diplomats, that plans to enhance the military role of the bloc, potentially paving way for a future EU army, were being held back until after the UK vote to avoid giving succor to the Leave campaign.
With Britain's decision to leave the bloc, this hurdle on the way is to be removed. Some politicians are supportive of the idea of creating a common army partly out of fear that without the British army, the strongest military in the European Union, Brussels' military capabilities will decrease.
"I'm afraid there are chances; if they were not, Mr. Junker wouldn't speak about it," Korwin-Mikke added, asked whether plans for the EU-wide army may ever materialize.
The bloc currently has no army, but it encourages military co-operation between member countries, which already run joint operations.
Reader Comments
Both the article and the comment (sorry Carolina4) are completely off base. Nobody understood and of course it wasn't mentioned in the lame stream media what the Brexit show was/is all about :
#1 : It hasn't been put into effect yet. The announcement by the Brits that they want to leave were just warning shots...to the Rothschild.
#2 : Had it been activated immediately it would have brought economic chaos in Europe for the following reason : Since 1975 the Brits have started selling everything they owned. Their stock exchange to the U.S. , their power corporation to the French, their Royal
mail and so on and so forth (HFL correct me if I'm wrong). On the other hand they haven't been producing anything, so that created a tremendous imbalance which was covered by borrowing. If they have done one smart thing that was keeping their currency. So if they
left that would be a tremendous economic blow to the rest of Europe that have been lending them money for the past 40 years in all currencies , euro included (of course back in 1975 there was no euro but other European currencies still existed). If they left now
all the lenders would be unable to collect legally since the Brits would be outside of the club and only they know how much money they owe, but it certainly is more than a lot.
#3 : On top of all that it would be a safe exit since the U.S. would have no problem in keep on lending them since basically it's their base in Europe.
I'm not goin to criticize the Brits or their attitude towards the rest of Europe. That's beside the point. I'm merely stating the facts.
P.S. The Europeans are not interested in creating a unified European army.
Yes they are, actually.
Comment: Further reading: