hillary clinton
© a katz/Shutterstock.com
Judging by the top trending Google searches about presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, it seems that people have one thing they want to know:

Is Hillary Clinton going to jail?

Out of all the searches regarding the former Secretary of State, the most popular query was whether she would be imprisoned. These queries undoubtedly stem from the numerous violation of law surrounding her use of a private email server, as well the possibility of using her position in public office for personal gain via the Clinton Foundation.

Google has been the target of criticism by some that claim that the company hides negative search results regarding Clinton — with their autocorrect feature being accused of neglecting information relating to crimes committed by Hillary Clinton.

Aside from the email/data security crimes committed by Clinton, while trying to subvert the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the Clinton Foundation has taken hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign nations in exchange for political favors and/or lucrative business deals while Clinton was Secretary of State. Many perceive these donations as a violation of US Law 2635.702 - Use of a Public Office for Personnel Gain.


Many feel that the fix is already in as they believe that Clinton is being protected from indictment by Obama and his Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, who was appointed to the post of U.S. attorney for New York's Eastern District by President Bill Clinton in 1999.

The idea that corporate media, government, and large technology companies collaborate to create a false sense of reality in an effort to drive a specific elite chosen narrative has been the stuff of conspiracy legend for years. However, thanks to the Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, the Freedom of Information Act, and WikiLeaks, the inner workings of how empire operates have been clearly put on display for the world to see.

In March, the Free Thought Project reported on the explosive emails revealing how the U.S. State Department and Google worked in concert to topple the government of elected Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in an attempt at forwarding U.S. geopolitical strategy.

Prior to that report, we revealed Clinton's cozy relationship with Google and YouTube after an email chain exposed the internet giant bowing down to Clinton's demand for censorship.

In another bombshell revelation, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has backed up Clinton and Google's relationship, claiming they are working together to promote the Democratic presidential candidate.


Comment: When the original WikiLeaks Clinton email release happened back in March, Facebook blocked users' access to the leak - users who tried to follow a link from Facebook received an error message.


In July, Facebook blocked the "Liberty Memes" page, suspending their account, and had memes mocking Killary deleted from their page. The page had over 100K likes, and one of the deleted Killary memes had 10K likes, 50K shares, and 4 million views before it was removed for "violating community standards." An admin for the page told Breitbart: "Our page has two admins, and both of our accounts are currently on suspensions of varied duration. This isn't the first time that they have taken down our innocuous posts claiming that they violate community standards. I'm currently on my second 30 day ban from my Facebook account". The memes in question:
hillary meme
hillary meme
Scandalous!

Shortly after the WikiLeaks revelation, the group SourceFed actually found evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton.





Comment: An alleged Google employee wrote that management would not deny rigging the autocomplete on negative Killary searches. From the Daily Caller (June 15):
Reddit user "techguytryingtomaga" recounted his story in a post to the /r/the_donald subreddit on Tuesday.

"I saw the SourceFed video about Google censoring negative Hillary results from autofill. I went and tried it out myself. It seemed conclusive," he wrote. "But there had to be something right?"

"Google has this thing, in the name of transparency, where all employees get to ask management questions publicly and get them answered publicly. It's pretty cool and it wouldn't fly at a lot of 'old world' companies. And we only get to have it if we are all super trustworthy and don't share what happens," he continued. "And so when someone asked about the Hillary censorship thing I got excited. Hopeful. Please, f***ing explain this to me so I can understand."

However, instead of getting a yes or no answer, "techguytryingtomaga" claims Google management flat out refused to respond to the question. "I wanted one word. 'No.' I wanted one sentence. 'Here's why: XYZ.' But no. They just dodged it in a display worthy of a career politician. It was easy. Oh so easy. 'We can't respond', they said as a response."