© theswcsun.com
My students are know-nothings. They are exceedingly nice, pleasant, trustworthy, mostly honest, well-intentioned, and utterly decent. But their brains are largely empty, devoid of any substantial knowledge that might be the fruits of an education in an inheritance and a gift of a previous generation.
They are the culmination of western civilization, a civilization that has forgotten nearly everything about itself, and as a result, has achieved near-perfect indifference to its own culture.It's difficult to gain admissions to the schools where I've taught - Princeton, Georgetown, and now Notre Dame. Students at these institutions have done what has been demanded of them: they are superb test-takers, they know exactly what is needed to get an A in every class (meaning that they rarely allow themselves to become passionate and invested in any one subject); they build superb resumes. They are respectful and cordial to their elders, though easy-going if crude with their peers. They respect diversity (without having the slightest clue what diversity is) and they are experts in the arts of non-judgmentalism (at least publically). They are the cream of their generation, the masters of the universe, a generation-in-waiting to run America and the world.
But ask them some basic questions about the civilization they will be inheriting, and be prepared for averted eyes and somewhat panicked looks. Who fought in the Peloponnesian War? Who taught Plato, and whom did Plato teach? How did Socrates die? Raise your hand if you have read both the
Iliad and the
Odyssey. The
Canterbury Tales?
Paradise Lost? The
Inferno?
Who was Saul of Tarsus? What were the 95 theses, who wrote them, and what was their effect? Why does the Magna Carta matter? How and where did Thomas Becket die? Who was Guy Fawkes, and why is there a day named after him? What did Lincoln say in his Second Inaugural? His first Inaugural? How about his third Inaugural? What
are the
Federalist Papers?
Some students, due most often to serendipitous class choices or a quirky old-fashioned teacher, might know a few of these answers. But most students have not been educated to know them. At best, they possess accidental knowledge, but otherwise are masters of systematic ignorance. It is not their "fault" for pervasive ignorance of western and American history, civilization, politics, art and literature. They have learned exactly what we have asked of them - to be like mayflies, alive by happenstance in a fleeting present.
Our students' ignorance is not a failing of the educational system - it is its crowning achievement. Efforts by several generations of philosophers and reformers and public policy experts โ whom our students (and most of us) know nothing about โ have combined to produce a generation of know-nothings. The pervasive ignorance of our students is not a mere accident or unfortunate but correctible outcome, if only we hire better teachers or tweak the reading lists in high school. It is the consequence of a civilizational commitment to civilizational suicide. The end of history for our students signals the End of History for the West.
During my lifetime, lamentation over student ignorance has been sounded by the likes of E.D. Hirsch, Allan Bloom, Mark Bauerlein and Jay Leno, among many others. But these lamentations have been leavened with the hope that appeal to our and their better angels might reverse the trend (that's an allusion to Lincoln's first inaugural address, by the way). E.D. Hirsch even worked up a self-help curriculum, a do-it yourself guide on how to become culturally literate, imbued with the can-do American spirit that cultural defenestration could be reversed by a good reading list in the appendix.
Broadly missing is sufficient appreciation that this ignorance is the intended consequence of our educational system, a sign of its robust health and success.We have fallen into the bad and unquestioned habit of thinking that our educational system is broken, but it is working on all cylinders.
What our educational system aims to produce is cultural amnesia, a wholesale lack of curiosity, history-less free agents, and educational goals composed of content-free processes and unexamined buzz-words like "critical thinking," "diversity," "ways of knowing," "social justice," and "cultural competence."Our students are the achievement of a systemic commitment to producing individuals without a past for whom the future is a foreign country, cultureless ciphers who can live anywhere and perform any kind of work without inquiring about its purposes or ends, perfected tools for an economic system that prizes "flexibility" (geographic, interpersonal, ethical).
In such a world, possessing a culture, a history, an inheritance, a commitment to a place and particular people, specific forms of gratitude and indebtedness (rather than a generalized and deracinated commitment to "social justice"), a strong set of ethical and moral norms that assert definite limits to what one ought and ought not to do (aside from being "judgmental") are hindrances and handicaps.
Regardless of major or course of study, the main object of modern education is to sand off remnants of any cultural or historical specificity and identity that might still stick to our students, to make them perfect company men and women for a modern polity and economy that penalizes deep commitments. Efforts first to foster appreciation for "multi-culturalism" signaled a dedication to eviscerate any particular cultural inheritance, while the current fad of "diversity" signals thoroughgoing commitment to de-cultured and relentless homogenization.
We Must Know...What?Above all, the one overarching lesson that students receive is the true end of education: the only essential knowledge is that know ourselves to be radically autonomous selves within a comprehensive global system with a common commitment to mutual indifference. Our commitment to mutual indifference is what binds us together as a global people. Any remnant of a common culture would interfere with this prime directive: a common culture would imply that we share something thicker, an inheritance that we did not create, and a set of commitments that imply limits and particular devotions.
Ancient philosophy and practice praised as an excellent form of government a
res publica - a devotion to public things, things we share together. We have instead created the world's first
Res Idiotica - from the Greek word
idiotes, meaning "private individual."
Our education system produces solipsistic, self-contained selves whose only public commitment is an absence of commitment to a public, a common culture, a shared history. They are perfectly hollowed vessels, receptive and obedient, without any real obligations or devotions.They won't fight against anyone, because that's not seemly, but they won't fight for anyone or anything either. They are living in a perpetual
Truman Show, a world constructed yesterday that is nothing more than a set for their solipsism, without any history or trajectory.
I love my students - like any human being, each has enormous potential and great gifts to bestow upon the world. But I weep for them, for what is rightfully theirs but hasn't been given. On our best days, I discern their longing and anguish and I know that their innate human desire to know who they are, where they have come from, where they ought to go, and how they ought to live will always reassert itself. But even on those better days, I can't help but hold the hopeful thought that the world they have inherited - a world without inheritance, without past, future, or deepest cares - is about to come tumbling down, and that this collapse would be the true beginning of a real education.
About the authorPatrick Deneen is David A. Potenziani Memorial Associate Professor of Constitutional Studies at Notre Dame.
Thank you, Professor, for perfectly expressing what I have been observing, and lamenting, for the past 20+ years. The only thing you didn't cover is who or what is responsible for the detached pliability of the millennial generation that we see today. It is the result of a conspiracy. A conspiracy with the intended overthrow of all national governments, especially of the United States, in order that a "One World Government" may, in the near future (they hope), take charge of everyone and everything on the Earth.
Research the terms, "New World Order" and the United Nation's, "Agenda 21" to get a small sampling of what our would-be future rulers have in mind for the future of mankind...all under their benevolent (or not so benevolent) control, of course.
Here's David Rockefeller, brother of former U.S. Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, on this subject: [Link]
Here's former U.S. President George H.W. Bush on the "New World Order: "[Link]
The "dumbing-down", if you will, of the upcoming generation is part and parcel of this conspiracy. The political left has long ago taken over the education system in America with the goal of teaching young people just enough to make them think that they are self determining in life, but a generation of young people who have no real concept of their history, even their relatively recent past, can have no idea of who they are, or truly ought to be, and will therefore be more easily manipulated to "fit in" to the ordered future that the "elite" of the world have in store for them.
God help them.