Matt Cicero, a "mobile patrol officer" employed in the Cleveland school district where the late Tamir Rice was a student
has been placed on paid vacation (officially called "administrative leave") after publishing a Facebook post in which he
denigrated the victim of a police killing, insulted his grieving mother, imputed pecuniary motives to the family's decision to pursue a lawsuit โ and, most seriously, expressed a clear intent to kill other children should he find himself in similar circumstances.
Twelve-year-old Tamir Rice, who was playing in a park with a plastic pellet gun resembling an authentic handgun, was killed by Cleveland Police Officer Timothy Loehmann within two seconds of the officer's arrival on the scene. Loehmann and his partner responded to a 911 report of what appeared to be a gun-toting male of indeterminate age, although the caller specified that the apparent weapon was "probably" a toy. Loehmann,
whose personnel record unambiguously described someone unqualified to be a police officer, was clearly primed to kill Rice โ and the victim never had time to comply with an order to drop his toy. Nor did the shooter or his partner render medical aid to their victim.
Following
the template used in
the investigation of Darren Wilson's shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri,
Cuyahoga County District Attorney Timothy McGinty referred the Tamir Rice shooting to a grand jury, but rather than seeking an indictment he conducted a mini-trial in which he acted as both prosecutor and defense attorney for Officer Loehmann. Thisrais yielded the entirely predictable โ and, most likely, intended โ result when the grand jury declined to indict Rice's killer.
In the December 29 press conference announcing the grand jury decision, McGinty insisted that "the plus side of this tragic event" is that "there have been lessons learned already in this case.... And it should never happen again."
According to Officer Cicero โ whose views are most likely representative of at least a significant portion of his peers โ the only relevant "lesson" in the Tamir Rice killing is that police officers have an unqualified right to kill anybody, of any age, they perceive as a threat, and when this happens to a child only the victim and his parents are responsible."Tamir rices momma just want money,"
wrote Cicero in sub-literate language that typified
the undemanding intellectual standards of his occupation. "Lets make the proper changes ... raise your kids not to play with fake guns stupid bitch. All this media bc the are notngetting what they want. Again .....pleeze anyone who does not like what i post.....unfriendly me or block me your not worth my time."
Responding to a comment that a child playing with a toy gun shouldn't "become a solid platform for the death penalty," Cicero wrote: "You pull out a gun you get shot. I dont have time to ask questions and coddle kids that wave guns around. White black purple or green. It comes down to parenting and the lack of it."
To fortify what he considered a compelling argument, Cicero also re-posted a popular law enforcement meme depicting a man pointing two nearly identical pistols at the camera and inviting the viewer to determine "which one is a BB gun? Oops, too late ... you're dead."
In the case of Tamir Rice, the victim was shot before he could react to whatever demands were bellowed at him by the privileged killed. There is also no evidence that Rice was "waving" his plastic toy gun in the direction of the cop who killed him in burst of uninformed panic.
Like many, perhaps most, men who go into law enforcement, Cicero probably played with toy guns as a child. This doesn't represent a parental delinquency, but reflects the ubiquity of firearms in American culture. Furthermore, if Rice had been an adult openly carrying a firearm in Cleveland, his behavior โ whatever one thinks of its wisdom โ would have been in compliance with Ohio law.
A reporter for Cleveland's ABC affiliate confronted Lester Fultz, Chief of Safety and Security for the Cleveland Metropolitan School District, about Officer Cicero's Facebook comments, but was unable to elicit a response. Shortly thereafter Cicero was told to go on his paid vacation.
"The comments posted are particularly insensitive, considering that Officer Cicero works for the school district that served Tamir Rice and his family," said school district CEO Eric Gordon. "Even as we grieve the tragic loss of this child to his family and to our entire school community, we are mindful of the very difficult job of our safety forces in our schools and our communities. Neither our citizens nor those who police our communities should be painted with a broad brush, and I don't believe we will ever find solutions to such complex issues through Facebook postsโespecially posts that further divide us."
Given that Cicero's remarks weren't sufficient to justify terminating his employment, no rhetorical "broad brush" is required to support certain conclusions about the attitudes among his colleagues.
One significant difference between the "school community" and those, like Cicero, who "police" it is that the latter see themselves as an occupation force whose personal safety is paramount, and who can kill without clear justification or significant consequences.
We honored our lawmen for taking those risks.
Can we still say that today? The question before us now is what do we have in our own backyards? Shootings such as the Tamir Rice shooting are hair raising pivotal events, even if not fully understood by the people themselves right now.
When a child has a gun the rational assumption isn't that they are going to shoot you as a policeman. One of the six primary purposes of public education is to indoctrinate a respect and automatic submissive response to authority.
I can say that. I know what a cop is supposed to be and I know what I want the cops in my neighborhood to be.
These aren't cops I want either in my own neighborhood or in anyone else's neighborhood.
I don't call driving up along side a supposedly armed suspect and blasting them before you're even out of the door either a logical or rational decision. More like one where in there is an instinctive reaction.
Above all else there is a reason that these so called officers are not being indicted because to do so is an indictment of the police training system, and that is, in itself, an indictment of the system itself. It shows a complete and total lack of concern for public service by the very system which supposedly exists to serve, and which is now manifestly one with a total devotion to self serving private interests.
Such a system does not require the services of compassionate humans, ones willing to put their lives on the line for the sake of determining whether a child holds a real gun or a fake one, and which in either case is nearly immaterial since only shooting a child would the final and last resort. At least it would have been in the olden days.
No, it requires the services of automaton's conditioned to react, and to react without conscience based on a clearly defined set of circumstances, and which are deemed legal and justifiable based on the right of self defense. As long as the automatons can justify a reasonable reaction they will be protected by the system which they are now re-designed to serve.
Every person that ever worn a uniform knows it is possible to manipulate a situation in order to justify an action.
As citizens you need to understand this, because how a policeman chooses to act is what defines good from evil.
The very choices that they make define who they serve and what they value personally.
I submit to all of you that this set of definitions is not the same as it once was because the system itself is no longer the servant of the people, rather the reverse.
If we as citizens are to honor our law enforcement officers, then it is precisely because they are willing to put their lives at risk in exactly such incidences as this one, it's what they are supposed to be paid to do, it's the very heart of being a lawman.
There's a lot of justified outrage over this shooting and many others. The issue is who are police serving?
Who is hiring them? How are they being selected? Who makes the selection? Who answers for their actions?
Do not expect this system to uphold the values of the people. This much is clear because it is no longer party to the people but to the wealthy. It does not serve the people, it serves the wealthy.
I watched this video repeatedly. Whatever training there might have been for dealing with situations like these is non existent IMO. Who trains an officer to pull the squad car right up to a quote "armed person waving a gun?"
Would it not have been logical to have first stopped short of the suspect and to have taken positions of cover?
Wouldn't it make more sense to have used the police cruisers PA to call on the "suspect" to put down the gun?
WTF are these morons doing pulling right up to a supposedly armed and presumably dangerous individual in the
first place? Who does that? Was this then the action of an idiot or one of storm trooper?
So ya know, it's hard for me personally to swallow this explanation of having a gun pointed at you. As an adult I've had toy guns pointed at me, I've even had real ones pointed at me, but I never shot anyone for doing it and even
when I might legally have had some justification for doing so.
As a kid I used to walk a couple miles with my friends through town carrying our BB guns and no one ever bothered us. I am positive that no parent was the least bit worried about the cops murdering their children for doing so.
This is an outrage, I mean this is the worst thing I have ever seen in my entire life, the worst judgement, the worst reaction, the worst of everything.
People, you better wake up out there. You better wake up to this gun grab scam, to the thugs behind it. You better wake up while you still can.