To your request of my opinion of the manner in which a newspaper should be conducted so as to be most useful, I should answer, 'by restraining it to true facts and sound principles only.' Yet I fear such a paper would find few subscribers. It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more completely deprive the nation of its benefits, than is done by its abandoned prostitution to falsehood. Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. I will add that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false.
¬ Reply by the U.S. President to John Norvell, 1807
In 2020, the world was still a very different one. On the surface, the West still seemed to be in the driver's seat, and nobody could challenge...
The CA. fires are no accident, not incompetence, but deliberate warfare. [Link]
That's cool. Since there gonna be no options, will just pee quetly in the starbucks corner...
Hummm, guess it's better than being smash by a diversity import.
People Planners? Good luck getting people into any "corral". ~60% are in, with little effort. Getting the remaining 40% will never happen, and...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2025 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
We need to get away from the rhetoric and just LOOK.
These people obviously have it all worked out. Their beliefs and attitudes make sense to them. I am sure they go about their jobs and raise their families just like anybody else. But they feel a need to "defend Israel against anti-Zionism."
This is the problem with using a label like "Zionist" or "Black" or "Liberal" or "Scientologist" and blaming some incident or fact of existence on "them." This is all just propaganda war and will lead to no true understanding. In the end we must identify real individuals doing real things. And if the evidence is clear, or if they admit it, then they should be held responsible.
Bad apples hide in most groups. Few groups have any effective means of detecting and removing such individuals. Some groups seem to welcome such, and when they do they may be labeled as "criminal groups." But the fact remains that crimes are committed by real people, not by generalities.