© unknownSwiss police
The substance of the case dates back to New Year's Eve, 2006, when a 16-year-old Eritrean boy was stopped on two separate occasions by police in Lausanne.
The teenager claimed that on the second occasion, a patrol officer drenched him in pepper spray, and abandoned him near a forest.
His attempts to lodge complaints later that night were rejected by police authorities.
The case eventually went to court, and the policeman was acquitted, based on testimony by his colleagues. Some months later, however, a fellow officer who'd left the force accused those colleagues of lying under oath, to cover up police brutality. This lead a Swiss court to look deeper into the matter and investigate all accusations brogught forward against the officers.
After more than six years the court in Yverdon-les-Bains handed down the suspended fines to the officers on Friday, saying the victim's statements were "largely credible", although contradictions about the case remained.
The court said there was "sufficient evidence" that the officers were guilty of abusing their authority and causing bodily harm. However it qualified their action as "light", considering the circumstances.
Judge Eric Eckert said that in this case the police tactic was "illegal" and "disproportionate". "The rules clearly state that minors should be taken home, not to the woods."
Canton Vaud public prosecutor Eric Cottier told the court the police practice of removing troublemakers from city centres could be justified in certain cases but needed to be legally backed up and its limits spelled out.
The police denied using pepper spray on the victim, a claim he had made a few days after the incident happened. The court said it was "certain" that the pepper spray use and the trip to the forest had taken place. Three former police officers testified as such during the case.
"Thank you"
It was the third time that the case had gone before a court, with the police having been acquitted previously by cantonal and federal courts.
"After a six-and-a-half-year battle the Vaud court has finally found that I did not make this up. I thank them from the bottom of my heart," said the victim after the verdict.
A lawyer for one of the police said an appeal was likely to be lodged. Disappointed in the outcome, he said it was surprising considering the practice of removing offenders was something "officers had been taught".
The police officer who used the pepper spray was handed a higher 20-day suspended fine, while the other was given ten-day suspended fine.
Reader Comments
to our Newsletter