It can be found in public company reports hosted on mainstream media that Monsanto scooped up the Beeologics firm back in September 2011. During this time the correlation between Monsanto's GM crops and the bee decline was not explored in the mainstream, and in fact it was hardly touched upon until Polish officials addressed the serious concern amid the monumental ban. Owning a major organization that focuses heavily on the bee collapse and is recognized by the USDA for their mission statement of "restoring bee health and protecting the future of insect pollination" could be very advantageous for Monsanto.
In fact, Beelogics' company information states that the primary goal of the firm is to study the very collapse disorder that is thought to be a result - at least in part - of Monsanto's own creations. Their website states:
While its primary goal is to control the Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) and Israeli Acute Paralysis Virus (IAPV) infection crises, Beeologics' mission is to become the guardian of bee health worldwide.What's more, Beelogics is recognized by the USDA, the USDA-ARS, the media, and 'leading entomologists' worldwide. The USDA, of course, has a great relationship with Monsanto. The government agency has gone to great lengths to ensure that Monsanto's financial gains continue to soar, going as far as to give the company special speed approval for their newest genetically engineered seed varieties. It turns out that Monsanto was not getting quick enough approval for their crops, which have been linked to severe organ damage and other significant health concerns.
Steve Censky, chief executive officer of the American Soybean Association, states it quite plainly. It was a move to help Monsanto and other biotechnology giants squash competition and make profits. After all, who cares about public health?
"It is a concern from a competition standpoint," Censky said in a telephone interview.It appears that when Monsanto cannot answer for their environmental devastation, they buy up a company that may potentially be their 'experts' in denying any such link between their crops and the bee decline.
. . . just how it was that Beelogics came to be sold.
I mean, you've put yourself in the business of finding what's wrong, you've worked at it for presumably some time and during that time you never came upon a clue that RoundUp et al. might be a factor.
That seems unlikely, and given what might well be more, rather than less likely why on earth would you sell out to the very "company" about which you had suspicions ? ?
There are many times when I wish I could be a time traveling fly on the wall with a built-in micro sound recorder, who also just happens to own an enormous and CIA bullet proof publishing empire; an -- honest -- publishing empire.
Oh, I'd also be capable of traveling into probable futures and thereby keep my little self out of harm's way . . . if you catch my drift.