OF THE
TIMES
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people.
Plato was a Jethro Tull fan. 'Living In The Past' requires spot-on timing.
"Comment: It's unlikely that China is planning to 'attack' the US in any way, because it has suffered all kinds of provocation and its...
One of Gs descriptions of man, is he is in prison and does not know he is in prison. What is the nature of that prison? G gives the story of the...
Homeschooling is better. I didn’t learn shit in school, due to the harassment from my “fellow peers” and the administration. Trade school should...
DR. David Martin 'COVID Select Committee Cover-up' [Link]
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
... Note the words used in this article such as "likely," "possibly," these words are the mantra for modern day researchers for the lack of clear information and shows their grand delusion of truth. The basic assumption researchers have made is erroneous and having done that they are trying to fit everything to suit their erroneous assumption. If we start with the assumed reality that 2+2 = 5 then our whole arithmetic, no matter how impressive it is, is going to be wrong in finally. How can a computer model designed today show me what were the conditions thousands of years ago. This is absolute foolishness. They cannot even have a computer model to show me what happened in Uganda last week !!!
The assumption made by scientists in this case, for the lack of any better proof is that Humans evolved from Neanderthals. Where is the proof of this? They say evolution takes millions of years of gradual change so where is the fossil evidence of 100% Neanderthal leading to a gradual 90% Neanderthal-10% human mix, which should at some time lead to 50% Neanderthal-50% human mix, and gradually 10% Neanderthal-90% human mix, and finally a 100% pure human. This is what I would consider as absolute proof. Not some vague assumption and guess work or speculation.
If you really go looking for hints of genetic similarities, you will see that we also have fish gene as we both have eyes and blood. Science should mean Perfection. No room for guess work and speculation as is the case here.
Sad that the very faith that researchers denounce of religionists of adhering to, is exactly what they demand of their modern day blind followers. Modern day scientists are mostly a few corrupt megalomaniacs hungry for power, recognition and awards - not to mention, they have also claimed the position of God in society, a society as a result that is in absolute misery with no one healthy, happy, fulfilled or satisfied.