Secret History
Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.
The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.
Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.
"It was very interesting to discover that he belonged to a genetic group in Europe -- there were many possible groups in Egypt that the DNA could have belonged to," said Roman Scholz, director of the iGENEA Centre.
Around 70 percent of Spanish and 60 percent of French men also belong to the genetic group of the Pharaoh who ruled Egypt more than 3,000 years ago.
"We think the common ancestor lived in the Caucasus about 9,500 years ago," Scholz told Reuters.
It is estimated that the earliest migration of haplogroup R1b1a2 into Europe began with the spread of agriculture in 7,000 BC, according to iGENEA.
However, the geneticists were not sure how Tutankhamun's paternal lineage came to Egypt from its region of origin.
The centre is now using DNA testing to search for the closest living relatives of "King Tut".
"The offer has only been publicised for three days but we have already seen a lot of interest," Scholz told Reuters.
Reader Comments
....very interesting ....many Egyptians today are more so Arabic rather than "ancient".........did anyone compare with the coptic remnants in Egypt. The French Sabbah brothers wrote an interesting book on the Secrets of the Exodus.........
may do well to read 'The Secret History of the World'. That ought to give them some, uh, clues!!!
Picasso used the color red in his paintings. Are all paintings which use red now related to picasso's painting?
Anyone who gets excited by this news doesn't know anything about dna and how it relates to you being you.
It's nonsense and reeks of eugenics for the common man. Same as that "only non-black people have neanderthal genes" which is in the same category.
Trust me when I say they are just trying to piece together a painting using a caleidoscope. DNA science is nowhere near these definite answers.
...Is that all this proves is that this particular gene cluster was present in humans at the time of King Tut. The presence of the gene cluster in Tut alone does not prove that he was an ancestor of these portions of European population. In other words, the conclusion of the data is not only clearly flawed, but it is flawed in a way that an awake and aware 5th grader could spot. It doesn't matter where or how the data was gathered - although we can debunk that too. For example, how do any genetic researchers know how much of the percentage of any modern population contain a certain gene cluster? Have they tested everyone? No. They are basing that on some portion of known statistics, whose sample volume must be decidedly less than the total population.
But it doesn't matter - even if we assume that the modern percentages for the presence of this gene cluster are accurate, we still have a glaring logical flaw - that all it proves is that this particular gene cluster was present in humanity at the time of King Tut. It proves absolutely nothing else.
These guys are getting better at this! I wonder how far they will be able to take it before they are silenced.
I hope readers see how significant this find is. That an African ruler belonged to a European blood line.
Doesn't it help to explain some of the European esoteric and political interest in Egypt and the Middle East? I hope no one thinks that no one in Europe knew about this connection before it was reported by these researchers!
But a group "in the Caucasus about 9,500 years ago" well-describes the supposed peoples theorized years ago to be the source of the Indo-European family of languages. The spread of a language does not necessarily mean the parallel spread of a blood line. But in this case, European genetics have now been traced to both the ancient ruling families of Egypt and to the modern ruling castes of India.
That gives a certain amount of credence to the idea that long-time European interest in these seemingly disconnected geographic areas go deeper than mere economic advantage.