© PAIf any new inquest returned an open verdict it could trigger a fresh police investigation into Dr Kelly's death.
- Why did the detective who found Dr Kelly's body not tell the Hutton Inquiry that there was a third man in a suit with him and his partner when the body was discovered?
- How did Dr Kelly cut his left wrist if, as friends said, he had previously damaged his right arm to such a degree that he struggled cutting steak?
- Why was the ulnar artery severed rather than the radial, which is how the cut would "naturally" have been made, from left to right, with the right hand?
- Why were there no fingerprints on the knife when Dr Kelly was not wearing gloves? Nor on the bottle from which he supposedly drank to swallow 29 painkillers?
- Why did the helicopter which passed over the scene with heat-seeking equipment not detect the body soon after death?
- Why was his body said to be in a different position from when it was first found to when it was first treated?
- Why did the head of the investigation into Dr Kelly's death not give evidence to Hutton?
- Where are Dr Kelly's computers?
- Why did Lord Hutton place a 70-year embargo on release of the post-mortem examination documents?
still any doubt that Dr Kelly was murdered and the authorities are covering it up ? There isn't gonna be any re-openning of the case as this would prove an already obvious cover up and even if there is all evidence is gone thus nothing can be "officially" proven.