OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
Perhaps some people may understand now why the Zionists have said long ago: constant remembrance of the holocaust is necessary in order to bring...
This should pinpoint some things [Link]
Well the Israelis are doing a pretty good job of chanting slogans Like Kill all the Gazan's and kill all the Iranians. What's the difference. The...
"To The Last Ukrainian" Sep, 2023 . [Link]
They hate people have an alternative information source they have no control of.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
If it is, then its a case of "double-dipping". You pay once for virus-protection and all the updates for a year. Anything from $40-$100 plus.
But this leads me to the con that is foisted on us each year:
The greater part of the work invested in the software has to be in the program. The logically right way to charge would be an up-front fee covering the program development and first years virus definitions, and then each year a maintenance fee to cover ongoing development of the virus signatures for virii found each year.
So ... why do we have to keep on paying the intitial development fee?