Research Scientist Dr. Roy W. Spencer (the University of Alabama), is so disturbed by the lies governments are using as an excuse to impose destructive policies that he has taken to public polemics. He has been engaged in the fight since at least 2004. His effectiveness is indicated by the sheer number of hardcore Leftists who expend many words smearing him, as even a cursory google search shows.
Author of, Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians, and Misguided Policies that Hurt the Poor, he makes what at first seems a recondite point. Subtle, it is easily missed but, a few moments consideration reflects, the gentleman has delivered a real blow to the liars:
You might be surprised to learn that there has never been a single scientific paper published which has ruled out natural climate variability for most of our current global-mean warmth. Not one...Not one paper! This is staggering in its force. The left dominated media, and the politicians, not only Leftists, but of the Right and their "thunk tanks", have asserted the science is in, AGW is true. Secondly, they have resorted to the falsehood of 'consensus'. Those 'scientists' who have been willing to betray sound science to grab hold of the billions of taxed dollars governments throw at the Greens' cult of death have been more dishonest than has been assumed.
Instead, since Mr. Carbon Dioxide was found at the scene of the crime - albeit without the murder weapon - there is no need to search for any other culprits or accomplices. The circumstantial evidence has convicted him. Even though Mr. Carbon Dioxide is necessary for life on Earth, we are now calling him derogatory names, like "pollutant."
As the mass hysteria calling for an end to carbon dioxide production has accelerated, ethanol has arisen as the new messiah of radical environmentalism, promising to assuage our guilty enviro-consciences when we choose to starve more of the world's poor.
Now is the time for the people to speak up. We need leaders who will tell us to stop running toward the edge of the cliff. That cliff is fast approaching, and unless someone has the courage to stand up for the rights of humans to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the momentum we have generated due to our irrational fears will cause us all to topple into the sea.
The boosters are covering themselves by slipping in the truth but in such a way it is missed. This is not bad science, it is fraudulent charlatanism. It is corrupt, and it is insidious in the implications. Debasement of science, the rise of the cult of nature, the descent into superstition and mysticism in the 19th century was bound up with the emergence of totalitarian regimes in the twentieth century. This is what "AGW" is.
The Right, given the millions they have poured into their "kerplunk tanks", have not attacked the movement and politicians with the rigour, vigour and determination required. Instead, they have thrown up three watermelon red Ministers for the Green cult, and pump for the imposition of even harder Greens' demands. The Rightwing "sputternak tanks" have also spurned scientists who showed the ability to fight in public. Combined with their intellectual feebleness, it is understandable why the Left consider that lot not only to be clowns but also pet lambs, as quiet as Mary's baaaaaa lamb.
Dr. Spencer was one of 60 scientists who signed this petition:
Open Kyoto to DebateThe signatories is a gallaxy of distinguished scientists. What is telling is all the petitions and open letters and documents that have been raised by scientists against Greens' lies over the years have all been signed by distinguished scientists around the world. John Daly, Still Waiting for Greenhouse, compiled them on his site for all to view.
(An open letter to Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada,
from 60 Expert Scientists)
6 April 2006
Dear Prime Minister:
As accredited experts in climate and related scientific disciplines, we are writing to propose that balanced, comprehensive public-consultation sessions be held so as to examine the scientific foundation of the federal government's climate-change plans. This would be entirely consistent with your recent commitment to conduct a review of the Kyoto Protocol. Although many of us made the same suggestion to then-prime ministers Martin and Chretien, neither responded, and, to date, no formal, independent climate-science review has been conducted in Canada. Much of the billions of dollars earmarked for implementation of the protocol in Canada will be squandered without a proper assessment of recent developments in climate science.
Observational evidence does not support today's computer climate models, so there is little reason to trust model predictions of the future. Yet this is precisely what the United Nations did in creating and promoting Kyoto and still does in the alarmist forecasts on which Canada's climate policies are based. Even if the climate models were realistic, the environmental impact of Canada delaying implementation of Kyoto or other greenhouse-gas reduction schemes, pending completion of consultations, would be insignificant. Directing your government to convene balanced, open hearings as soon as possible would be a most prudent and responsible course of action.
While the confident pronouncements of scientifically unqualified environmental groups may provide for sensational headlines, they are no basis for mature policy formulation. The study of global climate change is, as you have said, an "emerging science," one that is perhaps the most complex ever tackled. It may be many years yet before we properly understand the Earth's climate system. Nevertheless, significant advances have been made since the protocol was created, many of which are taking us away from a concern about increasing greenhouse gases. If, back in the mid-1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary.
We appreciate the difficulty any government has formulating sensible science-based policy when the loudest voices always seem to be pushing in the opposite direction. However, by convening open, unbiased consultations, Canadians will be permitted to hear from experts on both sides of the debate in the climate-science community. When the public comes to understand that there is no "consensus" among climate scientists about the relative importance of the various causes of global climate change, the government will be in a far better position to develop plans that reflect reality and so benefit both the environment and the economy.
"Climate change is real" is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified. Global climate changes all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural "noise". The new Canadian government's commitment to reducing air, land and water pollution is commendable, but allocating funds to "stopping climate change" would be irrational. We need to continue intensive research into the real causes of climate change and help our most vulnerable citizens adapt to whatever nature throws at us next.
We believe the Canadian public and government decision-makers need and deserve to hear the whole story concerning this very complex issue. It was only 30 years ago that many of today's global-warming alarmists were telling us that the world was in the midst of a global-cooling catastrophe. But the science continued to evolve, and still does, even though so many choose to ignore it when it does not fit with predetermined political agendas.
We hope that you will examine our proposal carefully and we stand willing and able to furnish you with more information on this crucially important topic.
Sincerely,
* Dr. Ian D. Clark, professor, isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa
* Dr. Tad Murty, former senior research scientist, Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans, former director of Australia's National Tidal Facility and professor of earth sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide; currently adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa
* Dr. R. Timothy Patterson, professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University, Ottawa
* Dr. Fred Michel, director, Institute of Environmental Science and associate professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa
* Dr. Madhav Khandekar, former research scientist, Environment Canada. Member of editorial board of Climate Research and Natural Hazards
* Dr. Paul Copper, FRSC, professor emeritus, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ont.
* Dr. Ross McKitrick, associate professor, Dept. of Economics, University of Guelph, Ont.
* Dr. Tim Ball, former professor of climatology, University of Winnipeg; environmental consultant
* Dr. Andreas Prokoph, adjunct professor of earth sciences, University of Ottawa; consultant in statistics and geology
* Mr. David Nowell, M.Sc. (Meteorology), fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society, Canadian member and past chairman of the NATO Meteorological Group, Ottawa
* Dr. Christopher Essex, professor of applied mathematics and associate director of the Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
* Dr. Gordon E. Swaters, professor of applied mathematics, Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, and member, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Research Group, University of Alberta
* Dr. L. Graham Smith, associate professor, Dept. of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
* Dr. G. Cornelis van Kooten, professor and Canada Research Chair in environmental studies and climate change, Dept. of Economics, University of Victoria
* Dr. Petr Chylek, adjunct professor, Dept. of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax
* Dr./Cdr. M. R. Morgan, FRMS, climate consultant, former meteorology advisor to the World Meteorological Organization. Previously research scientist in climatology at University of Exeter, U.K.
* Dr. Keith D. Hage, climate consultant and professor emeritus of Meteorology, University of Alberta
* Dr. David E. Wojick, P.Eng., energy consultant, Star Tannery, Va., and Sioux Lookout, Ont.
* Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, principal consultant, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey, B.C.
* Dr. Douglas Leahey, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, Calgary
* Paavo Siitam, M.Sc., agronomist, chemist, Cobourg, Ont.
* Dr. Chris de Freitas, climate scientist, associate professor, The University of Auckland, N.Z.
* Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
* Dr. Freeman J. Dyson, emeritus professor of physics, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, N.J.
* Mr. George Taylor, Dept. of Meteorology, Oregon State University; Oregon State climatologist; past president, American Association of State Climatologists
* Dr. Ian Plimer, professor of geology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide; emeritus professor of earth sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia
* Dr. R.M. Carter, professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
* Mr. William Kininmonth, Australasian Climate Research, former Head National Climate Centre, Australian Bureau of Meteorology; former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology, Scientific and Technical Review
* Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, former director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
* Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen, geologist/paleoclimatologist, Climate Change Consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, New Zealand
* Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, professor of environmental sciences, University of Virginia
* Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, emeritus professor of paleogeophysics & geodynamics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
* Dr. Gary D. Sharp, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, Calif.
* Dr. Roy W. Spencer, principal research scientist, Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama, Huntsville
* Dr. Al Pekarek, associate professor of geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Dept., St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minn.
* Dr. Marcel Leroux, professor emeritus of climatology, University of Lyon, France; former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS
* Dr. Paul Reiter, professor, Institut Pasteur, Unit of Insects and Infectious Diseases, Paris, France. Expert reviewer, IPCC Working group II, chapter 8 (human health)
* Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, physicist and chairman, Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, Poland
* Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, reader, Dept. of Geography, University of Hull, U.K.; editor, Energy & Environment
* Dr. Hans H.J. Labohm, former advisor to the executive board, Clingendael Institute (The Netherlands Institute of International Relations) and an economist who has focused on climate change
* Dr. Lee C. Gerhard, senior scientist emeritus, University of Kansas, past director and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey
* Dr. Asmunn Moene, past head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, Norway
* Dr. August H. Auer, past professor of atmospheric science, University of Wyoming; previously chief meteorologist, Meteorological Service (MetService) of New Zealand
* Dr. Vincent Gray, expert reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of 'Climate Change 2001,' Wellington, N.Z.
* Dr. Howard Hayden, emeritus professor of physics, University of Connecticut
* Dr Benny Peiser, professor of social anthropology, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, U.K.
* Dr. Jack Barrett, chemist and spectroscopist, formerly with Imperial College London, U.K.
* Dr. William J.R. Alexander, professor emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Biosystems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Member, United Nations Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000
* Dr. S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences, University of Virginia; former director, U.S. Weather Satellite Service
* Dr. Harry N.A. Priem, emeritus professor of planetary geology and isotope geophysics, Utrecht University; former director of the Netherlands Institute for Isotope Geosciences; past president of the Royal Netherlands Geological & Mining Society
* Dr. Robert H. Essenhigh, E.G. Bailey professor of energy conversion, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
* Dr. Sallie Baliunas, astrophysicist and climate researcher, Boston, Mass.
* Douglas Hoyt, senior scientist at Raytheon (retired) and co-author of the book The Role of the Sun in Climate Change; previously with NCAR, NOAA, and the World Radiation Center, Davos, Switzerland
* Dipl.-Ing. Peter Dietze, independent energy advisor and scientific climate and carbon modeller, official IPCC reviewer, Bavaria, Germany
* Dr. Boris Winterhalter, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, Finland
* Dr. Wibjorn Karlen, emeritus professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden
* Dr. Hugh W. Ellsaesser, physicist/meteorologist, previously with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Calif.; atmospheric consultant.
* Dr. Art Robinson, founder, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, Cave Junction, Ore.
* Dr. Arthur Rorsch, emeritus professor of molecular genetics, Leiden University, The Netherlands; past board member, Netherlands organization for applied research (TNO) in environmental, food and public health
* Dr. Alister McFarquhar, Downing College, Cambridge, U.K.; international economist
* Dr. Richard S. Courtney, climate and atmospheric science consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, U.K.
That much great work has been done for over a decade is a fact that not only Australia's Left dominiated media conceals from the public, for obvious reasons. It is a fact neither the IPA nor the CIS has promoted, and run on, and certainly never approched any of the thousands of scientists who have acted in this matter. Instead, the IPA is now pretending it, this very year, is uncovering the truth - a fool's joke and it ain't April 1 anymore.
Neither have the CIS and IPA accepted scientists' offers, pro bono, to fight this grievous matter in public debate. I have been told by Liberal Party heavyweights, fed up to the gills with the Right and their "sunk tanks", they have refused all such offers. And the Right call themselves geniuses. Luckily it is not WW II and these idle ignoramuses commanders because the Wermacht would have destroyed the Allied forces.
Reader Comments
to our Newsletter